| //===- InstCombineAtomicRMW.cpp -------------------------------------------===// |
| // |
| // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. |
| // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. |
| // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception |
| // |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
| // |
| // This file implements the visit functions for atomic rmw instructions. |
| // |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
| #include "InstCombineInternal.h" |
| #include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h" |
| |
| using namespace llvm; |
| |
| namespace { |
| /// Return true if and only if the given instruction does not modify the memory |
| /// location referenced. Note that an idemptent atomicrmw may still have |
| /// ordering effects on nearby instructions, or be volatile. |
| /// TODO: Common w/ the version in AtomicExpandPass, and change the term used. |
| /// Idemptotent is confusing in this context. |
| bool isIdempotentRMW(AtomicRMWInst& RMWI) { |
| if (auto CF = dyn_cast<ConstantFP>(RMWI.getValOperand())) |
| switch(RMWI.getOperation()) { |
| case AtomicRMWInst::FAdd: // -0.0 |
| return CF->isZero() && CF->isNegative(); |
| case AtomicRMWInst::FSub: // +0.0 |
| return CF->isZero() && !CF->isNegative(); |
| default: |
| return false; |
| }; |
| |
| auto C = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(RMWI.getValOperand()); |
| if(!C) |
| return false; |
| |
| switch(RMWI.getOperation()) { |
| case AtomicRMWInst::Add: |
| case AtomicRMWInst::Sub: |
| case AtomicRMWInst::Or: |
| case AtomicRMWInst::Xor: |
| return C->isZero(); |
| case AtomicRMWInst::And: |
| return C->isMinusOne(); |
| case AtomicRMWInst::Min: |
| return C->isMaxValue(true); |
| case AtomicRMWInst::Max: |
| return C->isMinValue(true); |
| case AtomicRMWInst::UMin: |
| return C->isMaxValue(false); |
| case AtomicRMWInst::UMax: |
| return C->isMinValue(false); |
| default: |
| return false; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /// Return true if the given instruction always produces a value in memory |
| /// equivalent to its value operand. |
| bool isSaturating(AtomicRMWInst& RMWI) { |
| if (auto CF = dyn_cast<ConstantFP>(RMWI.getValOperand())) |
| switch(RMWI.getOperation()) { |
| case AtomicRMWInst::FAdd: |
| case AtomicRMWInst::FSub: |
| return CF->isNaN(); |
| default: |
| return false; |
| }; |
| |
| auto C = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(RMWI.getValOperand()); |
| if(!C) |
| return false; |
| |
| switch(RMWI.getOperation()) { |
| default: |
| return false; |
| case AtomicRMWInst::Xchg: |
| return true; |
| case AtomicRMWInst::Or: |
| return C->isAllOnesValue(); |
| case AtomicRMWInst::And: |
| return C->isZero(); |
| case AtomicRMWInst::Min: |
| return C->isMinValue(true); |
| case AtomicRMWInst::Max: |
| return C->isMaxValue(true); |
| case AtomicRMWInst::UMin: |
| return C->isMinValue(false); |
| case AtomicRMWInst::UMax: |
| return C->isMaxValue(false); |
| }; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| Instruction *InstCombiner::visitAtomicRMWInst(AtomicRMWInst &RMWI) { |
| |
| // Volatile RMWs perform a load and a store, we cannot replace this by just a |
| // load or just a store. We chose not to canonicalize out of general paranoia |
| // about user expectations around volatile. |
| if (RMWI.isVolatile()) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // Any atomicrmw op which produces a known result in memory can be |
| // replaced w/an atomicrmw xchg. |
| if (isSaturating(RMWI) && |
| RMWI.getOperation() != AtomicRMWInst::Xchg) { |
| RMWI.setOperation(AtomicRMWInst::Xchg); |
| return &RMWI; |
| } |
| |
| AtomicOrdering Ordering = RMWI.getOrdering(); |
| assert(Ordering != AtomicOrdering::NotAtomic && |
| Ordering != AtomicOrdering::Unordered && |
| "AtomicRMWs don't make sense with Unordered or NotAtomic"); |
| |
| // Any atomicrmw xchg with no uses can be converted to a atomic store if the |
| // ordering is compatible. |
| if (RMWI.getOperation() == AtomicRMWInst::Xchg && |
| RMWI.use_empty()) { |
| if (Ordering != AtomicOrdering::Release && |
| Ordering != AtomicOrdering::Monotonic) |
| return nullptr; |
| auto *SI = new StoreInst(RMWI.getValOperand(), |
| RMWI.getPointerOperand(), &RMWI); |
| SI->setAtomic(Ordering, RMWI.getSyncScopeID()); |
| SI->setAlignment(MaybeAlign(DL.getABITypeAlignment(RMWI.getType()))); |
| return eraseInstFromFunction(RMWI); |
| } |
| |
| if (!isIdempotentRMW(RMWI)) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // We chose to canonicalize all idempotent operations to an single |
| // operation code and constant. This makes it easier for the rest of the |
| // optimizer to match easily. The choices of or w/0 and fadd w/-0.0 are |
| // arbitrary. |
| if (RMWI.getType()->isIntegerTy() && |
| RMWI.getOperation() != AtomicRMWInst::Or) { |
| RMWI.setOperation(AtomicRMWInst::Or); |
| RMWI.setOperand(1, ConstantInt::get(RMWI.getType(), 0)); |
| return &RMWI; |
| } else if (RMWI.getType()->isFloatingPointTy() && |
| RMWI.getOperation() != AtomicRMWInst::FAdd) { |
| RMWI.setOperation(AtomicRMWInst::FAdd); |
| RMWI.setOperand(1, ConstantFP::getNegativeZero(RMWI.getType())); |
| return &RMWI; |
| } |
| |
| // Check if the required ordering is compatible with an atomic load. |
| if (Ordering != AtomicOrdering::Acquire && |
| Ordering != AtomicOrdering::Monotonic) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| LoadInst *Load = new LoadInst(RMWI.getType(), RMWI.getPointerOperand()); |
| Load->setAtomic(Ordering, RMWI.getSyncScopeID()); |
| Load->setAlignment(MaybeAlign(DL.getABITypeAlignment(RMWI.getType()))); |
| return Load; |
| } |