| //===- LoopLoadElimination.cpp - Loop Load Elimination Pass ---------------===// | |
| // | |
| // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. | |
| // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. | |
| // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception | |
| // | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| // | |
| // This file implement a loop-aware load elimination pass. | |
| // | |
| // It uses LoopAccessAnalysis to identify loop-carried dependences with a | |
| // distance of one between stores and loads. These form the candidates for the | |
| // transformation. The source value of each store then propagated to the user | |
| // of the corresponding load. This makes the load dead. | |
| // | |
| // The pass can also version the loop and add memchecks in order to prove that | |
| // may-aliasing stores can't change the value in memory before it's read by the | |
| // load. | |
| // | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| #include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar/LoopLoadElimination.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/APInt.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/DepthFirstIterator.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/AliasAnalysis.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/AssumptionCache.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/BlockFrequencyInfo.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/GlobalsModRef.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/LazyBlockFrequencyInfo.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/LoopAnalysisManager.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/MemorySSA.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/ProfileSummaryInfo.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpressions.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/TargetLibraryInfo.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/DataLayout.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Module.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/PassManager.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Type.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Value.h" | |
| #include "llvm/InitializePasses.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Pass.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Support/Casting.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Support/Debug.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/LoopVersioning.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/SizeOpts.h" | |
| #include <algorithm> | |
| #include <cassert> | |
| #include <forward_list> | |
| #include <set> | |
| #include <tuple> | |
| #include <utility> | |
| using namespace llvm; | |
| #define LLE_OPTION "loop-load-elim" | |
| #define DEBUG_TYPE LLE_OPTION | |
| static cl::opt<unsigned> CheckPerElim( | |
| "runtime-check-per-loop-load-elim", cl::Hidden, | |
| cl::desc("Max number of memchecks allowed per eliminated load on average"), | |
| cl::init(1)); | |
| static cl::opt<unsigned> LoadElimSCEVCheckThreshold( | |
| "loop-load-elimination-scev-check-threshold", cl::init(8), cl::Hidden, | |
| cl::desc("The maximum number of SCEV checks allowed for Loop " | |
| "Load Elimination")); | |
| STATISTIC(NumLoopLoadEliminted, "Number of loads eliminated by LLE"); | |
| namespace { | |
| /// Represent a store-to-forwarding candidate. | |
| struct StoreToLoadForwardingCandidate { | |
| LoadInst *Load; | |
| StoreInst *Store; | |
| StoreToLoadForwardingCandidate(LoadInst *Load, StoreInst *Store) | |
| : Load(Load), Store(Store) {} | |
| /// Return true if the dependence from the store to the load has a | |
| /// distance of one. E.g. A[i+1] = A[i] | |
| bool isDependenceDistanceOfOne(PredicatedScalarEvolution &PSE, | |
| Loop *L) const { | |
| Value *LoadPtr = Load->getPointerOperand(); | |
| Value *StorePtr = Store->getPointerOperand(); | |
| Type *LoadPtrType = LoadPtr->getType(); | |
| Type *LoadType = LoadPtrType->getPointerElementType(); | |
| assert(LoadPtrType->getPointerAddressSpace() == | |
| StorePtr->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace() && | |
| LoadType == StorePtr->getType()->getPointerElementType() && | |
| "Should be a known dependence"); | |
| // Currently we only support accesses with unit stride. FIXME: we should be | |
| // able to handle non unit stirde as well as long as the stride is equal to | |
| // the dependence distance. | |
| if (getPtrStride(PSE, LoadPtr, L) != 1 || | |
| getPtrStride(PSE, StorePtr, L) != 1) | |
| return false; | |
| auto &DL = Load->getParent()->getModule()->getDataLayout(); | |
| unsigned TypeByteSize = DL.getTypeAllocSize(const_cast<Type *>(LoadType)); | |
| auto *LoadPtrSCEV = cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(PSE.getSCEV(LoadPtr)); | |
| auto *StorePtrSCEV = cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(PSE.getSCEV(StorePtr)); | |
| // We don't need to check non-wrapping here because forward/backward | |
| // dependence wouldn't be valid if these weren't monotonic accesses. | |
| auto *Dist = cast<SCEVConstant>( | |
| PSE.getSE()->getMinusSCEV(StorePtrSCEV, LoadPtrSCEV)); | |
| const APInt &Val = Dist->getAPInt(); | |
| return Val == TypeByteSize; | |
| } | |
| Value *getLoadPtr() const { return Load->getPointerOperand(); } | |
| #ifndef NDEBUG | |
| friend raw_ostream &operator<<(raw_ostream &OS, | |
| const StoreToLoadForwardingCandidate &Cand) { | |
| OS << *Cand.Store << " -->\n"; | |
| OS.indent(2) << *Cand.Load << "\n"; | |
| return OS; | |
| } | |
| #endif | |
| }; | |
| } // end anonymous namespace | |
| /// Check if the store dominates all latches, so as long as there is no | |
| /// intervening store this value will be loaded in the next iteration. | |
| static bool doesStoreDominatesAllLatches(BasicBlock *StoreBlock, Loop *L, | |
| DominatorTree *DT) { | |
| SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 8> Latches; | |
| L->getLoopLatches(Latches); | |
| return llvm::all_of(Latches, [&](const BasicBlock *Latch) { | |
| return DT->dominates(StoreBlock, Latch); | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| /// Return true if the load is not executed on all paths in the loop. | |
| static bool isLoadConditional(LoadInst *Load, Loop *L) { | |
| return Load->getParent() != L->getHeader(); | |
| } | |
| namespace { | |
| /// The per-loop class that does most of the work. | |
| class LoadEliminationForLoop { | |
| public: | |
| LoadEliminationForLoop(Loop *L, LoopInfo *LI, const LoopAccessInfo &LAI, | |
| DominatorTree *DT, BlockFrequencyInfo *BFI, | |
| ProfileSummaryInfo* PSI) | |
| : L(L), LI(LI), LAI(LAI), DT(DT), BFI(BFI), PSI(PSI), PSE(LAI.getPSE()) {} | |
| /// Look through the loop-carried and loop-independent dependences in | |
| /// this loop and find store->load dependences. | |
| /// | |
| /// Note that no candidate is returned if LAA has failed to analyze the loop | |
| /// (e.g. if it's not bottom-tested, contains volatile memops, etc.) | |
| std::forward_list<StoreToLoadForwardingCandidate> | |
| findStoreToLoadDependences(const LoopAccessInfo &LAI) { | |
| std::forward_list<StoreToLoadForwardingCandidate> Candidates; | |
| const auto *Deps = LAI.getDepChecker().getDependences(); | |
| if (!Deps) | |
| return Candidates; | |
| // Find store->load dependences (consequently true dep). Both lexically | |
| // forward and backward dependences qualify. Disqualify loads that have | |
| // other unknown dependences. | |
| SmallPtrSet<Instruction *, 4> LoadsWithUnknownDepedence; | |
| for (const auto &Dep : *Deps) { | |
| Instruction *Source = Dep.getSource(LAI); | |
| Instruction *Destination = Dep.getDestination(LAI); | |
| if (Dep.Type == MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::Unknown) { | |
| if (isa<LoadInst>(Source)) | |
| LoadsWithUnknownDepedence.insert(Source); | |
| if (isa<LoadInst>(Destination)) | |
| LoadsWithUnknownDepedence.insert(Destination); | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| if (Dep.isBackward()) | |
| // Note that the designations source and destination follow the program | |
| // order, i.e. source is always first. (The direction is given by the | |
| // DepType.) | |
| std::swap(Source, Destination); | |
| else | |
| assert(Dep.isForward() && "Needs to be a forward dependence"); | |
| auto *Store = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(Source); | |
| if (!Store) | |
| continue; | |
| auto *Load = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(Destination); | |
| if (!Load) | |
| continue; | |
| // Only progagate the value if they are of the same type. | |
| if (Store->getPointerOperandType() != Load->getPointerOperandType()) | |
| continue; | |
| Candidates.emplace_front(Load, Store); | |
| } | |
| if (!LoadsWithUnknownDepedence.empty()) | |
| Candidates.remove_if([&](const StoreToLoadForwardingCandidate &C) { | |
| return LoadsWithUnknownDepedence.count(C.Load); | |
| }); | |
| return Candidates; | |
| } | |
| /// Return the index of the instruction according to program order. | |
| unsigned getInstrIndex(Instruction *Inst) { | |
| auto I = InstOrder.find(Inst); | |
| assert(I != InstOrder.end() && "No index for instruction"); | |
| return I->second; | |
| } | |
| /// If a load has multiple candidates associated (i.e. different | |
| /// stores), it means that it could be forwarding from multiple stores | |
| /// depending on control flow. Remove these candidates. | |
| /// | |
| /// Here, we rely on LAA to include the relevant loop-independent dependences. | |
| /// LAA is known to omit these in the very simple case when the read and the | |
| /// write within an alias set always takes place using the *same* pointer. | |
| /// | |
| /// However, we know that this is not the case here, i.e. we can rely on LAA | |
| /// to provide us with loop-independent dependences for the cases we're | |
| /// interested. Consider the case for example where a loop-independent | |
| /// dependece S1->S2 invalidates the forwarding S3->S2. | |
| /// | |
| /// A[i] = ... (S1) | |
| /// ... = A[i] (S2) | |
| /// A[i+1] = ... (S3) | |
| /// | |
| /// LAA will perform dependence analysis here because there are two | |
| /// *different* pointers involved in the same alias set (&A[i] and &A[i+1]). | |
| void removeDependencesFromMultipleStores( | |
| std::forward_list<StoreToLoadForwardingCandidate> &Candidates) { | |
| // If Store is nullptr it means that we have multiple stores forwarding to | |
| // this store. | |
| using LoadToSingleCandT = | |
| DenseMap<LoadInst *, const StoreToLoadForwardingCandidate *>; | |
| LoadToSingleCandT LoadToSingleCand; | |
| for (const auto &Cand : Candidates) { | |
| bool NewElt; | |
| LoadToSingleCandT::iterator Iter; | |
| std::tie(Iter, NewElt) = | |
| LoadToSingleCand.insert(std::make_pair(Cand.Load, &Cand)); | |
| if (!NewElt) { | |
| const StoreToLoadForwardingCandidate *&OtherCand = Iter->second; | |
| // Already multiple stores forward to this load. | |
| if (OtherCand == nullptr) | |
| continue; | |
| // Handle the very basic case when the two stores are in the same block | |
| // so deciding which one forwards is easy. The later one forwards as | |
| // long as they both have a dependence distance of one to the load. | |
| if (Cand.Store->getParent() == OtherCand->Store->getParent() && | |
| Cand.isDependenceDistanceOfOne(PSE, L) && | |
| OtherCand->isDependenceDistanceOfOne(PSE, L)) { | |
| // They are in the same block, the later one will forward to the load. | |
| if (getInstrIndex(OtherCand->Store) < getInstrIndex(Cand.Store)) | |
| OtherCand = &Cand; | |
| } else | |
| OtherCand = nullptr; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| Candidates.remove_if([&](const StoreToLoadForwardingCandidate &Cand) { | |
| if (LoadToSingleCand[Cand.Load] != &Cand) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG( | |
| dbgs() << "Removing from candidates: \n" | |
| << Cand | |
| << " The load may have multiple stores forwarding to " | |
| << "it\n"); | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| return false; | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| /// Given two pointers operations by their RuntimePointerChecking | |
| /// indices, return true if they require an alias check. | |
| /// | |
| /// We need a check if one is a pointer for a candidate load and the other is | |
| /// a pointer for a possibly intervening store. | |
| bool needsChecking(unsigned PtrIdx1, unsigned PtrIdx2, | |
| const SmallPtrSet<Value *, 4> &PtrsWrittenOnFwdingPath, | |
| const std::set<Value *> &CandLoadPtrs) { | |
| Value *Ptr1 = | |
| LAI.getRuntimePointerChecking()->getPointerInfo(PtrIdx1).PointerValue; | |
| Value *Ptr2 = | |
| LAI.getRuntimePointerChecking()->getPointerInfo(PtrIdx2).PointerValue; | |
| return ((PtrsWrittenOnFwdingPath.count(Ptr1) && CandLoadPtrs.count(Ptr2)) || | |
| (PtrsWrittenOnFwdingPath.count(Ptr2) && CandLoadPtrs.count(Ptr1))); | |
| } | |
| /// Return pointers that are possibly written to on the path from a | |
| /// forwarding store to a load. | |
| /// | |
| /// These pointers need to be alias-checked against the forwarding candidates. | |
| SmallPtrSet<Value *, 4> findPointersWrittenOnForwardingPath( | |
| const SmallVectorImpl<StoreToLoadForwardingCandidate> &Candidates) { | |
| // From FirstStore to LastLoad neither of the elimination candidate loads | |
| // should overlap with any of the stores. | |
| // | |
| // E.g.: | |
| // | |
| // st1 C[i] | |
| // ld1 B[i] <-------, | |
| // ld0 A[i] <----, | * LastLoad | |
| // ... | | | |
| // st2 E[i] | | | |
| // st3 B[i+1] -- | -' * FirstStore | |
| // st0 A[i+1] ---' | |
| // st4 D[i] | |
| // | |
| // st0 forwards to ld0 if the accesses in st4 and st1 don't overlap with | |
| // ld0. | |
| LoadInst *LastLoad = | |
| std::max_element(Candidates.begin(), Candidates.end(), | |
| [&](const StoreToLoadForwardingCandidate &A, | |
| const StoreToLoadForwardingCandidate &B) { | |
| return getInstrIndex(A.Load) < getInstrIndex(B.Load); | |
| }) | |
| ->Load; | |
| StoreInst *FirstStore = | |
| std::min_element(Candidates.begin(), Candidates.end(), | |
| [&](const StoreToLoadForwardingCandidate &A, | |
| const StoreToLoadForwardingCandidate &B) { | |
| return getInstrIndex(A.Store) < | |
| getInstrIndex(B.Store); | |
| }) | |
| ->Store; | |
| // We're looking for stores after the first forwarding store until the end | |
| // of the loop, then from the beginning of the loop until the last | |
| // forwarded-to load. Collect the pointer for the stores. | |
| SmallPtrSet<Value *, 4> PtrsWrittenOnFwdingPath; | |
| auto InsertStorePtr = [&](Instruction *I) { | |
| if (auto *S = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(I)) | |
| PtrsWrittenOnFwdingPath.insert(S->getPointerOperand()); | |
| }; | |
| const auto &MemInstrs = LAI.getDepChecker().getMemoryInstructions(); | |
| std::for_each(MemInstrs.begin() + getInstrIndex(FirstStore) + 1, | |
| MemInstrs.end(), InsertStorePtr); | |
| std::for_each(MemInstrs.begin(), &MemInstrs[getInstrIndex(LastLoad)], | |
| InsertStorePtr); | |
| return PtrsWrittenOnFwdingPath; | |
| } | |
| /// Determine the pointer alias checks to prove that there are no | |
| /// intervening stores. | |
| SmallVector<RuntimePointerChecking::PointerCheck, 4> collectMemchecks( | |
| const SmallVectorImpl<StoreToLoadForwardingCandidate> &Candidates) { | |
| SmallPtrSet<Value *, 4> PtrsWrittenOnFwdingPath = | |
| findPointersWrittenOnForwardingPath(Candidates); | |
| // Collect the pointers of the candidate loads. | |
| // FIXME: SmallPtrSet does not work with std::inserter. | |
| std::set<Value *> CandLoadPtrs; | |
| transform(Candidates, | |
| std::inserter(CandLoadPtrs, CandLoadPtrs.begin()), | |
| std::mem_fn(&StoreToLoadForwardingCandidate::getLoadPtr)); | |
| const auto &AllChecks = LAI.getRuntimePointerChecking()->getChecks(); | |
| SmallVector<RuntimePointerChecking::PointerCheck, 4> Checks; | |
| copy_if(AllChecks, std::back_inserter(Checks), | |
| [&](const RuntimePointerChecking::PointerCheck &Check) { | |
| for (auto PtrIdx1 : Check.first->Members) | |
| for (auto PtrIdx2 : Check.second->Members) | |
| if (needsChecking(PtrIdx1, PtrIdx2, PtrsWrittenOnFwdingPath, | |
| CandLoadPtrs)) | |
| return true; | |
| return false; | |
| }); | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\nPointer Checks (count: " << Checks.size() | |
| << "):\n"); | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(LAI.getRuntimePointerChecking()->printChecks(dbgs(), Checks)); | |
| return Checks; | |
| } | |
| /// Perform the transformation for a candidate. | |
| void | |
| propagateStoredValueToLoadUsers(const StoreToLoadForwardingCandidate &Cand, | |
| SCEVExpander &SEE) { | |
| // loop: | |
| // %x = load %gep_i | |
| // = ... %x | |
| // store %y, %gep_i_plus_1 | |
| // | |
| // => | |
| // | |
| // ph: | |
| // %x.initial = load %gep_0 | |
| // loop: | |
| // %x.storeforward = phi [%x.initial, %ph] [%y, %loop] | |
| // %x = load %gep_i <---- now dead | |
| // = ... %x.storeforward | |
| // store %y, %gep_i_plus_1 | |
| Value *Ptr = Cand.Load->getPointerOperand(); | |
| auto *PtrSCEV = cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(PSE.getSCEV(Ptr)); | |
| auto *PH = L->getLoopPreheader(); | |
| Value *InitialPtr = SEE.expandCodeFor(PtrSCEV->getStart(), Ptr->getType(), | |
| PH->getTerminator()); | |
| Value *Initial = new LoadInst( | |
| Cand.Load->getType(), InitialPtr, "load_initial", | |
| /* isVolatile */ false, MaybeAlign(Cand.Load->getAlignment()), | |
| PH->getTerminator()); | |
| PHINode *PHI = PHINode::Create(Initial->getType(), 2, "store_forwarded", | |
| &L->getHeader()->front()); | |
| PHI->addIncoming(Initial, PH); | |
| PHI->addIncoming(Cand.Store->getOperand(0), L->getLoopLatch()); | |
| Cand.Load->replaceAllUsesWith(PHI); | |
| } | |
| /// Top-level driver for each loop: find store->load forwarding | |
| /// candidates, add run-time checks and perform transformation. | |
| bool processLoop() { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\nIn \"" << L->getHeader()->getParent()->getName() | |
| << "\" checking " << *L << "\n"); | |
| // Look for store-to-load forwarding cases across the | |
| // backedge. E.g.: | |
| // | |
| // loop: | |
| // %x = load %gep_i | |
| // = ... %x | |
| // store %y, %gep_i_plus_1 | |
| // | |
| // => | |
| // | |
| // ph: | |
| // %x.initial = load %gep_0 | |
| // loop: | |
| // %x.storeforward = phi [%x.initial, %ph] [%y, %loop] | |
| // %x = load %gep_i <---- now dead | |
| // = ... %x.storeforward | |
| // store %y, %gep_i_plus_1 | |
| // First start with store->load dependences. | |
| auto StoreToLoadDependences = findStoreToLoadDependences(LAI); | |
| if (StoreToLoadDependences.empty()) | |
| return false; | |
| // Generate an index for each load and store according to the original | |
| // program order. This will be used later. | |
| InstOrder = LAI.getDepChecker().generateInstructionOrderMap(); | |
| // To keep things simple for now, remove those where the load is potentially | |
| // fed by multiple stores. | |
| removeDependencesFromMultipleStores(StoreToLoadDependences); | |
| if (StoreToLoadDependences.empty()) | |
| return false; | |
| // Filter the candidates further. | |
| SmallVector<StoreToLoadForwardingCandidate, 4> Candidates; | |
| unsigned NumForwarding = 0; | |
| for (const StoreToLoadForwardingCandidate &Cand : StoreToLoadDependences) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Candidate " << Cand); | |
| // Make sure that the stored values is available everywhere in the loop in | |
| // the next iteration. | |
| if (!doesStoreDominatesAllLatches(Cand.Store->getParent(), L, DT)) | |
| continue; | |
| // If the load is conditional we can't hoist its 0-iteration instance to | |
| // the preheader because that would make it unconditional. Thus we would | |
| // access a memory location that the original loop did not access. | |
| if (isLoadConditional(Cand.Load, L)) | |
| continue; | |
| // Check whether the SCEV difference is the same as the induction step, | |
| // thus we load the value in the next iteration. | |
| if (!Cand.isDependenceDistanceOfOne(PSE, L)) | |
| continue; | |
| ++NumForwarding; | |
| LLVM_DEBUG( | |
| dbgs() | |
| << NumForwarding | |
| << ". Valid store-to-load forwarding across the loop backedge\n"); | |
| Candidates.push_back(Cand); | |
| } | |
| if (Candidates.empty()) | |
| return false; | |
| // Check intervening may-alias stores. These need runtime checks for alias | |
| // disambiguation. | |
| SmallVector<RuntimePointerChecking::PointerCheck, 4> Checks = | |
| collectMemchecks(Candidates); | |
| // Too many checks are likely to outweigh the benefits of forwarding. | |
| if (Checks.size() > Candidates.size() * CheckPerElim) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Too many run-time checks needed.\n"); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| if (LAI.getPSE().getUnionPredicate().getComplexity() > | |
| LoadElimSCEVCheckThreshold) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Too many SCEV run-time checks needed.\n"); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| if (!Checks.empty() || !LAI.getPSE().getUnionPredicate().isAlwaysTrue()) { | |
| if (LAI.hasConvergentOp()) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Versioning is needed but not allowed with " | |
| "convergent calls\n"); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| auto *HeaderBB = L->getHeader(); | |
| auto *F = HeaderBB->getParent(); | |
| bool OptForSize = F->hasOptSize() || | |
| llvm::shouldOptimizeForSize(HeaderBB, PSI, BFI, | |
| PGSOQueryType::IRPass); | |
| if (OptForSize) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG( | |
| dbgs() << "Versioning is needed but not allowed when optimizing " | |
| "for size.\n"); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| if (!L->isLoopSimplifyForm()) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Loop is not is loop-simplify form"); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| // Point of no-return, start the transformation. First, version the loop | |
| // if necessary. | |
| LoopVersioning LV(LAI, L, LI, DT, PSE.getSE(), false); | |
| LV.setAliasChecks(std::move(Checks)); | |
| LV.setSCEVChecks(LAI.getPSE().getUnionPredicate()); | |
| LV.versionLoop(); | |
| } | |
| // Next, propagate the value stored by the store to the users of the load. | |
| // Also for the first iteration, generate the initial value of the load. | |
| SCEVExpander SEE(*PSE.getSE(), L->getHeader()->getModule()->getDataLayout(), | |
| "storeforward"); | |
| for (const auto &Cand : Candidates) | |
| propagateStoredValueToLoadUsers(Cand, SEE); | |
| NumLoopLoadEliminted += NumForwarding; | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| private: | |
| Loop *L; | |
| /// Maps the load/store instructions to their index according to | |
| /// program order. | |
| DenseMap<Instruction *, unsigned> InstOrder; | |
| // Analyses used. | |
| LoopInfo *LI; | |
| const LoopAccessInfo &LAI; | |
| DominatorTree *DT; | |
| BlockFrequencyInfo *BFI; | |
| ProfileSummaryInfo *PSI; | |
| PredicatedScalarEvolution PSE; | |
| }; | |
| } // end anonymous namespace | |
| static bool | |
| eliminateLoadsAcrossLoops(Function &F, LoopInfo &LI, DominatorTree &DT, | |
| BlockFrequencyInfo *BFI, ProfileSummaryInfo *PSI, | |
| function_ref<const LoopAccessInfo &(Loop &)> GetLAI) { | |
| // Build up a worklist of inner-loops to transform to avoid iterator | |
| // invalidation. | |
| // FIXME: This logic comes from other passes that actually change the loop | |
| // nest structure. It isn't clear this is necessary (or useful) for a pass | |
| // which merely optimizes the use of loads in a loop. | |
| SmallVector<Loop *, 8> Worklist; | |
| for (Loop *TopLevelLoop : LI) | |
| for (Loop *L : depth_first(TopLevelLoop)) | |
| // We only handle inner-most loops. | |
| if (L->empty()) | |
| Worklist.push_back(L); | |
| // Now walk the identified inner loops. | |
| bool Changed = false; | |
| for (Loop *L : Worklist) { | |
| // The actual work is performed by LoadEliminationForLoop. | |
| LoadEliminationForLoop LEL(L, &LI, GetLAI(*L), &DT, BFI, PSI); | |
| Changed |= LEL.processLoop(); | |
| } | |
| return Changed; | |
| } | |
| namespace { | |
| /// The pass. Most of the work is delegated to the per-loop | |
| /// LoadEliminationForLoop class. | |
| class LoopLoadElimination : public FunctionPass { | |
| public: | |
| static char ID; | |
| LoopLoadElimination() : FunctionPass(ID) { | |
| initializeLoopLoadEliminationPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry()); | |
| } | |
| bool runOnFunction(Function &F) override { | |
| if (skipFunction(F)) | |
| return false; | |
| auto &LI = getAnalysis<LoopInfoWrapperPass>().getLoopInfo(); | |
| auto &LAA = getAnalysis<LoopAccessLegacyAnalysis>(); | |
| auto &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree(); | |
| auto *PSI = &getAnalysis<ProfileSummaryInfoWrapperPass>().getPSI(); | |
| auto *BFI = (PSI && PSI->hasProfileSummary()) ? | |
| &getAnalysis<LazyBlockFrequencyInfoPass>().getBFI() : | |
| nullptr; | |
| // Process each loop nest in the function. | |
| return eliminateLoadsAcrossLoops( | |
| F, LI, DT, BFI, PSI, | |
| [&LAA](Loop &L) -> const LoopAccessInfo & { return LAA.getInfo(&L); }); | |
| } | |
| void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override { | |
| AU.addRequiredID(LoopSimplifyID); | |
| AU.addRequired<LoopInfoWrapperPass>(); | |
| AU.addPreserved<LoopInfoWrapperPass>(); | |
| AU.addRequired<LoopAccessLegacyAnalysis>(); | |
| AU.addRequired<ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass>(); | |
| AU.addRequired<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>(); | |
| AU.addPreserved<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>(); | |
| AU.addPreserved<GlobalsAAWrapperPass>(); | |
| AU.addRequired<ProfileSummaryInfoWrapperPass>(); | |
| LazyBlockFrequencyInfoPass::getLazyBFIAnalysisUsage(AU); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| } // end anonymous namespace | |
| char LoopLoadElimination::ID; | |
| static const char LLE_name[] = "Loop Load Elimination"; | |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(LoopLoadElimination, LLE_OPTION, LLE_name, false, false) | |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LoopInfoWrapperPass) | |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LoopAccessLegacyAnalysis) | |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(DominatorTreeWrapperPass) | |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass) | |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LoopSimplify) | |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(ProfileSummaryInfoWrapperPass) | |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LazyBlockFrequencyInfoPass) | |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_END(LoopLoadElimination, LLE_OPTION, LLE_name, false, false) | |
| FunctionPass *llvm::createLoopLoadEliminationPass() { | |
| return new LoopLoadElimination(); | |
| } | |
| PreservedAnalyses LoopLoadEliminationPass::run(Function &F, | |
| FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) { | |
| auto &SE = AM.getResult<ScalarEvolutionAnalysis>(F); | |
| auto &LI = AM.getResult<LoopAnalysis>(F); | |
| auto &TTI = AM.getResult<TargetIRAnalysis>(F); | |
| auto &DT = AM.getResult<DominatorTreeAnalysis>(F); | |
| auto &TLI = AM.getResult<TargetLibraryAnalysis>(F); | |
| auto &AA = AM.getResult<AAManager>(F); | |
| auto &AC = AM.getResult<AssumptionAnalysis>(F); | |
| auto &MAM = AM.getResult<ModuleAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy>(F).getManager(); | |
| auto *PSI = MAM.getCachedResult<ProfileSummaryAnalysis>(*F.getParent()); | |
| auto *BFI = (PSI && PSI->hasProfileSummary()) ? | |
| &AM.getResult<BlockFrequencyAnalysis>(F) : nullptr; | |
| MemorySSA *MSSA = EnableMSSALoopDependency | |
| ? &AM.getResult<MemorySSAAnalysis>(F).getMSSA() | |
| : nullptr; | |
| auto &LAM = AM.getResult<LoopAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy>(F).getManager(); | |
| bool Changed = eliminateLoadsAcrossLoops( | |
| F, LI, DT, BFI, PSI, [&](Loop &L) -> const LoopAccessInfo & { | |
| LoopStandardAnalysisResults AR = {AA, AC, DT, LI, SE, TLI, TTI, MSSA}; | |
| return LAM.getResult<LoopAccessAnalysis>(L, AR); | |
| }); | |
| if (!Changed) | |
| return PreservedAnalyses::all(); | |
| PreservedAnalyses PA; | |
| return PA; | |
| } |