third_party/llvm-7.0/llvm/tools/llvm-exegesis/lib/Uops.cpp - SwiftShader - Git at Google

 //===-- Uops.cpp ------------------------------------------------*- C++ -*-===//
 //
 //                     The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
 //
 // This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
 // License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
 //
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//

 #include "Uops.h"

 #include "Assembler.h"
 #include "BenchmarkRunner.h"
 #include "MCInstrDescView.h"
 #include "PerfHelper.h"

 // FIXME: Load constants into registers (e.g. with fld1) to not break
 // instructions like x87.

 // Ideally we would like the only limitation on executing uops to be the issue
 // ports. Maximizing port pressure increases the likelihood that the load is
 // distributed evenly across possible ports.

 // To achieve that, one approach is to generate instructions that do not have
 // data dependencies between them.
 //
 // For some instructions, this is trivial:
 //    mov rax, qword ptr [rsi]
 //    mov rax, qword ptr [rsi]
 //    mov rax, qword ptr [rsi]
 //    mov rax, qword ptr [rsi]
 // For the above snippet, haswell just renames rax four times and executes the
 // four instructions two at a time on P23 and P0126.
 //
 // For some instructions, we just need to make sure that the source is
 // different from the destination. For example, IDIV8r reads from GPR and
 // writes to AX. We just need to ensure that the Var is assigned a
 // register which is different from AX:
 //    idiv bx
 //    idiv bx
 //    idiv bx
 //    idiv bx
 // The above snippet will be able to fully saturate the ports, while the same
 // with ax would issue one uop every `latency(IDIV8r)` cycles.
 //
 // Some instructions make this harder because they both read and write from
 // the same register:
 //    inc rax
 //    inc rax
 //    inc rax
 //    inc rax
 // This has a data dependency from each instruction to the next, limit the
 // number of instructions that can be issued in parallel.
 // It turns out that this is not a big issue on recent Intel CPUs because they
 // have heuristics to balance port pressure. In the snippet above, subsequent
 // instructions will end up evenly distributed on {P0,P1,P5,P6}, but some CPUs
 // might end up executing them all on P0 (just because they can), or try
 // avoiding P5 because it's usually under high pressure from vector
 // instructions.
 // This issue is even more important for high-latency instructions because
 // they increase the idle time of the CPU, e.g. :
 //    imul rax, rbx
 //    imul rax, rbx
 //    imul rax, rbx
 //    imul rax, rbx
 //
 // To avoid that, we do the renaming statically by generating as many
 // independent exclusive assignments as possible (until all possible registers
 // are exhausted) e.g.:
 //    imul rax, rbx
 //    imul rcx, rbx
 //    imul rdx, rbx
 //    imul r8,  rbx
 //
 // Some instruction even make the above static renaming impossible because
 // they implicitly read and write from the same operand, e.g. ADC16rr reads
 // and writes from EFLAGS.
 // In that case we just use a greedy register assignment and hope for the
 // best.

 namespace exegesis {

 static bool hasUnknownOperand(const llvm::MCOperandInfo &OpInfo) {
   return OpInfo.OperandType == llvm::MCOI::OPERAND_UNKNOWN;
 }

 // FIXME: Handle memory, see PR36905.
 static bool hasMemoryOperand(const llvm::MCOperandInfo &OpInfo) {
   return OpInfo.OperandType == llvm::MCOI::OPERAND_MEMORY;
 }

 llvm::Error
 UopsBenchmarkRunner::isInfeasible(const llvm::MCInstrDesc &MCInstrDesc) const {
   if (llvm::any_of(MCInstrDesc.operands(), hasUnknownOperand))
     return llvm::make_error<BenchmarkFailure>(
         "Infeasible : has unknown operands");
   if (llvm::any_of(MCInstrDesc.operands(), hasMemoryOperand))
     return llvm::make_error<BenchmarkFailure>(
         "Infeasible : has memory operands");
   return llvm::Error::success();
 }

 // Returns whether this Variable ties Use and Def operands together.
 static bool hasTiedOperands(const Instruction &Instr, const Variable &Var) {
   bool HasUse = false;
   bool HasDef = false;
   for (const unsigned OpIndex : Var.TiedOperands) {
     const Operand &Op = Instr.Operands[OpIndex];
     if (Op.IsDef)
       HasDef = true;
     else
       HasUse = true;
   }
   return HasUse && HasDef;
 }

 static llvm::SmallVector<const Variable *, 8>
 getTiedVariables(const Instruction &Instr) {
   llvm::SmallVector<const Variable *, 8> Result;
   for (const auto &Var : Instr.Variables)
     if (hasTiedOperands(Instr, Var))
       Result.push_back(&Var);
   return Result;
 }

 static void remove(llvm::BitVector &a, const llvm::BitVector &b) {
   assert(a.size() == b.size());
   for (auto I : b.set_bits())
     a.reset(I);
 }

 UopsBenchmarkRunner::~UopsBenchmarkRunner() = default;

 llvm::Expected<SnippetPrototype>
 UopsBenchmarkRunner::generatePrototype(unsigned Opcode) const {
   const auto &InstrDesc = State.getInstrInfo().get(Opcode);
   if (auto E = isInfeasible(InstrDesc))
     return std::move(E);
   const Instruction Instr(InstrDesc, RATC);
   const AliasingConfigurations SelfAliasing(Instr, Instr);
   if (SelfAliasing.empty()) {
     return generateUnconstrainedPrototype(Instr, "instruction is parallel");
   }
   if (SelfAliasing.hasImplicitAliasing()) {
     return generateUnconstrainedPrototype(Instr, "instruction is serial");
   }
   const auto TiedVariables = getTiedVariables(Instr);
   if (!TiedVariables.empty()) {
     if (TiedVariables.size() > 1)
       return llvm::make_error<llvm::StringError>(
           "Infeasible : don't know how to handle several tied variables",
           llvm::inconvertibleErrorCode());
     const Variable *Var = TiedVariables.front();
     assert(Var);
     assert(!Var->TiedOperands.empty());
     const Operand &Op = Instr.Operands[Var->TiedOperands.front()];
     assert(Op.Tracker);
     SnippetPrototype Prototype;
     Prototype.Explanation =
         "instruction has tied variables using static renaming.";
     for (const llvm::MCPhysReg Reg : Op.Tracker->sourceBits().set_bits()) {
       Prototype.Snippet.emplace_back(Instr);
       Prototype.Snippet.back().getValueFor(*Var) =
           llvm::MCOperand::createReg(Reg);
     }
     return std::move(Prototype);
   }
   InstructionInstance II(Instr);
   // No tied variables, we pick random values for defs.
   llvm::BitVector Defs(State.getRegInfo().getNumRegs());
   for (const auto &Op : Instr.Operands) {
     if (Op.Tracker && Op.IsExplicit && Op.IsDef) {
       auto PossibleRegisters = Op.Tracker->sourceBits();
       remove(PossibleRegisters, RATC.reservedRegisters());
       assert(PossibleRegisters.any() && "No register left to choose from");
       const auto RandomReg = randomBit(PossibleRegisters);
       Defs.set(RandomReg);
       II.getValueFor(Op) = llvm::MCOperand::createReg(RandomReg);
     }
   }
   // And pick random use values that are not reserved and don't alias with defs.
   const auto DefAliases = getAliasedBits(State.getRegInfo(), Defs);
   for (const auto &Op : Instr.Operands) {
     if (Op.Tracker && Op.IsExplicit && !Op.IsDef) {
       auto PossibleRegisters = Op.Tracker->sourceBits();
       remove(PossibleRegisters, RATC.reservedRegisters());
       remove(PossibleRegisters, DefAliases);
       assert(PossibleRegisters.any() && "No register left to choose from");
       const auto RandomReg = randomBit(PossibleRegisters);
       II.getValueFor(Op) = llvm::MCOperand::createReg(RandomReg);
     }
   }
   SnippetPrototype Prototype;
   Prototype.Explanation =
       "instruction has no tied variables picking Uses different from defs";
   Prototype.Snippet.push_back(std::move(II));
   return std::move(Prototype);
 }

 std::vector<BenchmarkMeasure>
 UopsBenchmarkRunner::runMeasurements(const ExecutableFunction &Function,
                                      const unsigned NumRepetitions) const {
   const auto &SchedModel = State.getSubtargetInfo().getSchedModel();

   std::vector<BenchmarkMeasure> Result;
   for (unsigned ProcResIdx = 1;
        ProcResIdx < SchedModel.getNumProcResourceKinds(); ++ProcResIdx) {
     const char *const PfmCounters = SchedModel.getExtraProcessorInfo()
                                         .PfmCounters.IssueCounters[ProcResIdx];
     if (!PfmCounters)
       continue;
     // We sum counts when there are several counters for a single ProcRes
     // (e.g. P23 on SandyBridge).
     int64_t CounterValue = 0;
     llvm::SmallVector<llvm::StringRef, 2> CounterNames;
     llvm::StringRef(PfmCounters).split(CounterNames, ',');
     for (const auto &CounterName : CounterNames) {
       pfm::PerfEvent UopPerfEvent(CounterName);
       if (!UopPerfEvent.valid())
         llvm::report_fatal_error(
             llvm::Twine("invalid perf event ").concat(PfmCounters));
       pfm::Counter Counter(UopPerfEvent);
       Counter.start();
       Function();
       Counter.stop();
       CounterValue += Counter.read();
     }
     Result.push_back({llvm::itostr(ProcResIdx),
                       static_cast<double>(CounterValue) / NumRepetitions,
                       SchedModel.getProcResource(ProcResIdx)->Name});
   }
   return Result;
 }

 } // namespace exegesis
	//===-- Uops.cpp ------------------------------------------------- C++ --===//
	//
	// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
	//
	// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
	// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
	//
	//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//

	#include "Uops.h"

	#include "Assembler.h"
	#include "BenchmarkRunner.h"
	#include "MCInstrDescView.h"
	#include "PerfHelper.h"

	// FIXME: Load constants into registers (e.g. with fld1) to not break
	// instructions like x87.

	// Ideally we would like the only limitation on executing uops to be the issue
	// ports. Maximizing port pressure increases the likelihood that the load is
	// distributed evenly across possible ports.

	// To achieve that, one approach is to generate instructions that do not have
	// data dependencies between them.
	//
	// For some instructions, this is trivial:
	// mov rax, qword ptr [rsi]
	// mov rax, qword ptr [rsi]
	// mov rax, qword ptr [rsi]
	// mov rax, qword ptr [rsi]
	// For the above snippet, haswell just renames rax four times and executes the
	// four instructions two at a time on P23 and P0126.
	//
	// For some instructions, we just need to make sure that the source is
	// different from the destination. For example, IDIV8r reads from GPR and
	// writes to AX. We just need to ensure that the Var is assigned a
	// register which is different from AX:
	// idiv bx
	// idiv bx
	// idiv bx
	// idiv bx
	// The above snippet will be able to fully saturate the ports, while the same
	// with ax would issue one uop every `latency(IDIV8r)` cycles.
	//
	// Some instructions make this harder because they both read and write from
	// the same register:
	// inc rax
	// inc rax
	// inc rax
	// inc rax
	// This has a data dependency from each instruction to the next, limit the
	// number of instructions that can be issued in parallel.
	// It turns out that this is not a big issue on recent Intel CPUs because they
	// have heuristics to balance port pressure. In the snippet above, subsequent
	// instructions will end up evenly distributed on {P0,P1,P5,P6}, but some CPUs
	// might end up executing them all on P0 (just because they can), or try
	// avoiding P5 because it's usually under high pressure from vector
	// instructions.
	// This issue is even more important for high-latency instructions because
	// they increase the idle time of the CPU, e.g. :
	// imul rax, rbx
	// imul rax, rbx
	// imul rax, rbx
	// imul rax, rbx
	//
	// To avoid that, we do the renaming statically by generating as many
	// independent exclusive assignments as possible (until all possible registers
	// are exhausted) e.g.:
	// imul rax, rbx
	// imul rcx, rbx
	// imul rdx, rbx
	// imul r8, rbx
	//
	// Some instruction even make the above static renaming impossible because
	// they implicitly read and write from the same operand, e.g. ADC16rr reads
	// and writes from EFLAGS.
	// In that case we just use a greedy register assignment and hope for the
	// best.

	namespace exegesis {

	static bool hasUnknownOperand(const llvm::MCOperandInfo &OpInfo) {
	return OpInfo.OperandType == llvm::MCOI::OPERAND_UNKNOWN;
	}

	// FIXME: Handle memory, see PR36905.
	static bool hasMemoryOperand(const llvm::MCOperandInfo &OpInfo) {
	return OpInfo.OperandType == llvm::MCOI::OPERAND_MEMORY;
	}

	llvm::Error
	UopsBenchmarkRunner::isInfeasible(const llvm::MCInstrDesc &MCInstrDesc) const {
	if (llvm::any_of(MCInstrDesc.operands(), hasUnknownOperand))
	return llvm::make_error<BenchmarkFailure>(
	"Infeasible : has unknown operands");
	if (llvm::any_of(MCInstrDesc.operands(), hasMemoryOperand))
	return llvm::make_error<BenchmarkFailure>(
	"Infeasible : has memory operands");
	return llvm::Error::success();
	}

	// Returns whether this Variable ties Use and Def operands together.
	static bool hasTiedOperands(const Instruction &Instr, const Variable &Var) {
	bool HasUse = false;
	bool HasDef = false;
	for (const unsigned OpIndex : Var.TiedOperands) {
	const Operand &Op = Instr.Operands[OpIndex];
	if (Op.IsDef)
	HasDef = true;
	else
	HasUse = true;
	}
	return HasUse && HasDef;
	}

	static llvm::SmallVector<const Variable *, 8>
	getTiedVariables(const Instruction &Instr) {
	llvm::SmallVector<const Variable *, 8> Result;
	for (const auto &Var : Instr.Variables)
	if (hasTiedOperands(Instr, Var))
	Result.push_back(&Var);
	return Result;
	}

	static void remove(llvm::BitVector &a, const llvm::BitVector &b) {
	assert(a.size() == b.size());
	for (auto I : b.set_bits())
	a.reset(I);
	}

	UopsBenchmarkRunner::~UopsBenchmarkRunner() = default;

	llvm::Expected<SnippetPrototype>
	UopsBenchmarkRunner::generatePrototype(unsigned Opcode) const {
	const auto &InstrDesc = State.getInstrInfo().get(Opcode);
	if (auto E = isInfeasible(InstrDesc))
	return std::move(E);
	const Instruction Instr(InstrDesc, RATC);
	const AliasingConfigurations SelfAliasing(Instr, Instr);
	if (SelfAliasing.empty()) {
	return generateUnconstrainedPrototype(Instr, "instruction is parallel");
	}
	if (SelfAliasing.hasImplicitAliasing()) {
	return generateUnconstrainedPrototype(Instr, "instruction is serial");
	}
	const auto TiedVariables = getTiedVariables(Instr);
	if (!TiedVariables.empty()) {
	if (TiedVariables.size() > 1)
	return llvm::make_error<llvm::StringError>(
	"Infeasible : don't know how to handle several tied variables",
	llvm::inconvertibleErrorCode());
	const Variable *Var = TiedVariables.front();
	assert(Var);
	assert(!Var->TiedOperands.empty());
	const Operand &Op = Instr.Operands[Var->TiedOperands.front()];
	assert(Op.Tracker);
	SnippetPrototype Prototype;
	Prototype.Explanation =
	"instruction has tied variables using static renaming.";
	for (const llvm::MCPhysReg Reg : Op.Tracker->sourceBits().set_bits()) {
	Prototype.Snippet.emplace_back(Instr);
	Prototype.Snippet.back().getValueFor(*Var) =
	llvm::MCOperand::createReg(Reg);
	}
	return std::move(Prototype);
	}
	InstructionInstance II(Instr);
	// No tied variables, we pick random values for defs.
	llvm::BitVector Defs(State.getRegInfo().getNumRegs());
	for (const auto &Op : Instr.Operands) {
	if (Op.Tracker && Op.IsExplicit && Op.IsDef) {
	auto PossibleRegisters = Op.Tracker->sourceBits();
	remove(PossibleRegisters, RATC.reservedRegisters());
	assert(PossibleRegisters.any() && "No register left to choose from");
	const auto RandomReg = randomBit(PossibleRegisters);
	Defs.set(RandomReg);
	II.getValueFor(Op) = llvm::MCOperand::createReg(RandomReg);
	}
	}
	// And pick random use values that are not reserved and don't alias with defs.
	const auto DefAliases = getAliasedBits(State.getRegInfo(), Defs);
	for (const auto &Op : Instr.Operands) {
	if (Op.Tracker && Op.IsExplicit && !Op.IsDef) {
	auto PossibleRegisters = Op.Tracker->sourceBits();
	remove(PossibleRegisters, RATC.reservedRegisters());
	remove(PossibleRegisters, DefAliases);
	assert(PossibleRegisters.any() && "No register left to choose from");
	const auto RandomReg = randomBit(PossibleRegisters);
	II.getValueFor(Op) = llvm::MCOperand::createReg(RandomReg);
	}
	}
	SnippetPrototype Prototype;
	Prototype.Explanation =
	"instruction has no tied variables picking Uses different from defs";
	Prototype.Snippet.push_back(std::move(II));
	return std::move(Prototype);
	}

	std::vector<BenchmarkMeasure>
	UopsBenchmarkRunner::runMeasurements(const ExecutableFunction &Function,
	const unsigned NumRepetitions) const {
	const auto &SchedModel = State.getSubtargetInfo().getSchedModel();

	std::vector<BenchmarkMeasure> Result;
	for (unsigned ProcResIdx = 1;
	ProcResIdx < SchedModel.getNumProcResourceKinds(); ++ProcResIdx) {
	const char *const PfmCounters = SchedModel.getExtraProcessorInfo()
	.PfmCounters.IssueCounters[ProcResIdx];
	if (!PfmCounters)
	continue;
	// We sum counts when there are several counters for a single ProcRes
	// (e.g. P23 on SandyBridge).
	int64_t CounterValue = 0;
	llvm::SmallVector<llvm::StringRef, 2> CounterNames;
	llvm::StringRef(PfmCounters).split(CounterNames, ',');
	for (const auto &CounterName : CounterNames) {
	pfm::PerfEvent UopPerfEvent(CounterName);
	if (!UopPerfEvent.valid())
	llvm::report_fatal_error(
	llvm::Twine("invalid perf event ").concat(PfmCounters));
	pfm::Counter Counter(UopPerfEvent);
	Counter.start();
	Function();
	Counter.stop();
	CounterValue += Counter.read();
	}
	Result.push_back({llvm::itostr(ProcResIdx),
	static_cast<double>(CounterValue) / NumRepetitions,
	SchedModel.getProcResource(ProcResIdx)->Name});
	}
	return Result;
	}

	} // namespace exegesis