| //===- InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp --------------------------------------------===// |
| // |
| // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. |
| // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. |
| // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception |
| // |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
| // |
| // This file implements the visitAnd, visitOr, and visitXor functions. |
| // |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
| |
| #include "InstCombineInternal.h" |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/CmpInstAnalysis.h" |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.h" |
| #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h" |
| #include "llvm/IR/ConstantRange.h" |
| #include "llvm/IR/Intrinsics.h" |
| #include "llvm/IR/PatternMatch.h" |
| using namespace llvm; |
| using namespace PatternMatch; |
| |
| #define DEBUG_TYPE "instcombine" |
| |
| /// Similar to getICmpCode but for FCmpInst. This encodes a fcmp predicate into |
| /// a four bit mask. |
| static unsigned getFCmpCode(FCmpInst::Predicate CC) { |
| assert(FCmpInst::FCMP_FALSE <= CC && CC <= FCmpInst::FCMP_TRUE && |
| "Unexpected FCmp predicate!"); |
| // Take advantage of the bit pattern of FCmpInst::Predicate here. |
| // U L G E |
| static_assert(FCmpInst::FCMP_FALSE == 0, ""); // 0 0 0 0 |
| static_assert(FCmpInst::FCMP_OEQ == 1, ""); // 0 0 0 1 |
| static_assert(FCmpInst::FCMP_OGT == 2, ""); // 0 0 1 0 |
| static_assert(FCmpInst::FCMP_OGE == 3, ""); // 0 0 1 1 |
| static_assert(FCmpInst::FCMP_OLT == 4, ""); // 0 1 0 0 |
| static_assert(FCmpInst::FCMP_OLE == 5, ""); // 0 1 0 1 |
| static_assert(FCmpInst::FCMP_ONE == 6, ""); // 0 1 1 0 |
| static_assert(FCmpInst::FCMP_ORD == 7, ""); // 0 1 1 1 |
| static_assert(FCmpInst::FCMP_UNO == 8, ""); // 1 0 0 0 |
| static_assert(FCmpInst::FCMP_UEQ == 9, ""); // 1 0 0 1 |
| static_assert(FCmpInst::FCMP_UGT == 10, ""); // 1 0 1 0 |
| static_assert(FCmpInst::FCMP_UGE == 11, ""); // 1 0 1 1 |
| static_assert(FCmpInst::FCMP_ULT == 12, ""); // 1 1 0 0 |
| static_assert(FCmpInst::FCMP_ULE == 13, ""); // 1 1 0 1 |
| static_assert(FCmpInst::FCMP_UNE == 14, ""); // 1 1 1 0 |
| static_assert(FCmpInst::FCMP_TRUE == 15, ""); // 1 1 1 1 |
| return CC; |
| } |
| |
| /// This is the complement of getICmpCode, which turns an opcode and two |
| /// operands into either a constant true or false, or a brand new ICmp |
| /// instruction. The sign is passed in to determine which kind of predicate to |
| /// use in the new icmp instruction. |
| static Value *getNewICmpValue(unsigned Code, bool Sign, Value *LHS, Value *RHS, |
| InstCombiner::BuilderTy &Builder) { |
| ICmpInst::Predicate NewPred; |
| if (Constant *TorF = getPredForICmpCode(Code, Sign, LHS->getType(), NewPred)) |
| return TorF; |
| return Builder.CreateICmp(NewPred, LHS, RHS); |
| } |
| |
| /// This is the complement of getFCmpCode, which turns an opcode and two |
| /// operands into either a FCmp instruction, or a true/false constant. |
| static Value *getFCmpValue(unsigned Code, Value *LHS, Value *RHS, |
| InstCombiner::BuilderTy &Builder) { |
| const auto Pred = static_cast<FCmpInst::Predicate>(Code); |
| assert(FCmpInst::FCMP_FALSE <= Pred && Pred <= FCmpInst::FCMP_TRUE && |
| "Unexpected FCmp predicate!"); |
| if (Pred == FCmpInst::FCMP_FALSE) |
| return ConstantInt::get(CmpInst::makeCmpResultType(LHS->getType()), 0); |
| if (Pred == FCmpInst::FCMP_TRUE) |
| return ConstantInt::get(CmpInst::makeCmpResultType(LHS->getType()), 1); |
| return Builder.CreateFCmp(Pred, LHS, RHS); |
| } |
| |
| /// Transform BITWISE_OP(BSWAP(A),BSWAP(B)) or |
| /// BITWISE_OP(BSWAP(A), Constant) to BSWAP(BITWISE_OP(A, B)) |
| /// \param I Binary operator to transform. |
| /// \return Pointer to node that must replace the original binary operator, or |
| /// null pointer if no transformation was made. |
| static Value *SimplifyBSwap(BinaryOperator &I, |
| InstCombiner::BuilderTy &Builder) { |
| assert(I.isBitwiseLogicOp() && "Unexpected opcode for bswap simplifying"); |
| |
| Value *OldLHS = I.getOperand(0); |
| Value *OldRHS = I.getOperand(1); |
| |
| Value *NewLHS; |
| if (!match(OldLHS, m_BSwap(m_Value(NewLHS)))) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| Value *NewRHS; |
| const APInt *C; |
| |
| if (match(OldRHS, m_BSwap(m_Value(NewRHS)))) { |
| // OP( BSWAP(x), BSWAP(y) ) -> BSWAP( OP(x, y) ) |
| if (!OldLHS->hasOneUse() && !OldRHS->hasOneUse()) |
| return nullptr; |
| // NewRHS initialized by the matcher. |
| } else if (match(OldRHS, m_APInt(C))) { |
| // OP( BSWAP(x), CONSTANT ) -> BSWAP( OP(x, BSWAP(CONSTANT) ) ) |
| if (!OldLHS->hasOneUse()) |
| return nullptr; |
| NewRHS = ConstantInt::get(I.getType(), C->byteSwap()); |
| } else |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| Value *BinOp = Builder.CreateBinOp(I.getOpcode(), NewLHS, NewRHS); |
| Function *F = Intrinsic::getDeclaration(I.getModule(), Intrinsic::bswap, |
| I.getType()); |
| return Builder.CreateCall(F, BinOp); |
| } |
| |
| /// This handles expressions of the form ((val OP C1) & C2). Where |
| /// the Op parameter is 'OP', OpRHS is 'C1', and AndRHS is 'C2'. |
| Instruction *InstCombiner::OptAndOp(BinaryOperator *Op, |
| ConstantInt *OpRHS, |
| ConstantInt *AndRHS, |
| BinaryOperator &TheAnd) { |
| Value *X = Op->getOperand(0); |
| |
| switch (Op->getOpcode()) { |
| default: break; |
| case Instruction::Add: |
| if (Op->hasOneUse()) { |
| // Adding a one to a single bit bit-field should be turned into an XOR |
| // of the bit. First thing to check is to see if this AND is with a |
| // single bit constant. |
| const APInt &AndRHSV = AndRHS->getValue(); |
| |
| // If there is only one bit set. |
| if (AndRHSV.isPowerOf2()) { |
| // Ok, at this point, we know that we are masking the result of the |
| // ADD down to exactly one bit. If the constant we are adding has |
| // no bits set below this bit, then we can eliminate the ADD. |
| const APInt& AddRHS = OpRHS->getValue(); |
| |
| // Check to see if any bits below the one bit set in AndRHSV are set. |
| if ((AddRHS & (AndRHSV - 1)).isNullValue()) { |
| // If not, the only thing that can effect the output of the AND is |
| // the bit specified by AndRHSV. If that bit is set, the effect of |
| // the XOR is to toggle the bit. If it is clear, then the ADD has |
| // no effect. |
| if ((AddRHS & AndRHSV).isNullValue()) { // Bit is not set, noop |
| TheAnd.setOperand(0, X); |
| return &TheAnd; |
| } else { |
| // Pull the XOR out of the AND. |
| Value *NewAnd = Builder.CreateAnd(X, AndRHS); |
| NewAnd->takeName(Op); |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateXor(NewAnd, AndRHS); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| break; |
| } |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| /// Emit a computation of: (V >= Lo && V < Hi) if Inside is true, otherwise |
| /// (V < Lo || V >= Hi). This method expects that Lo < Hi. IsSigned indicates |
| /// whether to treat V, Lo, and Hi as signed or not. |
| Value *InstCombiner::insertRangeTest(Value *V, const APInt &Lo, const APInt &Hi, |
| bool isSigned, bool Inside) { |
| assert((isSigned ? Lo.slt(Hi) : Lo.ult(Hi)) && |
| "Lo is not < Hi in range emission code!"); |
| |
| Type *Ty = V->getType(); |
| |
| // V >= Min && V < Hi --> V < Hi |
| // V < Min || V >= Hi --> V >= Hi |
| ICmpInst::Predicate Pred = Inside ? ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT : ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE; |
| if (isSigned ? Lo.isMinSignedValue() : Lo.isMinValue()) { |
| Pred = isSigned ? ICmpInst::getSignedPredicate(Pred) : Pred; |
| return Builder.CreateICmp(Pred, V, ConstantInt::get(Ty, Hi)); |
| } |
| |
| // V >= Lo && V < Hi --> V - Lo u< Hi - Lo |
| // V < Lo || V >= Hi --> V - Lo u>= Hi - Lo |
| Value *VMinusLo = |
| Builder.CreateSub(V, ConstantInt::get(Ty, Lo), V->getName() + ".off"); |
| Constant *HiMinusLo = ConstantInt::get(Ty, Hi - Lo); |
| return Builder.CreateICmp(Pred, VMinusLo, HiMinusLo); |
| } |
| |
| /// Classify (icmp eq (A & B), C) and (icmp ne (A & B), C) as matching patterns |
| /// that can be simplified. |
| /// One of A and B is considered the mask. The other is the value. This is |
| /// described as the "AMask" or "BMask" part of the enum. If the enum contains |
| /// only "Mask", then both A and B can be considered masks. If A is the mask, |
| /// then it was proven that (A & C) == C. This is trivial if C == A or C == 0. |
| /// If both A and C are constants, this proof is also easy. |
| /// For the following explanations, we assume that A is the mask. |
| /// |
| /// "AllOnes" declares that the comparison is true only if (A & B) == A or all |
| /// bits of A are set in B. |
| /// Example: (icmp eq (A & 3), 3) -> AMask_AllOnes |
| /// |
| /// "AllZeros" declares that the comparison is true only if (A & B) == 0 or all |
| /// bits of A are cleared in B. |
| /// Example: (icmp eq (A & 3), 0) -> Mask_AllZeroes |
| /// |
| /// "Mixed" declares that (A & B) == C and C might or might not contain any |
| /// number of one bits and zero bits. |
| /// Example: (icmp eq (A & 3), 1) -> AMask_Mixed |
| /// |
| /// "Not" means that in above descriptions "==" should be replaced by "!=". |
| /// Example: (icmp ne (A & 3), 3) -> AMask_NotAllOnes |
| /// |
| /// If the mask A contains a single bit, then the following is equivalent: |
| /// (icmp eq (A & B), A) equals (icmp ne (A & B), 0) |
| /// (icmp ne (A & B), A) equals (icmp eq (A & B), 0) |
| enum MaskedICmpType { |
| AMask_AllOnes = 1, |
| AMask_NotAllOnes = 2, |
| BMask_AllOnes = 4, |
| BMask_NotAllOnes = 8, |
| Mask_AllZeros = 16, |
| Mask_NotAllZeros = 32, |
| AMask_Mixed = 64, |
| AMask_NotMixed = 128, |
| BMask_Mixed = 256, |
| BMask_NotMixed = 512 |
| }; |
| |
| /// Return the set of patterns (from MaskedICmpType) that (icmp SCC (A & B), C) |
| /// satisfies. |
| static unsigned getMaskedICmpType(Value *A, Value *B, Value *C, |
| ICmpInst::Predicate Pred) { |
| ConstantInt *ACst = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(A); |
| ConstantInt *BCst = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(B); |
| ConstantInt *CCst = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(C); |
| bool IsEq = (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ); |
| bool IsAPow2 = (ACst && !ACst->isZero() && ACst->getValue().isPowerOf2()); |
| bool IsBPow2 = (BCst && !BCst->isZero() && BCst->getValue().isPowerOf2()); |
| unsigned MaskVal = 0; |
| if (CCst && CCst->isZero()) { |
| // if C is zero, then both A and B qualify as mask |
| MaskVal |= (IsEq ? (Mask_AllZeros | AMask_Mixed | BMask_Mixed) |
| : (Mask_NotAllZeros | AMask_NotMixed | BMask_NotMixed)); |
| if (IsAPow2) |
| MaskVal |= (IsEq ? (AMask_NotAllOnes | AMask_NotMixed) |
| : (AMask_AllOnes | AMask_Mixed)); |
| if (IsBPow2) |
| MaskVal |= (IsEq ? (BMask_NotAllOnes | BMask_NotMixed) |
| : (BMask_AllOnes | BMask_Mixed)); |
| return MaskVal; |
| } |
| |
| if (A == C) { |
| MaskVal |= (IsEq ? (AMask_AllOnes | AMask_Mixed) |
| : (AMask_NotAllOnes | AMask_NotMixed)); |
| if (IsAPow2) |
| MaskVal |= (IsEq ? (Mask_NotAllZeros | AMask_NotMixed) |
| : (Mask_AllZeros | AMask_Mixed)); |
| } else if (ACst && CCst && ConstantExpr::getAnd(ACst, CCst) == CCst) { |
| MaskVal |= (IsEq ? AMask_Mixed : AMask_NotMixed); |
| } |
| |
| if (B == C) { |
| MaskVal |= (IsEq ? (BMask_AllOnes | BMask_Mixed) |
| : (BMask_NotAllOnes | BMask_NotMixed)); |
| if (IsBPow2) |
| MaskVal |= (IsEq ? (Mask_NotAllZeros | BMask_NotMixed) |
| : (Mask_AllZeros | BMask_Mixed)); |
| } else if (BCst && CCst && ConstantExpr::getAnd(BCst, CCst) == CCst) { |
| MaskVal |= (IsEq ? BMask_Mixed : BMask_NotMixed); |
| } |
| |
| return MaskVal; |
| } |
| |
| /// Convert an analysis of a masked ICmp into its equivalent if all boolean |
| /// operations had the opposite sense. Since each "NotXXX" flag (recording !=) |
| /// is adjacent to the corresponding normal flag (recording ==), this just |
| /// involves swapping those bits over. |
| static unsigned conjugateICmpMask(unsigned Mask) { |
| unsigned NewMask; |
| NewMask = (Mask & (AMask_AllOnes | BMask_AllOnes | Mask_AllZeros | |
| AMask_Mixed | BMask_Mixed)) |
| << 1; |
| |
| NewMask |= (Mask & (AMask_NotAllOnes | BMask_NotAllOnes | Mask_NotAllZeros | |
| AMask_NotMixed | BMask_NotMixed)) |
| >> 1; |
| |
| return NewMask; |
| } |
| |
| // Adapts the external decomposeBitTestICmp for local use. |
| static bool decomposeBitTestICmp(Value *LHS, Value *RHS, CmpInst::Predicate &Pred, |
| Value *&X, Value *&Y, Value *&Z) { |
| APInt Mask; |
| if (!llvm::decomposeBitTestICmp(LHS, RHS, Pred, X, Mask)) |
| return false; |
| |
| Y = ConstantInt::get(X->getType(), Mask); |
| Z = ConstantInt::get(X->getType(), 0); |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| /// Handle (icmp(A & B) ==/!= C) &/| (icmp(A & D) ==/!= E). |
| /// Return the pattern classes (from MaskedICmpType) for the left hand side and |
| /// the right hand side as a pair. |
| /// LHS and RHS are the left hand side and the right hand side ICmps and PredL |
| /// and PredR are their predicates, respectively. |
| static |
| Optional<std::pair<unsigned, unsigned>> |
| getMaskedTypeForICmpPair(Value *&A, Value *&B, Value *&C, |
| Value *&D, Value *&E, ICmpInst *LHS, |
| ICmpInst *RHS, |
| ICmpInst::Predicate &PredL, |
| ICmpInst::Predicate &PredR) { |
| // vectors are not (yet?) supported. Don't support pointers either. |
| if (!LHS->getOperand(0)->getType()->isIntegerTy() || |
| !RHS->getOperand(0)->getType()->isIntegerTy()) |
| return None; |
| |
| // Here comes the tricky part: |
| // LHS might be of the form L11 & L12 == X, X == L21 & L22, |
| // and L11 & L12 == L21 & L22. The same goes for RHS. |
| // Now we must find those components L** and R**, that are equal, so |
| // that we can extract the parameters A, B, C, D, and E for the canonical |
| // above. |
| Value *L1 = LHS->getOperand(0); |
| Value *L2 = LHS->getOperand(1); |
| Value *L11, *L12, *L21, *L22; |
| // Check whether the icmp can be decomposed into a bit test. |
| if (decomposeBitTestICmp(L1, L2, PredL, L11, L12, L2)) { |
| L21 = L22 = L1 = nullptr; |
| } else { |
| // Look for ANDs in the LHS icmp. |
| if (!match(L1, m_And(m_Value(L11), m_Value(L12)))) { |
| // Any icmp can be viewed as being trivially masked; if it allows us to |
| // remove one, it's worth it. |
| L11 = L1; |
| L12 = Constant::getAllOnesValue(L1->getType()); |
| } |
| |
| if (!match(L2, m_And(m_Value(L21), m_Value(L22)))) { |
| L21 = L2; |
| L22 = Constant::getAllOnesValue(L2->getType()); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // Bail if LHS was a icmp that can't be decomposed into an equality. |
| if (!ICmpInst::isEquality(PredL)) |
| return None; |
| |
| Value *R1 = RHS->getOperand(0); |
| Value *R2 = RHS->getOperand(1); |
| Value *R11, *R12; |
| bool Ok = false; |
| if (decomposeBitTestICmp(R1, R2, PredR, R11, R12, R2)) { |
| if (R11 == L11 || R11 == L12 || R11 == L21 || R11 == L22) { |
| A = R11; |
| D = R12; |
| } else if (R12 == L11 || R12 == L12 || R12 == L21 || R12 == L22) { |
| A = R12; |
| D = R11; |
| } else { |
| return None; |
| } |
| E = R2; |
| R1 = nullptr; |
| Ok = true; |
| } else { |
| if (!match(R1, m_And(m_Value(R11), m_Value(R12)))) { |
| // As before, model no mask as a trivial mask if it'll let us do an |
| // optimization. |
| R11 = R1; |
| R12 = Constant::getAllOnesValue(R1->getType()); |
| } |
| |
| if (R11 == L11 || R11 == L12 || R11 == L21 || R11 == L22) { |
| A = R11; |
| D = R12; |
| E = R2; |
| Ok = true; |
| } else if (R12 == L11 || R12 == L12 || R12 == L21 || R12 == L22) { |
| A = R12; |
| D = R11; |
| E = R2; |
| Ok = true; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // Bail if RHS was a icmp that can't be decomposed into an equality. |
| if (!ICmpInst::isEquality(PredR)) |
| return None; |
| |
| // Look for ANDs on the right side of the RHS icmp. |
| if (!Ok) { |
| if (!match(R2, m_And(m_Value(R11), m_Value(R12)))) { |
| R11 = R2; |
| R12 = Constant::getAllOnesValue(R2->getType()); |
| } |
| |
| if (R11 == L11 || R11 == L12 || R11 == L21 || R11 == L22) { |
| A = R11; |
| D = R12; |
| E = R1; |
| Ok = true; |
| } else if (R12 == L11 || R12 == L12 || R12 == L21 || R12 == L22) { |
| A = R12; |
| D = R11; |
| E = R1; |
| Ok = true; |
| } else { |
| return None; |
| } |
| } |
| if (!Ok) |
| return None; |
| |
| if (L11 == A) { |
| B = L12; |
| C = L2; |
| } else if (L12 == A) { |
| B = L11; |
| C = L2; |
| } else if (L21 == A) { |
| B = L22; |
| C = L1; |
| } else if (L22 == A) { |
| B = L21; |
| C = L1; |
| } |
| |
| unsigned LeftType = getMaskedICmpType(A, B, C, PredL); |
| unsigned RightType = getMaskedICmpType(A, D, E, PredR); |
| return Optional<std::pair<unsigned, unsigned>>(std::make_pair(LeftType, RightType)); |
| } |
| |
| /// Try to fold (icmp(A & B) ==/!= C) &/| (icmp(A & D) ==/!= E) into a single |
| /// (icmp(A & X) ==/!= Y), where the left-hand side is of type Mask_NotAllZeros |
| /// and the right hand side is of type BMask_Mixed. For example, |
| /// (icmp (A & 12) != 0) & (icmp (A & 15) == 8) -> (icmp (A & 15) == 8). |
| static Value * foldLogOpOfMaskedICmps_NotAllZeros_BMask_Mixed( |
| ICmpInst *LHS, ICmpInst *RHS, bool IsAnd, |
| Value *A, Value *B, Value *C, Value *D, Value *E, |
| ICmpInst::Predicate PredL, ICmpInst::Predicate PredR, |
| llvm::InstCombiner::BuilderTy &Builder) { |
| // We are given the canonical form: |
| // (icmp ne (A & B), 0) & (icmp eq (A & D), E). |
| // where D & E == E. |
| // |
| // If IsAnd is false, we get it in negated form: |
| // (icmp eq (A & B), 0) | (icmp ne (A & D), E) -> |
| // !((icmp ne (A & B), 0) & (icmp eq (A & D), E)). |
| // |
| // We currently handle the case of B, C, D, E are constant. |
| // |
| ConstantInt *BCst = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(B); |
| if (!BCst) |
| return nullptr; |
| ConstantInt *CCst = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(C); |
| if (!CCst) |
| return nullptr; |
| ConstantInt *DCst = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(D); |
| if (!DCst) |
| return nullptr; |
| ConstantInt *ECst = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(E); |
| if (!ECst) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| ICmpInst::Predicate NewCC = IsAnd ? ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ : ICmpInst::ICMP_NE; |
| |
| // Update E to the canonical form when D is a power of two and RHS is |
| // canonicalized as, |
| // (icmp ne (A & D), 0) -> (icmp eq (A & D), D) or |
| // (icmp ne (A & D), D) -> (icmp eq (A & D), 0). |
| if (PredR != NewCC) |
| ECst = cast<ConstantInt>(ConstantExpr::getXor(DCst, ECst)); |
| |
| // If B or D is zero, skip because if LHS or RHS can be trivially folded by |
| // other folding rules and this pattern won't apply any more. |
| if (BCst->getValue() == 0 || DCst->getValue() == 0) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // If B and D don't intersect, ie. (B & D) == 0, no folding because we can't |
| // deduce anything from it. |
| // For example, |
| // (icmp ne (A & 12), 0) & (icmp eq (A & 3), 1) -> no folding. |
| if ((BCst->getValue() & DCst->getValue()) == 0) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // If the following two conditions are met: |
| // |
| // 1. mask B covers only a single bit that's not covered by mask D, that is, |
| // (B & (B ^ D)) is a power of 2 (in other words, B minus the intersection of |
| // B and D has only one bit set) and, |
| // |
| // 2. RHS (and E) indicates that the rest of B's bits are zero (in other |
| // words, the intersection of B and D is zero), that is, ((B & D) & E) == 0 |
| // |
| // then that single bit in B must be one and thus the whole expression can be |
| // folded to |
| // (A & (B | D)) == (B & (B ^ D)) | E. |
| // |
| // For example, |
| // (icmp ne (A & 12), 0) & (icmp eq (A & 7), 1) -> (icmp eq (A & 15), 9) |
| // (icmp ne (A & 15), 0) & (icmp eq (A & 7), 0) -> (icmp eq (A & 15), 8) |
| if ((((BCst->getValue() & DCst->getValue()) & ECst->getValue()) == 0) && |
| (BCst->getValue() & (BCst->getValue() ^ DCst->getValue())).isPowerOf2()) { |
| APInt BorD = BCst->getValue() | DCst->getValue(); |
| APInt BandBxorDorE = (BCst->getValue() & (BCst->getValue() ^ DCst->getValue())) | |
| ECst->getValue(); |
| Value *NewMask = ConstantInt::get(BCst->getType(), BorD); |
| Value *NewMaskedValue = ConstantInt::get(BCst->getType(), BandBxorDorE); |
| Value *NewAnd = Builder.CreateAnd(A, NewMask); |
| return Builder.CreateICmp(NewCC, NewAnd, NewMaskedValue); |
| } |
| |
| auto IsSubSetOrEqual = [](ConstantInt *C1, ConstantInt *C2) { |
| return (C1->getValue() & C2->getValue()) == C1->getValue(); |
| }; |
| auto IsSuperSetOrEqual = [](ConstantInt *C1, ConstantInt *C2) { |
| return (C1->getValue() & C2->getValue()) == C2->getValue(); |
| }; |
| |
| // In the following, we consider only the cases where B is a superset of D, B |
| // is a subset of D, or B == D because otherwise there's at least one bit |
| // covered by B but not D, in which case we can't deduce much from it, so |
| // no folding (aside from the single must-be-one bit case right above.) |
| // For example, |
| // (icmp ne (A & 14), 0) & (icmp eq (A & 3), 1) -> no folding. |
| if (!IsSubSetOrEqual(BCst, DCst) && !IsSuperSetOrEqual(BCst, DCst)) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // At this point, either B is a superset of D, B is a subset of D or B == D. |
| |
| // If E is zero, if B is a subset of (or equal to) D, LHS and RHS contradict |
| // and the whole expression becomes false (or true if negated), otherwise, no |
| // folding. |
| // For example, |
| // (icmp ne (A & 3), 0) & (icmp eq (A & 7), 0) -> false. |
| // (icmp ne (A & 15), 0) & (icmp eq (A & 3), 0) -> no folding. |
| if (ECst->isZero()) { |
| if (IsSubSetOrEqual(BCst, DCst)) |
| return ConstantInt::get(LHS->getType(), !IsAnd); |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| // At this point, B, D, E aren't zero and (B & D) == B, (B & D) == D or B == |
| // D. If B is a superset of (or equal to) D, since E is not zero, LHS is |
| // subsumed by RHS (RHS implies LHS.) So the whole expression becomes |
| // RHS. For example, |
| // (icmp ne (A & 255), 0) & (icmp eq (A & 15), 8) -> (icmp eq (A & 15), 8). |
| // (icmp ne (A & 15), 0) & (icmp eq (A & 15), 8) -> (icmp eq (A & 15), 8). |
| if (IsSuperSetOrEqual(BCst, DCst)) |
| return RHS; |
| // Otherwise, B is a subset of D. If B and E have a common bit set, |
| // ie. (B & E) != 0, then LHS is subsumed by RHS. For example. |
| // (icmp ne (A & 12), 0) & (icmp eq (A & 15), 8) -> (icmp eq (A & 15), 8). |
| assert(IsSubSetOrEqual(BCst, DCst) && "Precondition due to above code"); |
| if ((BCst->getValue() & ECst->getValue()) != 0) |
| return RHS; |
| // Otherwise, LHS and RHS contradict and the whole expression becomes false |
| // (or true if negated.) For example, |
| // (icmp ne (A & 7), 0) & (icmp eq (A & 15), 8) -> false. |
| // (icmp ne (A & 6), 0) & (icmp eq (A & 15), 8) -> false. |
| return ConstantInt::get(LHS->getType(), !IsAnd); |
| } |
| |
| /// Try to fold (icmp(A & B) ==/!= 0) &/| (icmp(A & D) ==/!= E) into a single |
| /// (icmp(A & X) ==/!= Y), where the left-hand side and the right hand side |
| /// aren't of the common mask pattern type. |
| static Value *foldLogOpOfMaskedICmpsAsymmetric( |
| ICmpInst *LHS, ICmpInst *RHS, bool IsAnd, |
| Value *A, Value *B, Value *C, Value *D, Value *E, |
| ICmpInst::Predicate PredL, ICmpInst::Predicate PredR, |
| unsigned LHSMask, unsigned RHSMask, |
| llvm::InstCombiner::BuilderTy &Builder) { |
| assert(ICmpInst::isEquality(PredL) && ICmpInst::isEquality(PredR) && |
| "Expected equality predicates for masked type of icmps."); |
| // Handle Mask_NotAllZeros-BMask_Mixed cases. |
| // (icmp ne/eq (A & B), C) &/| (icmp eq/ne (A & D), E), or |
| // (icmp eq/ne (A & B), C) &/| (icmp ne/eq (A & D), E) |
| // which gets swapped to |
| // (icmp ne/eq (A & D), E) &/| (icmp eq/ne (A & B), C). |
| if (!IsAnd) { |
| LHSMask = conjugateICmpMask(LHSMask); |
| RHSMask = conjugateICmpMask(RHSMask); |
| } |
| if ((LHSMask & Mask_NotAllZeros) && (RHSMask & BMask_Mixed)) { |
| if (Value *V = foldLogOpOfMaskedICmps_NotAllZeros_BMask_Mixed( |
| LHS, RHS, IsAnd, A, B, C, D, E, |
| PredL, PredR, Builder)) { |
| return V; |
| } |
| } else if ((LHSMask & BMask_Mixed) && (RHSMask & Mask_NotAllZeros)) { |
| if (Value *V = foldLogOpOfMaskedICmps_NotAllZeros_BMask_Mixed( |
| RHS, LHS, IsAnd, A, D, E, B, C, |
| PredR, PredL, Builder)) { |
| return V; |
| } |
| } |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| /// Try to fold (icmp(A & B) ==/!= C) &/| (icmp(A & D) ==/!= E) |
| /// into a single (icmp(A & X) ==/!= Y). |
| static Value *foldLogOpOfMaskedICmps(ICmpInst *LHS, ICmpInst *RHS, bool IsAnd, |
| llvm::InstCombiner::BuilderTy &Builder) { |
| Value *A = nullptr, *B = nullptr, *C = nullptr, *D = nullptr, *E = nullptr; |
| ICmpInst::Predicate PredL = LHS->getPredicate(), PredR = RHS->getPredicate(); |
| Optional<std::pair<unsigned, unsigned>> MaskPair = |
| getMaskedTypeForICmpPair(A, B, C, D, E, LHS, RHS, PredL, PredR); |
| if (!MaskPair) |
| return nullptr; |
| assert(ICmpInst::isEquality(PredL) && ICmpInst::isEquality(PredR) && |
| "Expected equality predicates for masked type of icmps."); |
| unsigned LHSMask = MaskPair->first; |
| unsigned RHSMask = MaskPair->second; |
| unsigned Mask = LHSMask & RHSMask; |
| if (Mask == 0) { |
| // Even if the two sides don't share a common pattern, check if folding can |
| // still happen. |
| if (Value *V = foldLogOpOfMaskedICmpsAsymmetric( |
| LHS, RHS, IsAnd, A, B, C, D, E, PredL, PredR, LHSMask, RHSMask, |
| Builder)) |
| return V; |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| // In full generality: |
| // (icmp (A & B) Op C) | (icmp (A & D) Op E) |
| // == ![ (icmp (A & B) !Op C) & (icmp (A & D) !Op E) ] |
| // |
| // If the latter can be converted into (icmp (A & X) Op Y) then the former is |
| // equivalent to (icmp (A & X) !Op Y). |
| // |
| // Therefore, we can pretend for the rest of this function that we're dealing |
| // with the conjunction, provided we flip the sense of any comparisons (both |
| // input and output). |
| |
| // In most cases we're going to produce an EQ for the "&&" case. |
| ICmpInst::Predicate NewCC = IsAnd ? ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ : ICmpInst::ICMP_NE; |
| if (!IsAnd) { |
| // Convert the masking analysis into its equivalent with negated |
| // comparisons. |
| Mask = conjugateICmpMask(Mask); |
| } |
| |
| if (Mask & Mask_AllZeros) { |
| // (icmp eq (A & B), 0) & (icmp eq (A & D), 0) |
| // -> (icmp eq (A & (B|D)), 0) |
| Value *NewOr = Builder.CreateOr(B, D); |
| Value *NewAnd = Builder.CreateAnd(A, NewOr); |
| // We can't use C as zero because we might actually handle |
| // (icmp ne (A & B), B) & (icmp ne (A & D), D) |
| // with B and D, having a single bit set. |
| Value *Zero = Constant::getNullValue(A->getType()); |
| return Builder.CreateICmp(NewCC, NewAnd, Zero); |
| } |
| if (Mask & BMask_AllOnes) { |
| // (icmp eq (A & B), B) & (icmp eq (A & D), D) |
| // -> (icmp eq (A & (B|D)), (B|D)) |
| Value *NewOr = Builder.CreateOr(B, D); |
| Value *NewAnd = Builder.CreateAnd(A, NewOr); |
| return Builder.CreateICmp(NewCC, NewAnd, NewOr); |
| } |
| if (Mask & AMask_AllOnes) { |
| // (icmp eq (A & B), A) & (icmp eq (A & D), A) |
| // -> (icmp eq (A & (B&D)), A) |
| Value *NewAnd1 = Builder.CreateAnd(B, D); |
| Value *NewAnd2 = Builder.CreateAnd(A, NewAnd1); |
| return Builder.CreateICmp(NewCC, NewAnd2, A); |
| } |
| |
| // Remaining cases assume at least that B and D are constant, and depend on |
| // their actual values. This isn't strictly necessary, just a "handle the |
| // easy cases for now" decision. |
| ConstantInt *BCst = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(B); |
| if (!BCst) |
| return nullptr; |
| ConstantInt *DCst = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(D); |
| if (!DCst) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| if (Mask & (Mask_NotAllZeros | BMask_NotAllOnes)) { |
| // (icmp ne (A & B), 0) & (icmp ne (A & D), 0) and |
| // (icmp ne (A & B), B) & (icmp ne (A & D), D) |
| // -> (icmp ne (A & B), 0) or (icmp ne (A & D), 0) |
| // Only valid if one of the masks is a superset of the other (check "B&D" is |
| // the same as either B or D). |
| APInt NewMask = BCst->getValue() & DCst->getValue(); |
| |
| if (NewMask == BCst->getValue()) |
| return LHS; |
| else if (NewMask == DCst->getValue()) |
| return RHS; |
| } |
| |
| if (Mask & AMask_NotAllOnes) { |
| // (icmp ne (A & B), B) & (icmp ne (A & D), D) |
| // -> (icmp ne (A & B), A) or (icmp ne (A & D), A) |
| // Only valid if one of the masks is a superset of the other (check "B|D" is |
| // the same as either B or D). |
| APInt NewMask = BCst->getValue() | DCst->getValue(); |
| |
| if (NewMask == BCst->getValue()) |
| return LHS; |
| else if (NewMask == DCst->getValue()) |
| return RHS; |
| } |
| |
| if (Mask & BMask_Mixed) { |
| // (icmp eq (A & B), C) & (icmp eq (A & D), E) |
| // We already know that B & C == C && D & E == E. |
| // If we can prove that (B & D) & (C ^ E) == 0, that is, the bits of |
| // C and E, which are shared by both the mask B and the mask D, don't |
| // contradict, then we can transform to |
| // -> (icmp eq (A & (B|D)), (C|E)) |
| // Currently, we only handle the case of B, C, D, and E being constant. |
| // We can't simply use C and E because we might actually handle |
| // (icmp ne (A & B), B) & (icmp eq (A & D), D) |
| // with B and D, having a single bit set. |
| ConstantInt *CCst = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(C); |
| if (!CCst) |
| return nullptr; |
| ConstantInt *ECst = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(E); |
| if (!ECst) |
| return nullptr; |
| if (PredL != NewCC) |
| CCst = cast<ConstantInt>(ConstantExpr::getXor(BCst, CCst)); |
| if (PredR != NewCC) |
| ECst = cast<ConstantInt>(ConstantExpr::getXor(DCst, ECst)); |
| |
| // If there is a conflict, we should actually return a false for the |
| // whole construct. |
| if (((BCst->getValue() & DCst->getValue()) & |
| (CCst->getValue() ^ ECst->getValue())).getBoolValue()) |
| return ConstantInt::get(LHS->getType(), !IsAnd); |
| |
| Value *NewOr1 = Builder.CreateOr(B, D); |
| Value *NewOr2 = ConstantExpr::getOr(CCst, ECst); |
| Value *NewAnd = Builder.CreateAnd(A, NewOr1); |
| return Builder.CreateICmp(NewCC, NewAnd, NewOr2); |
| } |
| |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| /// Try to fold a signed range checked with lower bound 0 to an unsigned icmp. |
| /// Example: (icmp sge x, 0) & (icmp slt x, n) --> icmp ult x, n |
| /// If \p Inverted is true then the check is for the inverted range, e.g. |
| /// (icmp slt x, 0) | (icmp sgt x, n) --> icmp ugt x, n |
| Value *InstCombiner::simplifyRangeCheck(ICmpInst *Cmp0, ICmpInst *Cmp1, |
| bool Inverted) { |
| // Check the lower range comparison, e.g. x >= 0 |
| // InstCombine already ensured that if there is a constant it's on the RHS. |
| ConstantInt *RangeStart = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Cmp0->getOperand(1)); |
| if (!RangeStart) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| ICmpInst::Predicate Pred0 = (Inverted ? Cmp0->getInversePredicate() : |
| Cmp0->getPredicate()); |
| |
| // Accept x > -1 or x >= 0 (after potentially inverting the predicate). |
| if (!((Pred0 == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT && RangeStart->isMinusOne()) || |
| (Pred0 == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE && RangeStart->isZero()))) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| ICmpInst::Predicate Pred1 = (Inverted ? Cmp1->getInversePredicate() : |
| Cmp1->getPredicate()); |
| |
| Value *Input = Cmp0->getOperand(0); |
| Value *RangeEnd; |
| if (Cmp1->getOperand(0) == Input) { |
| // For the upper range compare we have: icmp x, n |
| RangeEnd = Cmp1->getOperand(1); |
| } else if (Cmp1->getOperand(1) == Input) { |
| // For the upper range compare we have: icmp n, x |
| RangeEnd = Cmp1->getOperand(0); |
| Pred1 = ICmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Pred1); |
| } else { |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| // Check the upper range comparison, e.g. x < n |
| ICmpInst::Predicate NewPred; |
| switch (Pred1) { |
| case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT: NewPred = ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT; break; |
| case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE: NewPred = ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE; break; |
| default: return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| // This simplification is only valid if the upper range is not negative. |
| KnownBits Known = computeKnownBits(RangeEnd, /*Depth=*/0, Cmp1); |
| if (!Known.isNonNegative()) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| if (Inverted) |
| NewPred = ICmpInst::getInversePredicate(NewPred); |
| |
| return Builder.CreateICmp(NewPred, Input, RangeEnd); |
| } |
| |
| static Value * |
| foldAndOrOfEqualityCmpsWithConstants(ICmpInst *LHS, ICmpInst *RHS, |
| bool JoinedByAnd, |
| InstCombiner::BuilderTy &Builder) { |
| Value *X = LHS->getOperand(0); |
| if (X != RHS->getOperand(0)) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| const APInt *C1, *C2; |
| if (!match(LHS->getOperand(1), m_APInt(C1)) || |
| !match(RHS->getOperand(1), m_APInt(C2))) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // We only handle (X != C1 && X != C2) and (X == C1 || X == C2). |
| ICmpInst::Predicate Pred = LHS->getPredicate(); |
| if (Pred != RHS->getPredicate()) |
| return nullptr; |
| if (JoinedByAnd && Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_NE) |
| return nullptr; |
| if (!JoinedByAnd && Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // The larger unsigned constant goes on the right. |
| if (C1->ugt(*C2)) |
| std::swap(C1, C2); |
| |
| APInt Xor = *C1 ^ *C2; |
| if (Xor.isPowerOf2()) { |
| // If LHSC and RHSC differ by only one bit, then set that bit in X and |
| // compare against the larger constant: |
| // (X == C1 || X == C2) --> (X | (C1 ^ C2)) == C2 |
| // (X != C1 && X != C2) --> (X | (C1 ^ C2)) != C2 |
| // We choose an 'or' with a Pow2 constant rather than the inverse mask with |
| // 'and' because that may lead to smaller codegen from a smaller constant. |
| Value *Or = Builder.CreateOr(X, ConstantInt::get(X->getType(), Xor)); |
| return Builder.CreateICmp(Pred, Or, ConstantInt::get(X->getType(), *C2)); |
| } |
| |
| // Special case: get the ordering right when the values wrap around zero. |
| // Ie, we assumed the constants were unsigned when swapping earlier. |
| if (C1->isNullValue() && C2->isAllOnesValue()) |
| std::swap(C1, C2); |
| |
| if (*C1 == *C2 - 1) { |
| // (X == 13 || X == 14) --> X - 13 <=u 1 |
| // (X != 13 && X != 14) --> X - 13 >u 1 |
| // An 'add' is the canonical IR form, so favor that over a 'sub'. |
| Value *Add = Builder.CreateAdd(X, ConstantInt::get(X->getType(), -(*C1))); |
| auto NewPred = JoinedByAnd ? ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT : ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE; |
| return Builder.CreateICmp(NewPred, Add, ConstantInt::get(X->getType(), 1)); |
| } |
| |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| // Fold (iszero(A & K1) | iszero(A & K2)) -> (A & (K1 | K2)) != (K1 | K2) |
| // Fold (!iszero(A & K1) & !iszero(A & K2)) -> (A & (K1 | K2)) == (K1 | K2) |
| Value *InstCombiner::foldAndOrOfICmpsOfAndWithPow2(ICmpInst *LHS, ICmpInst *RHS, |
| bool JoinedByAnd, |
| Instruction &CxtI) { |
| ICmpInst::Predicate Pred = LHS->getPredicate(); |
| if (Pred != RHS->getPredicate()) |
| return nullptr; |
| if (JoinedByAnd && Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_NE) |
| return nullptr; |
| if (!JoinedByAnd && Pred != ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // TODO support vector splats |
| ConstantInt *LHSC = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(LHS->getOperand(1)); |
| ConstantInt *RHSC = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(RHS->getOperand(1)); |
| if (!LHSC || !RHSC || !LHSC->isZero() || !RHSC->isZero()) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| Value *A, *B, *C, *D; |
| if (match(LHS->getOperand(0), m_And(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) && |
| match(RHS->getOperand(0), m_And(m_Value(C), m_Value(D)))) { |
| if (A == D || B == D) |
| std::swap(C, D); |
| if (B == C) |
| std::swap(A, B); |
| |
| if (A == C && |
| isKnownToBeAPowerOfTwo(B, false, 0, &CxtI) && |
| isKnownToBeAPowerOfTwo(D, false, 0, &CxtI)) { |
| Value *Mask = Builder.CreateOr(B, D); |
| Value *Masked = Builder.CreateAnd(A, Mask); |
| auto NewPred = JoinedByAnd ? ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ : ICmpInst::ICMP_NE; |
| return Builder.CreateICmp(NewPred, Masked, Mask); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| /// General pattern: |
| /// X & Y |
| /// |
| /// Where Y is checking that all the high bits (covered by a mask 4294967168) |
| /// are uniform, i.e. %arg & 4294967168 can be either 4294967168 or 0 |
| /// Pattern can be one of: |
| /// %t = add i32 %arg, 128 |
| /// %r = icmp ult i32 %t, 256 |
| /// Or |
| /// %t0 = shl i32 %arg, 24 |
| /// %t1 = ashr i32 %t0, 24 |
| /// %r = icmp eq i32 %t1, %arg |
| /// Or |
| /// %t0 = trunc i32 %arg to i8 |
| /// %t1 = sext i8 %t0 to i32 |
| /// %r = icmp eq i32 %t1, %arg |
| /// This pattern is a signed truncation check. |
| /// |
| /// And X is checking that some bit in that same mask is zero. |
| /// I.e. can be one of: |
| /// %r = icmp sgt i32 %arg, -1 |
| /// Or |
| /// %t = and i32 %arg, 2147483648 |
| /// %r = icmp eq i32 %t, 0 |
| /// |
| /// Since we are checking that all the bits in that mask are the same, |
| /// and a particular bit is zero, what we are really checking is that all the |
| /// masked bits are zero. |
| /// So this should be transformed to: |
| /// %r = icmp ult i32 %arg, 128 |
| static Value *foldSignedTruncationCheck(ICmpInst *ICmp0, ICmpInst *ICmp1, |
| Instruction &CxtI, |
| InstCombiner::BuilderTy &Builder) { |
| assert(CxtI.getOpcode() == Instruction::And); |
| |
| // Match icmp ult (add %arg, C01), C1 (C1 == C01 << 1; powers of two) |
| auto tryToMatchSignedTruncationCheck = [](ICmpInst *ICmp, Value *&X, |
| APInt &SignBitMask) -> bool { |
| CmpInst::Predicate Pred; |
| const APInt *I01, *I1; // powers of two; I1 == I01 << 1 |
| if (!(match(ICmp, |
| m_ICmp(Pred, m_Add(m_Value(X), m_Power2(I01)), m_Power2(I1))) && |
| Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT && I1->ugt(*I01) && I01->shl(1) == *I1)) |
| return false; |
| // Which bit is the new sign bit as per the 'signed truncation' pattern? |
| SignBitMask = *I01; |
| return true; |
| }; |
| |
| // One icmp needs to be 'signed truncation check'. |
| // We need to match this first, else we will mismatch commutative cases. |
| Value *X1; |
| APInt HighestBit; |
| ICmpInst *OtherICmp; |
| if (tryToMatchSignedTruncationCheck(ICmp1, X1, HighestBit)) |
| OtherICmp = ICmp0; |
| else if (tryToMatchSignedTruncationCheck(ICmp0, X1, HighestBit)) |
| OtherICmp = ICmp1; |
| else |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| assert(HighestBit.isPowerOf2() && "expected to be power of two (non-zero)"); |
| |
| // Try to match/decompose into: icmp eq (X & Mask), 0 |
| auto tryToDecompose = [](ICmpInst *ICmp, Value *&X, |
| APInt &UnsetBitsMask) -> bool { |
| CmpInst::Predicate Pred = ICmp->getPredicate(); |
| // Can it be decomposed into icmp eq (X & Mask), 0 ? |
| if (llvm::decomposeBitTestICmp(ICmp->getOperand(0), ICmp->getOperand(1), |
| Pred, X, UnsetBitsMask, |
| /*LookThroughTrunc=*/false) && |
| Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ) |
| return true; |
| // Is it icmp eq (X & Mask), 0 already? |
| const APInt *Mask; |
| if (match(ICmp, m_ICmp(Pred, m_And(m_Value(X), m_APInt(Mask)), m_Zero())) && |
| Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ) { |
| UnsetBitsMask = *Mask; |
| return true; |
| } |
| return false; |
| }; |
| |
| // And the other icmp needs to be decomposable into a bit test. |
| Value *X0; |
| APInt UnsetBitsMask; |
| if (!tryToDecompose(OtherICmp, X0, UnsetBitsMask)) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| assert(!UnsetBitsMask.isNullValue() && "empty mask makes no sense."); |
| |
| // Are they working on the same value? |
| Value *X; |
| if (X1 == X0) { |
| // Ok as is. |
| X = X1; |
| } else if (match(X0, m_Trunc(m_Specific(X1)))) { |
| UnsetBitsMask = UnsetBitsMask.zext(X1->getType()->getScalarSizeInBits()); |
| X = X1; |
| } else |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // So which bits should be uniform as per the 'signed truncation check'? |
| // (all the bits starting with (i.e. including) HighestBit) |
| APInt SignBitsMask = ~(HighestBit - 1U); |
| |
| // UnsetBitsMask must have some common bits with SignBitsMask, |
| if (!UnsetBitsMask.intersects(SignBitsMask)) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // Does UnsetBitsMask contain any bits outside of SignBitsMask? |
| if (!UnsetBitsMask.isSubsetOf(SignBitsMask)) { |
| APInt OtherHighestBit = (~UnsetBitsMask) + 1U; |
| if (!OtherHighestBit.isPowerOf2()) |
| return nullptr; |
| HighestBit = APIntOps::umin(HighestBit, OtherHighestBit); |
| } |
| // Else, if it does not, then all is ok as-is. |
| |
| // %r = icmp ult %X, SignBit |
| return Builder.CreateICmpULT(X, ConstantInt::get(X->getType(), HighestBit), |
| CxtI.getName() + ".simplified"); |
| } |
| |
| /// Reduce a pair of compares that check if a value has exactly 1 bit set. |
| static Value *foldIsPowerOf2(ICmpInst *Cmp0, ICmpInst *Cmp1, bool JoinedByAnd, |
| InstCombiner::BuilderTy &Builder) { |
| // Handle 'and' / 'or' commutation: make the equality check the first operand. |
| if (JoinedByAnd && Cmp1->getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE) |
| std::swap(Cmp0, Cmp1); |
| else if (!JoinedByAnd && Cmp1->getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ) |
| std::swap(Cmp0, Cmp1); |
| |
| // (X != 0) && (ctpop(X) u< 2) --> ctpop(X) == 1 |
| CmpInst::Predicate Pred0, Pred1; |
| Value *X; |
| if (JoinedByAnd && match(Cmp0, m_ICmp(Pred0, m_Value(X), m_ZeroInt())) && |
| match(Cmp1, m_ICmp(Pred1, m_Intrinsic<Intrinsic::ctpop>(m_Specific(X)), |
| m_SpecificInt(2))) && |
| Pred0 == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE && Pred1 == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT) { |
| Value *CtPop = Cmp1->getOperand(0); |
| return Builder.CreateICmpEQ(CtPop, ConstantInt::get(CtPop->getType(), 1)); |
| } |
| // (X == 0) || (ctpop(X) u> 1) --> ctpop(X) != 1 |
| if (!JoinedByAnd && match(Cmp0, m_ICmp(Pred0, m_Value(X), m_ZeroInt())) && |
| match(Cmp1, m_ICmp(Pred1, m_Intrinsic<Intrinsic::ctpop>(m_Specific(X)), |
| m_SpecificInt(1))) && |
| Pred0 == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ && Pred1 == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT) { |
| Value *CtPop = Cmp1->getOperand(0); |
| return Builder.CreateICmpNE(CtPop, ConstantInt::get(CtPop->getType(), 1)); |
| } |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| /// Commuted variants are assumed to be handled by calling this function again |
| /// with the parameters swapped. |
| static Value *foldUnsignedUnderflowCheck(ICmpInst *ZeroICmp, |
| ICmpInst *UnsignedICmp, bool IsAnd, |
| const SimplifyQuery &Q, |
| InstCombiner::BuilderTy &Builder) { |
| Value *ZeroCmpOp; |
| ICmpInst::Predicate EqPred; |
| if (!match(ZeroICmp, m_ICmp(EqPred, m_Value(ZeroCmpOp), m_Zero())) || |
| !ICmpInst::isEquality(EqPred)) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| auto IsKnownNonZero = [&](Value *V) { |
| return isKnownNonZero(V, Q.DL, /*Depth=*/0, Q.AC, Q.CxtI, Q.DT); |
| }; |
| |
| ICmpInst::Predicate UnsignedPred; |
| |
| Value *A, *B; |
| if (match(UnsignedICmp, |
| m_c_ICmp(UnsignedPred, m_Specific(ZeroCmpOp), m_Value(A))) && |
| match(ZeroCmpOp, m_c_Add(m_Specific(A), m_Value(B))) && |
| (ZeroICmp->hasOneUse() || UnsignedICmp->hasOneUse())) { |
| if (UnsignedICmp->getOperand(0) != ZeroCmpOp) |
| UnsignedPred = ICmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(UnsignedPred); |
| |
| auto GetKnownNonZeroAndOther = [&](Value *&NonZero, Value *&Other) { |
| if (!IsKnownNonZero(NonZero)) |
| std::swap(NonZero, Other); |
| return IsKnownNonZero(NonZero); |
| }; |
| |
| // Given ZeroCmpOp = (A + B) |
| // ZeroCmpOp <= A && ZeroCmpOp != 0 --> (0-B) < A |
| // ZeroCmpOp > A || ZeroCmpOp == 0 --> (0-B) >= A |
| // |
| // ZeroCmpOp < A && ZeroCmpOp != 0 --> (0-X) < Y iff |
| // ZeroCmpOp >= A || ZeroCmpOp == 0 --> (0-X) >= Y iff |
| // with X being the value (A/B) that is known to be non-zero, |
| // and Y being remaining value. |
| if (UnsignedPred == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE && EqPred == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE && |
| IsAnd) |
| return Builder.CreateICmpULT(Builder.CreateNeg(B), A); |
| if (UnsignedPred == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT && EqPred == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE && |
| IsAnd && GetKnownNonZeroAndOther(B, A)) |
| return Builder.CreateICmpULT(Builder.CreateNeg(B), A); |
| if (UnsignedPred == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT && EqPred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ && |
| !IsAnd) |
| return Builder.CreateICmpUGE(Builder.CreateNeg(B), A); |
| if (UnsignedPred == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE && EqPred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ && |
| !IsAnd && GetKnownNonZeroAndOther(B, A)) |
| return Builder.CreateICmpUGE(Builder.CreateNeg(B), A); |
| } |
| |
| Value *Base, *Offset; |
| if (!match(ZeroCmpOp, m_Sub(m_Value(Base), m_Value(Offset)))) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| if (!match(UnsignedICmp, |
| m_c_ICmp(UnsignedPred, m_Specific(Base), m_Specific(Offset))) || |
| !ICmpInst::isUnsigned(UnsignedPred)) |
| return nullptr; |
| if (UnsignedICmp->getOperand(0) != Base) |
| UnsignedPred = ICmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(UnsignedPred); |
| |
| // Base >=/> Offset && (Base - Offset) != 0 <--> Base > Offset |
| // (no overflow and not null) |
| if ((UnsignedPred == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE || |
| UnsignedPred == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT) && |
| EqPred == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE && IsAnd) |
| return Builder.CreateICmpUGT(Base, Offset); |
| |
| // Base <=/< Offset || (Base - Offset) == 0 <--> Base <= Offset |
| // (overflow or null) |
| if ((UnsignedPred == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE || |
| UnsignedPred == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT) && |
| EqPred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ && !IsAnd) |
| return Builder.CreateICmpULE(Base, Offset); |
| |
| // Base <= Offset && (Base - Offset) != 0 --> Base < Offset |
| if (UnsignedPred == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE && EqPred == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE && |
| IsAnd) |
| return Builder.CreateICmpULT(Base, Offset); |
| |
| // Base > Offset || (Base - Offset) == 0 --> Base >= Offset |
| if (UnsignedPred == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT && EqPred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ && |
| !IsAnd) |
| return Builder.CreateICmpUGE(Base, Offset); |
| |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| /// Fold (icmp)&(icmp) if possible. |
| Value *InstCombiner::foldAndOfICmps(ICmpInst *LHS, ICmpInst *RHS, |
| Instruction &CxtI) { |
| const SimplifyQuery Q = SQ.getWithInstruction(&CxtI); |
| |
| // Fold (!iszero(A & K1) & !iszero(A & K2)) -> (A & (K1 | K2)) == (K1 | K2) |
| // if K1 and K2 are a one-bit mask. |
| if (Value *V = foldAndOrOfICmpsOfAndWithPow2(LHS, RHS, true, CxtI)) |
| return V; |
| |
| ICmpInst::Predicate PredL = LHS->getPredicate(), PredR = RHS->getPredicate(); |
| |
| // (icmp1 A, B) & (icmp2 A, B) --> (icmp3 A, B) |
| if (predicatesFoldable(PredL, PredR)) { |
| if (LHS->getOperand(0) == RHS->getOperand(1) && |
| LHS->getOperand(1) == RHS->getOperand(0)) |
| LHS->swapOperands(); |
| if (LHS->getOperand(0) == RHS->getOperand(0) && |
| LHS->getOperand(1) == RHS->getOperand(1)) { |
| Value *Op0 = LHS->getOperand(0), *Op1 = LHS->getOperand(1); |
| unsigned Code = getICmpCode(LHS) & getICmpCode(RHS); |
| bool IsSigned = LHS->isSigned() || RHS->isSigned(); |
| return getNewICmpValue(Code, IsSigned, Op0, Op1, Builder); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // handle (roughly): (icmp eq (A & B), C) & (icmp eq (A & D), E) |
| if (Value *V = foldLogOpOfMaskedICmps(LHS, RHS, true, Builder)) |
| return V; |
| |
| // E.g. (icmp sge x, 0) & (icmp slt x, n) --> icmp ult x, n |
| if (Value *V = simplifyRangeCheck(LHS, RHS, /*Inverted=*/false)) |
| return V; |
| |
| // E.g. (icmp slt x, n) & (icmp sge x, 0) --> icmp ult x, n |
| if (Value *V = simplifyRangeCheck(RHS, LHS, /*Inverted=*/false)) |
| return V; |
| |
| if (Value *V = foldAndOrOfEqualityCmpsWithConstants(LHS, RHS, true, Builder)) |
| return V; |
| |
| if (Value *V = foldSignedTruncationCheck(LHS, RHS, CxtI, Builder)) |
| return V; |
| |
| if (Value *V = foldIsPowerOf2(LHS, RHS, true /* JoinedByAnd */, Builder)) |
| return V; |
| |
| if (Value *X = |
| foldUnsignedUnderflowCheck(LHS, RHS, /*IsAnd=*/true, Q, Builder)) |
| return X; |
| if (Value *X = |
| foldUnsignedUnderflowCheck(RHS, LHS, /*IsAnd=*/true, Q, Builder)) |
| return X; |
| |
| // This only handles icmp of constants: (icmp1 A, C1) & (icmp2 B, C2). |
| Value *LHS0 = LHS->getOperand(0), *RHS0 = RHS->getOperand(0); |
| ConstantInt *LHSC = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(LHS->getOperand(1)); |
| ConstantInt *RHSC = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(RHS->getOperand(1)); |
| if (!LHSC || !RHSC) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| if (LHSC == RHSC && PredL == PredR) { |
| // (icmp ult A, C) & (icmp ult B, C) --> (icmp ult (A|B), C) |
| // where C is a power of 2 or |
| // (icmp eq A, 0) & (icmp eq B, 0) --> (icmp eq (A|B), 0) |
| if ((PredL == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT && LHSC->getValue().isPowerOf2()) || |
| (PredL == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ && LHSC->isZero())) { |
| Value *NewOr = Builder.CreateOr(LHS0, RHS0); |
| return Builder.CreateICmp(PredL, NewOr, LHSC); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // (trunc x) == C1 & (and x, CA) == C2 -> (and x, CA|CMAX) == C1|C2 |
| // where CMAX is the all ones value for the truncated type, |
| // iff the lower bits of C2 and CA are zero. |
| if (PredL == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ && PredL == PredR && LHS->hasOneUse() && |
| RHS->hasOneUse()) { |
| Value *V; |
| ConstantInt *AndC, *SmallC = nullptr, *BigC = nullptr; |
| |
| // (trunc x) == C1 & (and x, CA) == C2 |
| // (and x, CA) == C2 & (trunc x) == C1 |
| if (match(RHS0, m_Trunc(m_Value(V))) && |
| match(LHS0, m_And(m_Specific(V), m_ConstantInt(AndC)))) { |
| SmallC = RHSC; |
| BigC = LHSC; |
| } else if (match(LHS0, m_Trunc(m_Value(V))) && |
| match(RHS0, m_And(m_Specific(V), m_ConstantInt(AndC)))) { |
| SmallC = LHSC; |
| BigC = RHSC; |
| } |
| |
| if (SmallC && BigC) { |
| unsigned BigBitSize = BigC->getType()->getBitWidth(); |
| unsigned SmallBitSize = SmallC->getType()->getBitWidth(); |
| |
| // Check that the low bits are zero. |
| APInt Low = APInt::getLowBitsSet(BigBitSize, SmallBitSize); |
| if ((Low & AndC->getValue()).isNullValue() && |
| (Low & BigC->getValue()).isNullValue()) { |
| Value *NewAnd = Builder.CreateAnd(V, Low | AndC->getValue()); |
| APInt N = SmallC->getValue().zext(BigBitSize) | BigC->getValue(); |
| Value *NewVal = ConstantInt::get(AndC->getType()->getContext(), N); |
| return Builder.CreateICmp(PredL, NewAnd, NewVal); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // From here on, we only handle: |
| // (icmp1 A, C1) & (icmp2 A, C2) --> something simpler. |
| if (LHS0 != RHS0) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // ICMP_[US][GL]E X, C is folded to ICMP_[US][GL]T elsewhere. |
| if (PredL == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE || PredL == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE || |
| PredR == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE || PredR == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE || |
| PredL == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE || PredL == ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE || |
| PredR == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE || PredR == ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // We can't fold (ugt x, C) & (sgt x, C2). |
| if (!predicatesFoldable(PredL, PredR)) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // Ensure that the larger constant is on the RHS. |
| bool ShouldSwap; |
| if (CmpInst::isSigned(PredL) || |
| (ICmpInst::isEquality(PredL) && CmpInst::isSigned(PredR))) |
| ShouldSwap = LHSC->getValue().sgt(RHSC->getValue()); |
| else |
| ShouldSwap = LHSC->getValue().ugt(RHSC->getValue()); |
| |
| if (ShouldSwap) { |
| std::swap(LHS, RHS); |
| std::swap(LHSC, RHSC); |
| std::swap(PredL, PredR); |
| } |
| |
| // At this point, we know we have two icmp instructions |
| // comparing a value against two constants and and'ing the result |
| // together. Because of the above check, we know that we only have |
| // icmp eq, icmp ne, icmp [su]lt, and icmp [SU]gt here. We also know |
| // (from the icmp folding check above), that the two constants |
| // are not equal and that the larger constant is on the RHS |
| assert(LHSC != RHSC && "Compares not folded above?"); |
| |
| switch (PredL) { |
| default: |
| llvm_unreachable("Unknown integer condition code!"); |
| case ICmpInst::ICMP_NE: |
| switch (PredR) { |
| default: |
| llvm_unreachable("Unknown integer condition code!"); |
| case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT: |
| // (X != 13 & X u< 14) -> X < 13 |
| if (LHSC->getValue() == (RHSC->getValue() - 1)) |
| return Builder.CreateICmpULT(LHS0, LHSC); |
| if (LHSC->isZero()) // (X != 0 & X u< C) -> X-1 u< C-1 |
| return insertRangeTest(LHS0, LHSC->getValue() + 1, RHSC->getValue(), |
| false, true); |
| break; // (X != 13 & X u< 15) -> no change |
| case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT: |
| // (X != 13 & X s< 14) -> X < 13 |
| if (LHSC->getValue() == (RHSC->getValue() - 1)) |
| return Builder.CreateICmpSLT(LHS0, LHSC); |
| // (X != INT_MIN & X s< C) -> X-(INT_MIN+1) u< (C-(INT_MIN+1)) |
| if (LHSC->isMinValue(true)) |
| return insertRangeTest(LHS0, LHSC->getValue() + 1, RHSC->getValue(), |
| true, true); |
| break; // (X != 13 & X s< 15) -> no change |
| case ICmpInst::ICMP_NE: |
| // Potential folds for this case should already be handled. |
| break; |
| } |
| break; |
| case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT: |
| switch (PredR) { |
| default: |
| llvm_unreachable("Unknown integer condition code!"); |
| case ICmpInst::ICMP_NE: |
| // (X u> 13 & X != 14) -> X u> 14 |
| if (RHSC->getValue() == (LHSC->getValue() + 1)) |
| return Builder.CreateICmp(PredL, LHS0, RHSC); |
| // X u> C & X != UINT_MAX -> (X-(C+1)) u< UINT_MAX-(C+1) |
| if (RHSC->isMaxValue(false)) |
| return insertRangeTest(LHS0, LHSC->getValue() + 1, RHSC->getValue(), |
| false, true); |
| break; // (X u> 13 & X != 15) -> no change |
| case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT: // (X u> 13 & X u< 15) -> (X-14) u< 1 |
| return insertRangeTest(LHS0, LHSC->getValue() + 1, RHSC->getValue(), |
| false, true); |
| } |
| break; |
| case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT: |
| switch (PredR) { |
| default: |
| llvm_unreachable("Unknown integer condition code!"); |
| case ICmpInst::ICMP_NE: |
| // (X s> 13 & X != 14) -> X s> 14 |
| if (RHSC->getValue() == (LHSC->getValue() + 1)) |
| return Builder.CreateICmp(PredL, LHS0, RHSC); |
| // X s> C & X != INT_MAX -> (X-(C+1)) u< INT_MAX-(C+1) |
| if (RHSC->isMaxValue(true)) |
| return insertRangeTest(LHS0, LHSC->getValue() + 1, RHSC->getValue(), |
| true, true); |
| break; // (X s> 13 & X != 15) -> no change |
| case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT: // (X s> 13 & X s< 15) -> (X-14) u< 1 |
| return insertRangeTest(LHS0, LHSC->getValue() + 1, RHSC->getValue(), true, |
| true); |
| } |
| break; |
| } |
| |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| Value *InstCombiner::foldLogicOfFCmps(FCmpInst *LHS, FCmpInst *RHS, bool IsAnd) { |
| Value *LHS0 = LHS->getOperand(0), *LHS1 = LHS->getOperand(1); |
| Value *RHS0 = RHS->getOperand(0), *RHS1 = RHS->getOperand(1); |
| FCmpInst::Predicate PredL = LHS->getPredicate(), PredR = RHS->getPredicate(); |
| |
| if (LHS0 == RHS1 && RHS0 == LHS1) { |
| // Swap RHS operands to match LHS. |
| PredR = FCmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(PredR); |
| std::swap(RHS0, RHS1); |
| } |
| |
| // Simplify (fcmp cc0 x, y) & (fcmp cc1 x, y). |
| // Suppose the relation between x and y is R, where R is one of |
| // U(1000), L(0100), G(0010) or E(0001), and CC0 and CC1 are the bitmasks for |
| // testing the desired relations. |
| // |
| // Since (R & CC0) and (R & CC1) are either R or 0, we actually have this: |
| // bool(R & CC0) && bool(R & CC1) |
| // = bool((R & CC0) & (R & CC1)) |
| // = bool(R & (CC0 & CC1)) <= by re-association, commutation, and idempotency |
| // |
| // Since (R & CC0) and (R & CC1) are either R or 0, we actually have this: |
| // bool(R & CC0) || bool(R & CC1) |
| // = bool((R & CC0) | (R & CC1)) |
| // = bool(R & (CC0 | CC1)) <= by reversed distribution (contribution? ;) |
| if (LHS0 == RHS0 && LHS1 == RHS1) { |
| unsigned FCmpCodeL = getFCmpCode(PredL); |
| unsigned FCmpCodeR = getFCmpCode(PredR); |
| unsigned NewPred = IsAnd ? FCmpCodeL & FCmpCodeR : FCmpCodeL | FCmpCodeR; |
| return getFCmpValue(NewPred, LHS0, LHS1, Builder); |
| } |
| |
| if ((PredL == FCmpInst::FCMP_ORD && PredR == FCmpInst::FCMP_ORD && IsAnd) || |
| (PredL == FCmpInst::FCMP_UNO && PredR == FCmpInst::FCMP_UNO && !IsAnd)) { |
| if (LHS0->getType() != RHS0->getType()) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // FCmp canonicalization ensures that (fcmp ord/uno X, X) and |
| // (fcmp ord/uno X, C) will be transformed to (fcmp X, +0.0). |
| if (match(LHS1, m_PosZeroFP()) && match(RHS1, m_PosZeroFP())) |
| // Ignore the constants because they are obviously not NANs: |
| // (fcmp ord x, 0.0) & (fcmp ord y, 0.0) -> (fcmp ord x, y) |
| // (fcmp uno x, 0.0) | (fcmp uno y, 0.0) -> (fcmp uno x, y) |
| return Builder.CreateFCmp(PredL, LHS0, RHS0); |
| } |
| |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| /// This a limited reassociation for a special case (see above) where we are |
| /// checking if two values are either both NAN (unordered) or not-NAN (ordered). |
| /// This could be handled more generally in '-reassociation', but it seems like |
| /// an unlikely pattern for a large number of logic ops and fcmps. |
| static Instruction *reassociateFCmps(BinaryOperator &BO, |
| InstCombiner::BuilderTy &Builder) { |
| Instruction::BinaryOps Opcode = BO.getOpcode(); |
| assert((Opcode == Instruction::And || Opcode == Instruction::Or) && |
| "Expecting and/or op for fcmp transform"); |
| |
| // There are 4 commuted variants of the pattern. Canonicalize operands of this |
| // logic op so an fcmp is operand 0 and a matching logic op is operand 1. |
| Value *Op0 = BO.getOperand(0), *Op1 = BO.getOperand(1), *X; |
| FCmpInst::Predicate Pred; |
| if (match(Op1, m_FCmp(Pred, m_Value(), m_AnyZeroFP()))) |
| std::swap(Op0, Op1); |
| |
| // Match inner binop and the predicate for combining 2 NAN checks into 1. |
| BinaryOperator *BO1; |
| FCmpInst::Predicate NanPred = Opcode == Instruction::And ? FCmpInst::FCMP_ORD |
| : FCmpInst::FCMP_UNO; |
| if (!match(Op0, m_FCmp(Pred, m_Value(X), m_AnyZeroFP())) || Pred != NanPred || |
| !match(Op1, m_BinOp(BO1)) || BO1->getOpcode() != Opcode) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // The inner logic op must have a matching fcmp operand. |
| Value *BO10 = BO1->getOperand(0), *BO11 = BO1->getOperand(1), *Y; |
| if (!match(BO10, m_FCmp(Pred, m_Value(Y), m_AnyZeroFP())) || |
| Pred != NanPred || X->getType() != Y->getType()) |
| std::swap(BO10, BO11); |
| |
| if (!match(BO10, m_FCmp(Pred, m_Value(Y), m_AnyZeroFP())) || |
| Pred != NanPred || X->getType() != Y->getType()) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // and (fcmp ord X, 0), (and (fcmp ord Y, 0), Z) --> and (fcmp ord X, Y), Z |
| // or (fcmp uno X, 0), (or (fcmp uno Y, 0), Z) --> or (fcmp uno X, Y), Z |
| Value *NewFCmp = Builder.CreateFCmp(Pred, X, Y); |
| if (auto *NewFCmpInst = dyn_cast<FCmpInst>(NewFCmp)) { |
| // Intersect FMF from the 2 source fcmps. |
| NewFCmpInst->copyIRFlags(Op0); |
| NewFCmpInst->andIRFlags(BO10); |
| } |
| return BinaryOperator::Create(Opcode, NewFCmp, BO11); |
| } |
| |
| /// Match De Morgan's Laws: |
| /// (~A & ~B) == (~(A | B)) |
| /// (~A | ~B) == (~(A & B)) |
| static Instruction *matchDeMorgansLaws(BinaryOperator &I, |
| InstCombiner::BuilderTy &Builder) { |
| auto Opcode = I.getOpcode(); |
| assert((Opcode == Instruction::And || Opcode == Instruction::Or) && |
| "Trying to match De Morgan's Laws with something other than and/or"); |
| |
| // Flip the logic operation. |
| Opcode = (Opcode == Instruction::And) ? Instruction::Or : Instruction::And; |
| |
| Value *A, *B; |
| if (match(I.getOperand(0), m_OneUse(m_Not(m_Value(A)))) && |
| match(I.getOperand(1), m_OneUse(m_Not(m_Value(B)))) && |
| !isFreeToInvert(A, A->hasOneUse()) && |
| !isFreeToInvert(B, B->hasOneUse())) { |
| Value *AndOr = Builder.CreateBinOp(Opcode, A, B, I.getName() + ".demorgan"); |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateNot(AndOr); |
| } |
| |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| bool InstCombiner::shouldOptimizeCast(CastInst *CI) { |
| Value *CastSrc = CI->getOperand(0); |
| |
| // Noop casts and casts of constants should be eliminated trivially. |
| if (CI->getSrcTy() == CI->getDestTy() || isa<Constant>(CastSrc)) |
| return false; |
| |
| // If this cast is paired with another cast that can be eliminated, we prefer |
| // to have it eliminated. |
| if (const auto *PrecedingCI = dyn_cast<CastInst>(CastSrc)) |
| if (isEliminableCastPair(PrecedingCI, CI)) |
| return false; |
| |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| /// Fold {and,or,xor} (cast X), C. |
| static Instruction *foldLogicCastConstant(BinaryOperator &Logic, CastInst *Cast, |
| InstCombiner::BuilderTy &Builder) { |
| Constant *C = dyn_cast<Constant>(Logic.getOperand(1)); |
| if (!C) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| auto LogicOpc = Logic.getOpcode(); |
| Type *DestTy = Logic.getType(); |
| Type *SrcTy = Cast->getSrcTy(); |
| |
| // Move the logic operation ahead of a zext or sext if the constant is |
| // unchanged in the smaller source type. Performing the logic in a smaller |
| // type may provide more information to later folds, and the smaller logic |
| // instruction may be cheaper (particularly in the case of vectors). |
| Value *X; |
| if (match(Cast, m_OneUse(m_ZExt(m_Value(X))))) { |
| Constant *TruncC = ConstantExpr::getTrunc(C, SrcTy); |
| Constant *ZextTruncC = ConstantExpr::getZExt(TruncC, DestTy); |
| if (ZextTruncC == C) { |
| // LogicOpc (zext X), C --> zext (LogicOpc X, C) |
| Value *NewOp = Builder.CreateBinOp(LogicOpc, X, TruncC); |
| return new ZExtInst(NewOp, DestTy); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| if (match(Cast, m_OneUse(m_SExt(m_Value(X))))) { |
| Constant *TruncC = ConstantExpr::getTrunc(C, SrcTy); |
| Constant *SextTruncC = ConstantExpr::getSExt(TruncC, DestTy); |
| if (SextTruncC == C) { |
| // LogicOpc (sext X), C --> sext (LogicOpc X, C) |
| Value *NewOp = Builder.CreateBinOp(LogicOpc, X, TruncC); |
| return new SExtInst(NewOp, DestTy); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| /// Fold {and,or,xor} (cast X), Y. |
| Instruction *InstCombiner::foldCastedBitwiseLogic(BinaryOperator &I) { |
| auto LogicOpc = I.getOpcode(); |
| assert(I.isBitwiseLogicOp() && "Unexpected opcode for bitwise logic folding"); |
| |
| Value *Op0 = I.getOperand(0), *Op1 = I.getOperand(1); |
| CastInst *Cast0 = dyn_cast<CastInst>(Op0); |
| if (!Cast0) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // This must be a cast from an integer or integer vector source type to allow |
| // transformation of the logic operation to the source type. |
| Type *DestTy = I.getType(); |
| Type *SrcTy = Cast0->getSrcTy(); |
| if (!SrcTy->isIntOrIntVectorTy()) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| if (Instruction *Ret = foldLogicCastConstant(I, Cast0, Builder)) |
| return Ret; |
| |
| CastInst *Cast1 = dyn_cast<CastInst>(Op1); |
| if (!Cast1) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // Both operands of the logic operation are casts. The casts must be of the |
| // same type for reduction. |
| auto CastOpcode = Cast0->getOpcode(); |
| if (CastOpcode != Cast1->getOpcode() || SrcTy != Cast1->getSrcTy()) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| Value *Cast0Src = Cast0->getOperand(0); |
| Value *Cast1Src = Cast1->getOperand(0); |
| |
| // fold logic(cast(A), cast(B)) -> cast(logic(A, B)) |
| if (shouldOptimizeCast(Cast0) && shouldOptimizeCast(Cast1)) { |
| Value *NewOp = Builder.CreateBinOp(LogicOpc, Cast0Src, Cast1Src, |
| I.getName()); |
| return CastInst::Create(CastOpcode, NewOp, DestTy); |
| } |
| |
| // For now, only 'and'/'or' have optimizations after this. |
| if (LogicOpc == Instruction::Xor) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // If this is logic(cast(icmp), cast(icmp)), try to fold this even if the |
| // cast is otherwise not optimizable. This happens for vector sexts. |
| ICmpInst *ICmp0 = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(Cast0Src); |
| ICmpInst *ICmp1 = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(Cast1Src); |
| if (ICmp0 && ICmp1) { |
| Value *Res = LogicOpc == Instruction::And ? foldAndOfICmps(ICmp0, ICmp1, I) |
| : foldOrOfICmps(ICmp0, ICmp1, I); |
| if (Res) |
| return CastInst::Create(CastOpcode, Res, DestTy); |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| // If this is logic(cast(fcmp), cast(fcmp)), try to fold this even if the |
| // cast is otherwise not optimizable. This happens for vector sexts. |
| FCmpInst *FCmp0 = dyn_cast<FCmpInst>(Cast0Src); |
| FCmpInst *FCmp1 = dyn_cast<FCmpInst>(Cast1Src); |
| if (FCmp0 && FCmp1) |
| if (Value *R = foldLogicOfFCmps(FCmp0, FCmp1, LogicOpc == Instruction::And)) |
| return CastInst::Create(CastOpcode, R, DestTy); |
| |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| static Instruction *foldAndToXor(BinaryOperator &I, |
| InstCombiner::BuilderTy &Builder) { |
| assert(I.getOpcode() == Instruction::And); |
| Value *Op0 = I.getOperand(0); |
| Value *Op1 = I.getOperand(1); |
| Value *A, *B; |
| |
| // Operand complexity canonicalization guarantees that the 'or' is Op0. |
| // (A | B) & ~(A & B) --> A ^ B |
| // (A | B) & ~(B & A) --> A ^ B |
| if (match(&I, m_BinOp(m_Or(m_Value(A), m_Value(B)), |
| m_Not(m_c_And(m_Deferred(A), m_Deferred(B)))))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateXor(A, B); |
| |
| // (A | ~B) & (~A | B) --> ~(A ^ B) |
| // (A | ~B) & (B | ~A) --> ~(A ^ B) |
| // (~B | A) & (~A | B) --> ~(A ^ B) |
| // (~B | A) & (B | ~A) --> ~(A ^ B) |
| if (Op0->hasOneUse() || Op1->hasOneUse()) |
| if (match(&I, m_BinOp(m_c_Or(m_Value(A), m_Not(m_Value(B))), |
| m_c_Or(m_Not(m_Deferred(A)), m_Deferred(B))))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateNot(Builder.CreateXor(A, B)); |
| |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| static Instruction *foldOrToXor(BinaryOperator &I, |
| InstCombiner::BuilderTy &Builder) { |
| assert(I.getOpcode() == Instruction::Or); |
| Value *Op0 = I.getOperand(0); |
| Value *Op1 = I.getOperand(1); |
| Value *A, *B; |
| |
| // Operand complexity canonicalization guarantees that the 'and' is Op0. |
| // (A & B) | ~(A | B) --> ~(A ^ B) |
| // (A & B) | ~(B | A) --> ~(A ^ B) |
| if (Op0->hasOneUse() || Op1->hasOneUse()) |
| if (match(Op0, m_And(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) && |
| match(Op1, m_Not(m_c_Or(m_Specific(A), m_Specific(B))))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateNot(Builder.CreateXor(A, B)); |
| |
| // (A & ~B) | (~A & B) --> A ^ B |
| // (A & ~B) | (B & ~A) --> A ^ B |
| // (~B & A) | (~A & B) --> A ^ B |
| // (~B & A) | (B & ~A) --> A ^ B |
| if (match(Op0, m_c_And(m_Value(A), m_Not(m_Value(B)))) && |
| match(Op1, m_c_And(m_Not(m_Specific(A)), m_Specific(B)))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateXor(A, B); |
| |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| /// Return true if a constant shift amount is always less than the specified |
| /// bit-width. If not, the shift could create poison in the narrower type. |
| static bool canNarrowShiftAmt(Constant *C, unsigned BitWidth) { |
| if (auto *ScalarC = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(C)) |
| return ScalarC->getZExtValue() < BitWidth; |
| |
| if (C->getType()->isVectorTy()) { |
| // Check each element of a constant vector. |
| unsigned NumElts = C->getType()->getVectorNumElements(); |
| for (unsigned i = 0; i != NumElts; ++i) { |
| Constant *Elt = C->getAggregateElement(i); |
| if (!Elt) |
| return false; |
| if (isa<UndefValue>(Elt)) |
| continue; |
| auto *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Elt); |
| if (!CI || CI->getZExtValue() >= BitWidth) |
| return false; |
| } |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| // The constant is a constant expression or unknown. |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| /// Try to use narrower ops (sink zext ops) for an 'and' with binop operand and |
| /// a common zext operand: and (binop (zext X), C), (zext X). |
| Instruction *InstCombiner::narrowMaskedBinOp(BinaryOperator &And) { |
| // This transform could also apply to {or, and, xor}, but there are better |
| // folds for those cases, so we don't expect those patterns here. AShr is not |
| // handled because it should always be transformed to LShr in this sequence. |
| // The subtract transform is different because it has a constant on the left. |
| // Add/mul commute the constant to RHS; sub with constant RHS becomes add. |
| Value *Op0 = And.getOperand(0), *Op1 = And.getOperand(1); |
| Constant *C; |
| if (!match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_Add(m_Specific(Op1), m_Constant(C)))) && |
| !match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_Mul(m_Specific(Op1), m_Constant(C)))) && |
| !match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_LShr(m_Specific(Op1), m_Constant(C)))) && |
| !match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_Shl(m_Specific(Op1), m_Constant(C)))) && |
| !match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_Sub(m_Constant(C), m_Specific(Op1))))) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| Value *X; |
| if (!match(Op1, m_ZExt(m_Value(X))) || Op1->hasNUsesOrMore(3)) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| Type *Ty = And.getType(); |
| if (!isa<VectorType>(Ty) && !shouldChangeType(Ty, X->getType())) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // If we're narrowing a shift, the shift amount must be safe (less than the |
| // width) in the narrower type. If the shift amount is greater, instsimplify |
| // usually handles that case, but we can't guarantee/assert it. |
| Instruction::BinaryOps Opc = cast<BinaryOperator>(Op0)->getOpcode(); |
| if (Opc == Instruction::LShr || Opc == Instruction::Shl) |
| if (!canNarrowShiftAmt(C, X->getType()->getScalarSizeInBits())) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // and (sub C, (zext X)), (zext X) --> zext (and (sub C', X), X) |
| // and (binop (zext X), C), (zext X) --> zext (and (binop X, C'), X) |
| Value *NewC = ConstantExpr::getTrunc(C, X->getType()); |
| Value *NewBO = Opc == Instruction::Sub ? Builder.CreateBinOp(Opc, NewC, X) |
| : Builder.CreateBinOp(Opc, X, NewC); |
| return new ZExtInst(Builder.CreateAnd(NewBO, X), Ty); |
| } |
| |
| // FIXME: We use commutative matchers (m_c_*) for some, but not all, matches |
| // here. We should standardize that construct where it is needed or choose some |
| // other way to ensure that commutated variants of patterns are not missed. |
| Instruction *InstCombiner::visitAnd(BinaryOperator &I) { |
| if (Value *V = SimplifyAndInst(I.getOperand(0), I.getOperand(1), |
| SQ.getWithInstruction(&I))) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); |
| |
| if (SimplifyAssociativeOrCommutative(I)) |
| return &I; |
| |
| if (Instruction *X = foldVectorBinop(I)) |
| return X; |
| |
| // See if we can simplify any instructions used by the instruction whose sole |
| // purpose is to compute bits we don't care about. |
| if (SimplifyDemandedInstructionBits(I)) |
| return &I; |
| |
| // Do this before using distributive laws to catch simple and/or/not patterns. |
| if (Instruction *Xor = foldAndToXor(I, Builder)) |
| return Xor; |
| |
| // (A|B)&(A|C) -> A|(B&C) etc |
| if (Value *V = SimplifyUsingDistributiveLaws(I)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); |
| |
| if (Value *V = SimplifyBSwap(I, Builder)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); |
| |
| Value *Op0 = I.getOperand(0), *Op1 = I.getOperand(1); |
| const APInt *C; |
| if (match(Op1, m_APInt(C))) { |
| Value *X, *Y; |
| if (match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_LogicalShift(m_One(), m_Value(X)))) && |
| C->isOneValue()) { |
| // (1 << X) & 1 --> zext(X == 0) |
| // (1 >> X) & 1 --> zext(X == 0) |
| Value *IsZero = Builder.CreateICmpEQ(X, ConstantInt::get(I.getType(), 0)); |
| return new ZExtInst(IsZero, I.getType()); |
| } |
| |
| const APInt *XorC; |
| if (match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_Xor(m_Value(X), m_APInt(XorC))))) { |
| // (X ^ C1) & C2 --> (X & C2) ^ (C1&C2) |
| Constant *NewC = ConstantInt::get(I.getType(), *C & *XorC); |
| Value *And = Builder.CreateAnd(X, Op1); |
| And->takeName(Op0); |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateXor(And, NewC); |
| } |
| |
| const APInt *OrC; |
| if (match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_Or(m_Value(X), m_APInt(OrC))))) { |
| // (X | C1) & C2 --> (X & C2^(C1&C2)) | (C1&C2) |
| // NOTE: This reduces the number of bits set in the & mask, which |
| // can expose opportunities for store narrowing for scalars. |
| // NOTE: SimplifyDemandedBits should have already removed bits from C1 |
| // that aren't set in C2. Meaning we can replace (C1&C2) with C1 in |
| // above, but this feels safer. |
| APInt Together = *C & *OrC; |
| Value *And = Builder.CreateAnd(X, ConstantInt::get(I.getType(), |
| Together ^ *C)); |
| And->takeName(Op0); |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateOr(And, ConstantInt::get(I.getType(), |
| Together)); |
| } |
| |
| // If the mask is only needed on one incoming arm, push the 'and' op up. |
| if (match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_Xor(m_Value(X), m_Value(Y)))) || |
| match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_Or(m_Value(X), m_Value(Y))))) { |
| APInt NotAndMask(~(*C)); |
| BinaryOperator::BinaryOps BinOp = cast<BinaryOperator>(Op0)->getOpcode(); |
| if (MaskedValueIsZero(X, NotAndMask, 0, &I)) { |
| // Not masking anything out for the LHS, move mask to RHS. |
| // and ({x}or X, Y), C --> {x}or X, (and Y, C) |
| Value *NewRHS = Builder.CreateAnd(Y, Op1, Y->getName() + ".masked"); |
| return BinaryOperator::Create(BinOp, X, NewRHS); |
| } |
| if (!isa<Constant>(Y) && MaskedValueIsZero(Y, NotAndMask, 0, &I)) { |
| // Not masking anything out for the RHS, move mask to LHS. |
| // and ({x}or X, Y), C --> {x}or (and X, C), Y |
| Value *NewLHS = Builder.CreateAnd(X, Op1, X->getName() + ".masked"); |
| return BinaryOperator::Create(BinOp, NewLHS, Y); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| } |
| |
| if (ConstantInt *AndRHS = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Op1)) { |
| const APInt &AndRHSMask = AndRHS->getValue(); |
| |
| // Optimize a variety of ((val OP C1) & C2) combinations... |
| if (BinaryOperator *Op0I = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(Op0)) { |
| // ((C1 OP zext(X)) & C2) -> zext((C1-X) & C2) if C2 fits in the bitwidth |
| // of X and OP behaves well when given trunc(C1) and X. |
| // TODO: Do this for vectors by using m_APInt isntead of m_ConstantInt. |
| switch (Op0I->getOpcode()) { |
| default: |
| break; |
| case Instruction::Xor: |
| case Instruction::Or: |
| case Instruction::Mul: |
| case Instruction::Add: |
| case Instruction::Sub: |
| Value *X; |
| ConstantInt *C1; |
| // TODO: The one use restrictions could be relaxed a little if the AND |
| // is going to be removed. |
| if (match(Op0I, m_OneUse(m_c_BinOp(m_OneUse(m_ZExt(m_Value(X))), |
| m_ConstantInt(C1))))) { |
| if (AndRHSMask.isIntN(X->getType()->getScalarSizeInBits())) { |
| auto *TruncC1 = ConstantExpr::getTrunc(C1, X->getType()); |
| Value *BinOp; |
| Value *Op0LHS = Op0I->getOperand(0); |
| if (isa<ZExtInst>(Op0LHS)) |
| BinOp = Builder.CreateBinOp(Op0I->getOpcode(), X, TruncC1); |
| else |
| BinOp = Builder.CreateBinOp(Op0I->getOpcode(), TruncC1, X); |
| auto *TruncC2 = ConstantExpr::getTrunc(AndRHS, X->getType()); |
| auto *And = Builder.CreateAnd(BinOp, TruncC2); |
| return new ZExtInst(And, I.getType()); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| if (ConstantInt *Op0CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Op0I->getOperand(1))) |
| if (Instruction *Res = OptAndOp(Op0I, Op0CI, AndRHS, I)) |
| return Res; |
| } |
| |
| // If this is an integer truncation, and if the source is an 'and' with |
| // immediate, transform it. This frequently occurs for bitfield accesses. |
| { |
| Value *X = nullptr; ConstantInt *YC = nullptr; |
| if (match(Op0, m_Trunc(m_And(m_Value(X), m_ConstantInt(YC))))) { |
| // Change: and (trunc (and X, YC) to T), C2 |
| // into : and (trunc X to T), trunc(YC) & C2 |
| // This will fold the two constants together, which may allow |
| // other simplifications. |
| Value *NewCast = Builder.CreateTrunc(X, I.getType(), "and.shrunk"); |
| Constant *C3 = ConstantExpr::getTrunc(YC, I.getType()); |
| C3 = ConstantExpr::getAnd(C3, AndRHS); |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(NewCast, C3); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| if (Instruction *Z = narrowMaskedBinOp(I)) |
| return Z; |
| |
| if (Instruction *FoldedLogic = foldBinOpIntoSelectOrPhi(I)) |
| return FoldedLogic; |
| |
| if (Instruction *DeMorgan = matchDeMorgansLaws(I, Builder)) |
| return DeMorgan; |
| |
| { |
| Value *A, *B, *C; |
| // A & (A ^ B) --> A & ~B |
| if (match(Op1, m_OneUse(m_c_Xor(m_Specific(Op0), m_Value(B))))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(Op0, Builder.CreateNot(B)); |
| // (A ^ B) & A --> A & ~B |
| if (match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_c_Xor(m_Specific(Op1), m_Value(B))))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(Op1, Builder.CreateNot(B)); |
| |
| // (A ^ B) & ((B ^ C) ^ A) -> (A ^ B) & ~C |
| if (match(Op0, m_Xor(m_Value(A), m_Value(B)))) |
| if (match(Op1, m_Xor(m_Xor(m_Specific(B), m_Value(C)), m_Specific(A)))) |
| if (Op1->hasOneUse() || isFreeToInvert(C, C->hasOneUse())) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(Op0, Builder.CreateNot(C)); |
| |
| // ((A ^ C) ^ B) & (B ^ A) -> (B ^ A) & ~C |
| if (match(Op0, m_Xor(m_Xor(m_Value(A), m_Value(C)), m_Value(B)))) |
| if (match(Op1, m_Xor(m_Specific(B), m_Specific(A)))) |
| if (Op0->hasOneUse() || isFreeToInvert(C, C->hasOneUse())) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(Op1, Builder.CreateNot(C)); |
| |
| // (A | B) & ((~A) ^ B) -> (A & B) |
| // (A | B) & (B ^ (~A)) -> (A & B) |
| // (B | A) & ((~A) ^ B) -> (A & B) |
| // (B | A) & (B ^ (~A)) -> (A & B) |
| if (match(Op1, m_c_Xor(m_Not(m_Value(A)), m_Value(B))) && |
| match(Op0, m_c_Or(m_Specific(A), m_Specific(B)))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(A, B); |
| |
| // ((~A) ^ B) & (A | B) -> (A & B) |
| // ((~A) ^ B) & (B | A) -> (A & B) |
| // (B ^ (~A)) & (A | B) -> (A & B) |
| // (B ^ (~A)) & (B | A) -> (A & B) |
| if (match(Op0, m_c_Xor(m_Not(m_Value(A)), m_Value(B))) && |
| match(Op1, m_c_Or(m_Specific(A), m_Specific(B)))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(A, B); |
| } |
| |
| { |
| ICmpInst *LHS = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(Op0); |
| ICmpInst *RHS = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(Op1); |
| if (LHS && RHS) |
| if (Value *Res = foldAndOfICmps(LHS, RHS, I)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, Res); |
| |
| // TODO: Make this recursive; it's a little tricky because an arbitrary |
| // number of 'and' instructions might have to be created. |
| Value *X, *Y; |
| if (LHS && match(Op1, m_OneUse(m_And(m_Value(X), m_Value(Y))))) { |
| if (auto *Cmp = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(X)) |
| if (Value *Res = foldAndOfICmps(LHS, Cmp, I)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder.CreateAnd(Res, Y)); |
| if (auto *Cmp = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(Y)) |
| if (Value *Res = foldAndOfICmps(LHS, Cmp, I)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder.CreateAnd(Res, X)); |
| } |
| if (RHS && match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_And(m_Value(X), m_Value(Y))))) { |
| if (auto *Cmp = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(X)) |
| if (Value *Res = foldAndOfICmps(Cmp, RHS, I)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder.CreateAnd(Res, Y)); |
| if (auto *Cmp = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(Y)) |
| if (Value *Res = foldAndOfICmps(Cmp, RHS, I)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder.CreateAnd(Res, X)); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| if (FCmpInst *LHS = dyn_cast<FCmpInst>(I.getOperand(0))) |
| if (FCmpInst *RHS = dyn_cast<FCmpInst>(I.getOperand(1))) |
| if (Value *Res = foldLogicOfFCmps(LHS, RHS, true)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, Res); |
| |
| if (Instruction *FoldedFCmps = reassociateFCmps(I, Builder)) |
| return FoldedFCmps; |
| |
| if (Instruction *CastedAnd = foldCastedBitwiseLogic(I)) |
| return CastedAnd; |
| |
| // and(sext(A), B) / and(B, sext(A)) --> A ? B : 0, where A is i1 or <N x i1>. |
| Value *A; |
| if (match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_SExt(m_Value(A)))) && |
| A->getType()->isIntOrIntVectorTy(1)) |
| return SelectInst::Create(A, Op1, Constant::getNullValue(I.getType())); |
| if (match(Op1, m_OneUse(m_SExt(m_Value(A)))) && |
| A->getType()->isIntOrIntVectorTy(1)) |
| return SelectInst::Create(A, Op0, Constant::getNullValue(I.getType())); |
| |
| // and(ashr(subNSW(Y, X), ScalarSizeInBits(Y)-1), X) --> X s> Y ? X : 0. |
| { |
| Value *X, *Y; |
| const APInt *ShAmt; |
| Type *Ty = I.getType(); |
| if (match(&I, m_c_And(m_OneUse(m_AShr(m_NSWSub(m_Value(Y), m_Value(X)), |
| m_APInt(ShAmt))), |
| m_Deferred(X))) && |
| *ShAmt == Ty->getScalarSizeInBits() - 1) { |
| Value *NewICmpInst = Builder.CreateICmpSGT(X, Y); |
| return SelectInst::Create(NewICmpInst, X, ConstantInt::getNullValue(Ty)); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| Instruction *InstCombiner::matchBSwap(BinaryOperator &Or) { |
| assert(Or.getOpcode() == Instruction::Or && "bswap requires an 'or'"); |
| Value *Op0 = Or.getOperand(0), *Op1 = Or.getOperand(1); |
| |
| // Look through zero extends. |
| if (Instruction *Ext = dyn_cast<ZExtInst>(Op0)) |
| Op0 = Ext->getOperand(0); |
| |
| if (Instruction *Ext = dyn_cast<ZExtInst>(Op1)) |
| Op1 = Ext->getOperand(0); |
| |
| // (A | B) | C and A | (B | C) -> bswap if possible. |
| bool OrOfOrs = match(Op0, m_Or(m_Value(), m_Value())) || |
| match(Op1, m_Or(m_Value(), m_Value())); |
| |
| // (A >> B) | (C << D) and (A << B) | (B >> C) -> bswap if possible. |
| bool OrOfShifts = match(Op0, m_LogicalShift(m_Value(), m_Value())) && |
| match(Op1, m_LogicalShift(m_Value(), m_Value())); |
| |
| // (A & B) | (C & D) -> bswap if possible. |
| bool OrOfAnds = match(Op0, m_And(m_Value(), m_Value())) && |
| match(Op1, m_And(m_Value(), m_Value())); |
| |
| // (A << B) | (C & D) -> bswap if possible. |
| // The bigger pattern here is ((A & C1) << C2) | ((B >> C2) & C1), which is a |
| // part of the bswap idiom for specific values of C1, C2 (e.g. C1 = 16711935, |
| // C2 = 8 for i32). |
| // This pattern can occur when the operands of the 'or' are not canonicalized |
| // for some reason (not having only one use, for example). |
| bool OrOfAndAndSh = (match(Op0, m_LogicalShift(m_Value(), m_Value())) && |
| match(Op1, m_And(m_Value(), m_Value()))) || |
| (match(Op0, m_And(m_Value(), m_Value())) && |
| match(Op1, m_LogicalShift(m_Value(), m_Value()))); |
| |
| if (!OrOfOrs && !OrOfShifts && !OrOfAnds && !OrOfAndAndSh) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| SmallVector<Instruction*, 4> Insts; |
| if (!recognizeBSwapOrBitReverseIdiom(&Or, true, false, Insts)) |
| return nullptr; |
| Instruction *LastInst = Insts.pop_back_val(); |
| LastInst->removeFromParent(); |
| |
| for (auto *Inst : Insts) |
| Worklist.Add(Inst); |
| return LastInst; |
| } |
| |
| /// Transform UB-safe variants of bitwise rotate to the funnel shift intrinsic. |
| static Instruction *matchRotate(Instruction &Or) { |
| // TODO: Can we reduce the code duplication between this and the related |
| // rotate matching code under visitSelect and visitTrunc? |
| unsigned Width = Or.getType()->getScalarSizeInBits(); |
| if (!isPowerOf2_32(Width)) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // First, find an or'd pair of opposite shifts with the same shifted operand: |
| // or (lshr ShVal, ShAmt0), (shl ShVal, ShAmt1) |
| BinaryOperator *Or0, *Or1; |
| if (!match(Or.getOperand(0), m_BinOp(Or0)) || |
| !match(Or.getOperand(1), m_BinOp(Or1))) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| Value *ShVal, *ShAmt0, *ShAmt1; |
| if (!match(Or0, m_OneUse(m_LogicalShift(m_Value(ShVal), m_Value(ShAmt0)))) || |
| !match(Or1, m_OneUse(m_LogicalShift(m_Specific(ShVal), m_Value(ShAmt1))))) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| BinaryOperator::BinaryOps ShiftOpcode0 = Or0->getOpcode(); |
| BinaryOperator::BinaryOps ShiftOpcode1 = Or1->getOpcode(); |
| if (ShiftOpcode0 == ShiftOpcode1) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // Match the shift amount operands for a rotate pattern. This always matches |
| // a subtraction on the R operand. |
| auto matchShiftAmount = [](Value *L, Value *R, unsigned Width) -> Value * { |
| // The shift amount may be masked with negation: |
| // (shl ShVal, (X & (Width - 1))) | (lshr ShVal, ((-X) & (Width - 1))) |
| Value *X; |
| unsigned Mask = Width - 1; |
| if (match(L, m_And(m_Value(X), m_SpecificInt(Mask))) && |
| match(R, m_And(m_Neg(m_Specific(X)), m_SpecificInt(Mask)))) |
| return X; |
| |
| // Similar to above, but the shift amount may be extended after masking, |
| // so return the extended value as the parameter for the intrinsic. |
| if (match(L, m_ZExt(m_And(m_Value(X), m_SpecificInt(Mask)))) && |
| match(R, m_And(m_Neg(m_ZExt(m_And(m_Specific(X), m_SpecificInt(Mask)))), |
| m_SpecificInt(Mask)))) |
| return L; |
| |
| return nullptr; |
| }; |
| |
| Value *ShAmt = matchShiftAmount(ShAmt0, ShAmt1, Width); |
| bool SubIsOnLHS = false; |
| if (!ShAmt) { |
| ShAmt = matchShiftAmount(ShAmt1, ShAmt0, Width); |
| SubIsOnLHS = true; |
| } |
| if (!ShAmt) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| bool IsFshl = (!SubIsOnLHS && ShiftOpcode0 == BinaryOperator::Shl) || |
| (SubIsOnLHS && ShiftOpcode1 == BinaryOperator::Shl); |
| Intrinsic::ID IID = IsFshl ? Intrinsic::fshl : Intrinsic::fshr; |
| Function *F = Intrinsic::getDeclaration(Or.getModule(), IID, Or.getType()); |
| return IntrinsicInst::Create(F, { ShVal, ShVal, ShAmt }); |
| } |
| |
| /// If all elements of two constant vectors are 0/-1 and inverses, return true. |
| static bool areInverseVectorBitmasks(Constant *C1, Constant *C2) { |
| unsigned NumElts = C1->getType()->getVectorNumElements(); |
| for (unsigned i = 0; i != NumElts; ++i) { |
| Constant *EltC1 = C1->getAggregateElement(i); |
| Constant *EltC2 = C2->getAggregateElement(i); |
| if (!EltC1 || !EltC2) |
| return false; |
| |
| // One element must be all ones, and the other must be all zeros. |
| if (!((match(EltC1, m_Zero()) && match(EltC2, m_AllOnes())) || |
| (match(EltC2, m_Zero()) && match(EltC1, m_AllOnes())))) |
| return false; |
| } |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| /// We have an expression of the form (A & C) | (B & D). If A is a scalar or |
| /// vector composed of all-zeros or all-ones values and is the bitwise 'not' of |
| /// B, it can be used as the condition operand of a select instruction. |
| Value *InstCombiner::getSelectCondition(Value *A, Value *B) { |
| // Step 1: We may have peeked through bitcasts in the caller. |
| // Exit immediately if we don't have (vector) integer types. |
| Type *Ty = A->getType(); |
| if (!Ty->isIntOrIntVectorTy() || !B->getType()->isIntOrIntVectorTy()) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // Step 2: We need 0 or all-1's bitmasks. |
| if (ComputeNumSignBits(A) != Ty->getScalarSizeInBits()) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // Step 3: If B is the 'not' value of A, we have our answer. |
| if (match(A, m_Not(m_Specific(B)))) { |
| // If these are scalars or vectors of i1, A can be used directly. |
| if (Ty->isIntOrIntVectorTy(1)) |
| return A; |
| return Builder.CreateTrunc(A, CmpInst::makeCmpResultType(Ty)); |
| } |
| |
| // If both operands are constants, see if the constants are inverse bitmasks. |
| Constant *AConst, *BConst; |
| if (match(A, m_Constant(AConst)) && match(B, m_Constant(BConst))) |
| if (AConst == ConstantExpr::getNot(BConst)) |
| return Builder.CreateZExtOrTrunc(A, CmpInst::makeCmpResultType(Ty)); |
| |
| // Look for more complex patterns. The 'not' op may be hidden behind various |
| // casts. Look through sexts and bitcasts to find the booleans. |
| Value *Cond; |
| Value *NotB; |
| if (match(A, m_SExt(m_Value(Cond))) && |
| Cond->getType()->isIntOrIntVectorTy(1) && |
| match(B, m_OneUse(m_Not(m_Value(NotB))))) { |
| NotB = peekThroughBitcast(NotB, true); |
| if (match(NotB, m_SExt(m_Specific(Cond)))) |
| return Cond; |
| } |
| |
| // All scalar (and most vector) possibilities should be handled now. |
| // Try more matches that only apply to non-splat constant vectors. |
| if (!Ty->isVectorTy()) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // If both operands are xor'd with constants using the same sexted boolean |
| // operand, see if the constants are inverse bitmasks. |
| // TODO: Use ConstantExpr::getNot()? |
| if (match(A, (m_Xor(m_SExt(m_Value(Cond)), m_Constant(AConst)))) && |
| match(B, (m_Xor(m_SExt(m_Specific(Cond)), m_Constant(BConst)))) && |
| Cond->getType()->isIntOrIntVectorTy(1) && |
| areInverseVectorBitmasks(AConst, BConst)) { |
| AConst = ConstantExpr::getTrunc(AConst, CmpInst::makeCmpResultType(Ty)); |
| return Builder.CreateXor(Cond, AConst); |
| } |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| /// We have an expression of the form (A & C) | (B & D). Try to simplify this |
| /// to "A' ? C : D", where A' is a boolean or vector of booleans. |
| Value *InstCombiner::matchSelectFromAndOr(Value *A, Value *C, Value *B, |
| Value *D) { |
| // The potential condition of the select may be bitcasted. In that case, look |
| // through its bitcast and the corresponding bitcast of the 'not' condition. |
| Type *OrigType = A->getType(); |
| A = peekThroughBitcast(A, true); |
| B = peekThroughBitcast(B, true); |
| if (Value *Cond = getSelectCondition(A, B)) { |
| // ((bc Cond) & C) | ((bc ~Cond) & D) --> bc (select Cond, (bc C), (bc D)) |
| // The bitcasts will either all exist or all not exist. The builder will |
| // not create unnecessary casts if the types already match. |
| Value *BitcastC = Builder.CreateBitCast(C, A->getType()); |
| Value *BitcastD = Builder.CreateBitCast(D, A->getType()); |
| Value *Select = Builder.CreateSelect(Cond, BitcastC, BitcastD); |
| return Builder.CreateBitCast(Select, OrigType); |
| } |
| |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| /// Fold (icmp)|(icmp) if possible. |
| Value *InstCombiner::foldOrOfICmps(ICmpInst *LHS, ICmpInst *RHS, |
| Instruction &CxtI) { |
| const SimplifyQuery Q = SQ.getWithInstruction(&CxtI); |
| |
| // Fold (iszero(A & K1) | iszero(A & K2)) -> (A & (K1 | K2)) != (K1 | K2) |
| // if K1 and K2 are a one-bit mask. |
| if (Value *V = foldAndOrOfICmpsOfAndWithPow2(LHS, RHS, false, CxtI)) |
| return V; |
| |
| ICmpInst::Predicate PredL = LHS->getPredicate(), PredR = RHS->getPredicate(); |
| |
| ConstantInt *LHSC = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(LHS->getOperand(1)); |
| ConstantInt *RHSC = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(RHS->getOperand(1)); |
| |
| // Fold (icmp ult/ule (A + C1), C3) | (icmp ult/ule (A + C2), C3) |
| // --> (icmp ult/ule ((A & ~(C1 ^ C2)) + max(C1, C2)), C3) |
| // The original condition actually refers to the following two ranges: |
| // [MAX_UINT-C1+1, MAX_UINT-C1+1+C3] and [MAX_UINT-C2+1, MAX_UINT-C2+1+C3] |
| // We can fold these two ranges if: |
| // 1) C1 and C2 is unsigned greater than C3. |
| // 2) The two ranges are separated. |
| // 3) C1 ^ C2 is one-bit mask. |
| // 4) LowRange1 ^ LowRange2 and HighRange1 ^ HighRange2 are one-bit mask. |
| // This implies all values in the two ranges differ by exactly one bit. |
| |
| if ((PredL == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT || PredL == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE) && |
| PredL == PredR && LHSC && RHSC && LHS->hasOneUse() && RHS->hasOneUse() && |
| LHSC->getType() == RHSC->getType() && |
| LHSC->getValue() == (RHSC->getValue())) { |
| |
| Value *LAdd = LHS->getOperand(0); |
| Value *RAdd = RHS->getOperand(0); |
| |
| Value *LAddOpnd, *RAddOpnd; |
| ConstantInt *LAddC, *RAddC; |
| if (match(LAdd, m_Add(m_Value(LAddOpnd), m_ConstantInt(LAddC))) && |
| match(RAdd, m_Add(m_Value(RAddOpnd), m_ConstantInt(RAddC))) && |
| LAddC->getValue().ugt(LHSC->getValue()) && |
| RAddC->getValue().ugt(LHSC->getValue())) { |
| |
| APInt DiffC = LAddC->getValue() ^ RAddC->getValue(); |
| if (LAddOpnd == RAddOpnd && DiffC.isPowerOf2()) { |
| ConstantInt *MaxAddC = nullptr; |
| if (LAddC->getValue().ult(RAddC->getValue())) |
| MaxAddC = RAddC; |
| else |
| MaxAddC = LAddC; |
| |
| APInt RRangeLow = -RAddC->getValue(); |
| APInt RRangeHigh = RRangeLow + LHSC->getValue(); |
| APInt LRangeLow = -LAddC->getValue(); |
| APInt LRangeHigh = LRangeLow + LHSC->getValue(); |
| APInt LowRangeDiff = RRangeLow ^ LRangeLow; |
| APInt HighRangeDiff = RRangeHigh ^ LRangeHigh; |
| APInt RangeDiff = LRangeLow.sgt(RRangeLow) ? LRangeLow - RRangeLow |
| : RRangeLow - LRangeLow; |
| |
| if (LowRangeDiff.isPowerOf2() && LowRangeDiff == HighRangeDiff && |
| RangeDiff.ugt(LHSC->getValue())) { |
| Value *MaskC = ConstantInt::get(LAddC->getType(), ~DiffC); |
| |
| Value *NewAnd = Builder.CreateAnd(LAddOpnd, MaskC); |
| Value *NewAdd = Builder.CreateAdd(NewAnd, MaxAddC); |
| return Builder.CreateICmp(LHS->getPredicate(), NewAdd, LHSC); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // (icmp1 A, B) | (icmp2 A, B) --> (icmp3 A, B) |
| if (predicatesFoldable(PredL, PredR)) { |
| if (LHS->getOperand(0) == RHS->getOperand(1) && |
| LHS->getOperand(1) == RHS->getOperand(0)) |
| LHS->swapOperands(); |
| if (LHS->getOperand(0) == RHS->getOperand(0) && |
| LHS->getOperand(1) == RHS->getOperand(1)) { |
| Value *Op0 = LHS->getOperand(0), *Op1 = LHS->getOperand(1); |
| unsigned Code = getICmpCode(LHS) | getICmpCode(RHS); |
| bool IsSigned = LHS->isSigned() || RHS->isSigned(); |
| return getNewICmpValue(Code, IsSigned, Op0, Op1, Builder); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // handle (roughly): |
| // (icmp ne (A & B), C) | (icmp ne (A & D), E) |
| if (Value *V = foldLogOpOfMaskedICmps(LHS, RHS, false, Builder)) |
| return V; |
| |
| Value *LHS0 = LHS->getOperand(0), *RHS0 = RHS->getOperand(0); |
| if (LHS->hasOneUse() || RHS->hasOneUse()) { |
| // (icmp eq B, 0) | (icmp ult A, B) -> (icmp ule A, B-1) |
| // (icmp eq B, 0) | (icmp ugt B, A) -> (icmp ule A, B-1) |
| Value *A = nullptr, *B = nullptr; |
| if (PredL == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ && LHSC && LHSC->isZero()) { |
| B = LHS0; |
| if (PredR == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT && LHS0 == RHS->getOperand(1)) |
| A = RHS0; |
| else if (PredR == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT && LHS0 == RHS0) |
| A = RHS->getOperand(1); |
| } |
| // (icmp ult A, B) | (icmp eq B, 0) -> (icmp ule A, B-1) |
| // (icmp ugt B, A) | (icmp eq B, 0) -> (icmp ule A, B-1) |
| else if (PredR == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ && RHSC && RHSC->isZero()) { |
| B = RHS0; |
| if (PredL == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT && RHS0 == LHS->getOperand(1)) |
| A = LHS0; |
| else if (PredL == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT && LHS0 == RHS0) |
| A = LHS->getOperand(1); |
| } |
| if (A && B) |
| return Builder.CreateICmp( |
| ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE, |
| Builder.CreateAdd(B, ConstantInt::getSigned(B->getType(), -1)), A); |
| } |
| |
| // E.g. (icmp slt x, 0) | (icmp sgt x, n) --> icmp ugt x, n |
| if (Value *V = simplifyRangeCheck(LHS, RHS, /*Inverted=*/true)) |
| return V; |
| |
| // E.g. (icmp sgt x, n) | (icmp slt x, 0) --> icmp ugt x, n |
| if (Value *V = simplifyRangeCheck(RHS, LHS, /*Inverted=*/true)) |
| return V; |
| |
| if (Value *V = foldAndOrOfEqualityCmpsWithConstants(LHS, RHS, false, Builder)) |
| return V; |
| |
| if (Value *V = foldIsPowerOf2(LHS, RHS, false /* JoinedByAnd */, Builder)) |
| return V; |
| |
| if (Value *X = |
| foldUnsignedUnderflowCheck(LHS, RHS, /*IsAnd=*/false, Q, Builder)) |
| return X; |
| if (Value *X = |
| foldUnsignedUnderflowCheck(RHS, LHS, /*IsAnd=*/false, Q, Builder)) |
| return X; |
| |
| // This only handles icmp of constants: (icmp1 A, C1) | (icmp2 B, C2). |
| if (!LHSC || !RHSC) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| if (LHSC == RHSC && PredL == PredR) { |
| // (icmp ne A, 0) | (icmp ne B, 0) --> (icmp ne (A|B), 0) |
| if (PredL == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE && LHSC->isZero()) { |
| Value *NewOr = Builder.CreateOr(LHS0, RHS0); |
| return Builder.CreateICmp(PredL, NewOr, LHSC); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // (icmp ult (X + CA), C1) | (icmp eq X, C2) -> (icmp ule (X + CA), C1) |
| // iff C2 + CA == C1. |
| if (PredL == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT && PredR == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ) { |
| ConstantInt *AddC; |
| if (match(LHS0, m_Add(m_Specific(RHS0), m_ConstantInt(AddC)))) |
| if (RHSC->getValue() + AddC->getValue() == LHSC->getValue()) |
| return Builder.CreateICmpULE(LHS0, LHSC); |
| } |
| |
| // From here on, we only handle: |
| // (icmp1 A, C1) | (icmp2 A, C2) --> something simpler. |
| if (LHS0 != RHS0) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // ICMP_[US][GL]E X, C is folded to ICMP_[US][GL]T elsewhere. |
| if (PredL == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE || PredL == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE || |
| PredR == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE || PredR == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE || |
| PredL == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE || PredL == ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE || |
| PredR == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE || PredR == ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // We can't fold (ugt x, C) | (sgt x, C2). |
| if (!predicatesFoldable(PredL, PredR)) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // Ensure that the larger constant is on the RHS. |
| bool ShouldSwap; |
| if (CmpInst::isSigned(PredL) || |
| (ICmpInst::isEquality(PredL) && CmpInst::isSigned(PredR))) |
| ShouldSwap = LHSC->getValue().sgt(RHSC->getValue()); |
| else |
| ShouldSwap = LHSC->getValue().ugt(RHSC->getValue()); |
| |
| if (ShouldSwap) { |
| std::swap(LHS, RHS); |
| std::swap(LHSC, RHSC); |
| std::swap(PredL, PredR); |
| } |
| |
| // At this point, we know we have two icmp instructions |
| // comparing a value against two constants and or'ing the result |
| // together. Because of the above check, we know that we only have |
| // ICMP_EQ, ICMP_NE, ICMP_LT, and ICMP_GT here. We also know (from the |
| // icmp folding check above), that the two constants are not |
| // equal. |
| assert(LHSC != RHSC && "Compares not folded above?"); |
| |
| switch (PredL) { |
| default: |
| llvm_unreachable("Unknown integer condition code!"); |
| case ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ: |
| switch (PredR) { |
| default: |
| llvm_unreachable("Unknown integer condition code!"); |
| case ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ: |
| // Potential folds for this case should already be handled. |
| break; |
| case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT: |
| // (X == 0 || X u> C) -> (X-1) u>= C |
| if (LHSC->isMinValue(false)) |
| return insertRangeTest(LHS0, LHSC->getValue() + 1, RHSC->getValue() + 1, |
| false, false); |
| // (X == 13 | X u> 14) -> no change |
| break; |
| case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT: |
| // (X == INT_MIN || X s> C) -> (X-(INT_MIN+1)) u>= C-INT_MIN |
| if (LHSC->isMinValue(true)) |
| return insertRangeTest(LHS0, LHSC->getValue() + 1, RHSC->getValue() + 1, |
| true, false); |
| // (X == 13 | X s> 14) -> no change |
| break; |
| } |
| break; |
| case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT: |
| switch (PredR) { |
| default: |
| llvm_unreachable("Unknown integer condition code!"); |
| case ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ: // (X u< 13 | X == 14) -> no change |
| // (X u< C || X == UINT_MAX) => (X-C) u>= UINT_MAX-C |
| if (RHSC->isMaxValue(false)) |
| return insertRangeTest(LHS0, LHSC->getValue(), RHSC->getValue(), |
| false, false); |
| break; |
| case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT: // (X u< 13 | X u> 15) -> (X-13) u> 2 |
| assert(!RHSC->isMaxValue(false) && "Missed icmp simplification"); |
| return insertRangeTest(LHS0, LHSC->getValue(), RHSC->getValue() + 1, |
| false, false); |
| } |
| break; |
| case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT: |
| switch (PredR) { |
| default: |
| llvm_unreachable("Unknown integer condition code!"); |
| case ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ: |
| // (X s< C || X == INT_MAX) => (X-C) u>= INT_MAX-C |
| if (RHSC->isMaxValue(true)) |
| return insertRangeTest(LHS0, LHSC->getValue(), RHSC->getValue(), |
| true, false); |
| // (X s< 13 | X == 14) -> no change |
| break; |
| case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT: // (X s< 13 | X s> 15) -> (X-13) u> 2 |
| assert(!RHSC->isMaxValue(true) && "Missed icmp simplification"); |
| return insertRangeTest(LHS0, LHSC->getValue(), RHSC->getValue() + 1, true, |
| false); |
| } |
| break; |
| } |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| // FIXME: We use commutative matchers (m_c_*) for some, but not all, matches |
| // here. We should standardize that construct where it is needed or choose some |
| // other way to ensure that commutated variants of patterns are not missed. |
| Instruction *InstCombiner::visitOr(BinaryOperator &I) { |
| if (Value *V = SimplifyOrInst(I.getOperand(0), I.getOperand(1), |
| SQ.getWithInstruction(&I))) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); |
| |
| if (SimplifyAssociativeOrCommutative(I)) |
| return &I; |
| |
| if (Instruction *X = foldVectorBinop(I)) |
| return X; |
| |
| // See if we can simplify any instructions used by the instruction whose sole |
| // purpose is to compute bits we don't care about. |
| if (SimplifyDemandedInstructionBits(I)) |
| return &I; |
| |
| // Do this before using distributive laws to catch simple and/or/not patterns. |
| if (Instruction *Xor = foldOrToXor(I, Builder)) |
| return Xor; |
| |
| // (A&B)|(A&C) -> A&(B|C) etc |
| if (Value *V = SimplifyUsingDistributiveLaws(I)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); |
| |
| if (Value *V = SimplifyBSwap(I, Builder)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); |
| |
| if (Instruction *FoldedLogic = foldBinOpIntoSelectOrPhi(I)) |
| return FoldedLogic; |
| |
| if (Instruction *BSwap = matchBSwap(I)) |
| return BSwap; |
| |
| if (Instruction *Rotate = matchRotate(I)) |
| return Rotate; |
| |
| Value *X, *Y; |
| const APInt *CV; |
| if (match(&I, m_c_Or(m_OneUse(m_Xor(m_Value(X), m_APInt(CV))), m_Value(Y))) && |
| !CV->isAllOnesValue() && MaskedValueIsZero(Y, *CV, 0, &I)) { |
| // (X ^ C) | Y -> (X | Y) ^ C iff Y & C == 0 |
| // The check for a 'not' op is for efficiency (if Y is known zero --> ~X). |
| Value *Or = Builder.CreateOr(X, Y); |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateXor(Or, ConstantInt::get(I.getType(), *CV)); |
| } |
| |
| // (A & C)|(B & D) |
| Value *Op0 = I.getOperand(0), *Op1 = I.getOperand(1); |
| Value *A, *B, *C, *D; |
| if (match(Op0, m_And(m_Value(A), m_Value(C))) && |
| match(Op1, m_And(m_Value(B), m_Value(D)))) { |
| ConstantInt *C1 = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(C); |
| ConstantInt *C2 = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(D); |
| if (C1 && C2) { // (A & C1)|(B & C2) |
| Value *V1 = nullptr, *V2 = nullptr; |
| if ((C1->getValue() & C2->getValue()).isNullValue()) { |
| // ((V | N) & C1) | (V & C2) --> (V|N) & (C1|C2) |
| // iff (C1&C2) == 0 and (N&~C1) == 0 |
| if (match(A, m_Or(m_Value(V1), m_Value(V2))) && |
| ((V1 == B && |
| MaskedValueIsZero(V2, ~C1->getValue(), 0, &I)) || // (V|N) |
| (V2 == B && |
| MaskedValueIsZero(V1, ~C1->getValue(), 0, &I)))) // (N|V) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(A, |
| Builder.getInt(C1->getValue()|C2->getValue())); |
| // Or commutes, try both ways. |
| if (match(B, m_Or(m_Value(V1), m_Value(V2))) && |
| ((V1 == A && |
| MaskedValueIsZero(V2, ~C2->getValue(), 0, &I)) || // (V|N) |
| (V2 == A && |
| MaskedValueIsZero(V1, ~C2->getValue(), 0, &I)))) // (N|V) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(B, |
| Builder.getInt(C1->getValue()|C2->getValue())); |
| |
| // ((V|C3)&C1) | ((V|C4)&C2) --> (V|C3|C4)&(C1|C2) |
| // iff (C1&C2) == 0 and (C3&~C1) == 0 and (C4&~C2) == 0. |
| ConstantInt *C3 = nullptr, *C4 = nullptr; |
| if (match(A, m_Or(m_Value(V1), m_ConstantInt(C3))) && |
| (C3->getValue() & ~C1->getValue()).isNullValue() && |
| match(B, m_Or(m_Specific(V1), m_ConstantInt(C4))) && |
| (C4->getValue() & ~C2->getValue()).isNullValue()) { |
| V2 = Builder.CreateOr(V1, ConstantExpr::getOr(C3, C4), "bitfield"); |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(V2, |
| Builder.getInt(C1->getValue()|C2->getValue())); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| if (C1->getValue() == ~C2->getValue()) { |
| Value *X; |
| |
| // ((X|B)&C1)|(B&C2) -> (X&C1) | B iff C1 == ~C2 |
| if (match(A, m_c_Or(m_Value(X), m_Specific(B)))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateOr(Builder.CreateAnd(X, C1), B); |
| // (A&C2)|((X|A)&C1) -> (X&C2) | A iff C1 == ~C2 |
| if (match(B, m_c_Or(m_Specific(A), m_Value(X)))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateOr(Builder.CreateAnd(X, C2), A); |
| |
| // ((X^B)&C1)|(B&C2) -> (X&C1) ^ B iff C1 == ~C2 |
| if (match(A, m_c_Xor(m_Value(X), m_Specific(B)))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateXor(Builder.CreateAnd(X, C1), B); |
| // (A&C2)|((X^A)&C1) -> (X&C2) ^ A iff C1 == ~C2 |
| if (match(B, m_c_Xor(m_Specific(A), m_Value(X)))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateXor(Builder.CreateAnd(X, C2), A); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // Don't try to form a select if it's unlikely that we'll get rid of at |
| // least one of the operands. A select is generally more expensive than the |
| // 'or' that it is replacing. |
| if (Op0->hasOneUse() || Op1->hasOneUse()) { |
| // (Cond & C) | (~Cond & D) -> Cond ? C : D, and commuted variants. |
| if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(A, C, B, D)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); |
| if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(A, C, D, B)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); |
| if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(C, A, B, D)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); |
| if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(C, A, D, B)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); |
| if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(B, D, A, C)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); |
| if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(B, D, C, A)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); |
| if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(D, B, A, C)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); |
| if (Value *V = matchSelectFromAndOr(D, B, C, A)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // (A ^ B) | ((B ^ C) ^ A) -> (A ^ B) | C |
| if (match(Op0, m_Xor(m_Value(A), m_Value(B)))) |
| if (match(Op1, m_Xor(m_Xor(m_Specific(B), m_Value(C)), m_Specific(A)))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateOr(Op0, C); |
| |
| // ((A ^ C) ^ B) | (B ^ A) -> (B ^ A) | C |
| if (match(Op0, m_Xor(m_Xor(m_Value(A), m_Value(C)), m_Value(B)))) |
| if (match(Op1, m_Xor(m_Specific(B), m_Specific(A)))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateOr(Op1, C); |
| |
| // ((B | C) & A) | B -> B | (A & C) |
| if (match(Op0, m_And(m_Or(m_Specific(Op1), m_Value(C)), m_Value(A)))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateOr(Op1, Builder.CreateAnd(A, C)); |
| |
| if (Instruction *DeMorgan = matchDeMorgansLaws(I, Builder)) |
| return DeMorgan; |
| |
| // Canonicalize xor to the RHS. |
| bool SwappedForXor = false; |
| if (match(Op0, m_Xor(m_Value(), m_Value()))) { |
| std::swap(Op0, Op1); |
| SwappedForXor = true; |
| } |
| |
| // A | ( A ^ B) -> A | B |
| // A | (~A ^ B) -> A | ~B |
| // (A & B) | (A ^ B) |
| if (match(Op1, m_Xor(m_Value(A), m_Value(B)))) { |
| if (Op0 == A || Op0 == B) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateOr(A, B); |
| |
| if (match(Op0, m_And(m_Specific(A), m_Specific(B))) || |
| match(Op0, m_And(m_Specific(B), m_Specific(A)))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateOr(A, B); |
| |
| if (Op1->hasOneUse() && match(A, m_Not(m_Specific(Op0)))) { |
| Value *Not = Builder.CreateNot(B, B->getName() + ".not"); |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateOr(Not, Op0); |
| } |
| if (Op1->hasOneUse() && match(B, m_Not(m_Specific(Op0)))) { |
| Value *Not = Builder.CreateNot(A, A->getName() + ".not"); |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateOr(Not, Op0); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // A | ~(A | B) -> A | ~B |
| // A | ~(A ^ B) -> A | ~B |
| if (match(Op1, m_Not(m_Value(A)))) |
| if (BinaryOperator *B = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(A)) |
| if ((Op0 == B->getOperand(0) || Op0 == B->getOperand(1)) && |
| Op1->hasOneUse() && (B->getOpcode() == Instruction::Or || |
| B->getOpcode() == Instruction::Xor)) { |
| Value *NotOp = Op0 == B->getOperand(0) ? B->getOperand(1) : |
| B->getOperand(0); |
| Value *Not = Builder.CreateNot(NotOp, NotOp->getName() + ".not"); |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateOr(Not, Op0); |
| } |
| |
| if (SwappedForXor) |
| std::swap(Op0, Op1); |
| |
| { |
| ICmpInst *LHS = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(Op0); |
| ICmpInst *RHS = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(Op1); |
| if (LHS && RHS) |
| if (Value *Res = foldOrOfICmps(LHS, RHS, I)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, Res); |
| |
| // TODO: Make this recursive; it's a little tricky because an arbitrary |
| // number of 'or' instructions might have to be created. |
| Value *X, *Y; |
| if (LHS && match(Op1, m_OneUse(m_Or(m_Value(X), m_Value(Y))))) { |
| if (auto *Cmp = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(X)) |
| if (Value *Res = foldOrOfICmps(LHS, Cmp, I)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder.CreateOr(Res, Y)); |
| if (auto *Cmp = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(Y)) |
| if (Value *Res = foldOrOfICmps(LHS, Cmp, I)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder.CreateOr(Res, X)); |
| } |
| if (RHS && match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_Or(m_Value(X), m_Value(Y))))) { |
| if (auto *Cmp = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(X)) |
| if (Value *Res = foldOrOfICmps(Cmp, RHS, I)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder.CreateOr(Res, Y)); |
| if (auto *Cmp = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(Y)) |
| if (Value *Res = foldOrOfICmps(Cmp, RHS, I)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder.CreateOr(Res, X)); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| if (FCmpInst *LHS = dyn_cast<FCmpInst>(I.getOperand(0))) |
| if (FCmpInst *RHS = dyn_cast<FCmpInst>(I.getOperand(1))) |
| if (Value *Res = foldLogicOfFCmps(LHS, RHS, false)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, Res); |
| |
| if (Instruction *FoldedFCmps = reassociateFCmps(I, Builder)) |
| return FoldedFCmps; |
| |
| if (Instruction *CastedOr = foldCastedBitwiseLogic(I)) |
| return CastedOr; |
| |
| // or(sext(A), B) / or(B, sext(A)) --> A ? -1 : B, where A is i1 or <N x i1>. |
| if (match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_SExt(m_Value(A)))) && |
| A->getType()->isIntOrIntVectorTy(1)) |
| return SelectInst::Create(A, ConstantInt::getSigned(I.getType(), -1), Op1); |
| if (match(Op1, m_OneUse(m_SExt(m_Value(A)))) && |
| A->getType()->isIntOrIntVectorTy(1)) |
| return SelectInst::Create(A, ConstantInt::getSigned(I.getType(), -1), Op0); |
| |
| // Note: If we've gotten to the point of visiting the outer OR, then the |
| // inner one couldn't be simplified. If it was a constant, then it won't |
| // be simplified by a later pass either, so we try swapping the inner/outer |
| // ORs in the hopes that we'll be able to simplify it this way. |
| // (X|C) | V --> (X|V) | C |
| ConstantInt *CI; |
| if (Op0->hasOneUse() && !isa<ConstantInt>(Op1) && |
| match(Op0, m_Or(m_Value(A), m_ConstantInt(CI)))) { |
| Value *Inner = Builder.CreateOr(A, Op1); |
| Inner->takeName(Op0); |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateOr(Inner, CI); |
| } |
| |
| // Change (or (bool?A:B),(bool?C:D)) --> (bool?(or A,C):(or B,D)) |
| // Since this OR statement hasn't been optimized further yet, we hope |
| // that this transformation will allow the new ORs to be optimized. |
| { |
| Value *X = nullptr, *Y = nullptr; |
| if (Op0->hasOneUse() && Op1->hasOneUse() && |
| match(Op0, m_Select(m_Value(X), m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) && |
| match(Op1, m_Select(m_Value(Y), m_Value(C), m_Value(D))) && X == Y) { |
| Value *orTrue = Builder.CreateOr(A, C); |
| Value *orFalse = Builder.CreateOr(B, D); |
| return SelectInst::Create(X, orTrue, orFalse); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // or(ashr(subNSW(Y, X), ScalarSizeInBits(Y)-1), X) --> X s> Y ? -1 : X. |
| { |
| Value *X, *Y; |
| const APInt *ShAmt; |
| Type *Ty = I.getType(); |
| if (match(&I, m_c_Or(m_OneUse(m_AShr(m_NSWSub(m_Value(Y), m_Value(X)), |
| m_APInt(ShAmt))), |
| m_Deferred(X))) && |
| *ShAmt == Ty->getScalarSizeInBits() - 1) { |
| Value *NewICmpInst = Builder.CreateICmpSGT(X, Y); |
| return SelectInst::Create(NewICmpInst, ConstantInt::getAllOnesValue(Ty), |
| X); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| if (Instruction *V = |
| canonicalizeCondSignextOfHighBitExtractToSignextHighBitExtract(I)) |
| return V; |
| |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| /// A ^ B can be specified using other logic ops in a variety of patterns. We |
| /// can fold these early and efficiently by morphing an existing instruction. |
| static Instruction *foldXorToXor(BinaryOperator &I, |
| InstCombiner::BuilderTy &Builder) { |
| assert(I.getOpcode() == Instruction::Xor); |
| Value *Op0 = I.getOperand(0); |
| Value *Op1 = I.getOperand(1); |
| Value *A, *B; |
| |
| // There are 4 commuted variants for each of the basic patterns. |
| |
| // (A & B) ^ (A | B) -> A ^ B |
| // (A & B) ^ (B | A) -> A ^ B |
| // (A | B) ^ (A & B) -> A ^ B |
| // (A | B) ^ (B & A) -> A ^ B |
| if (match(&I, m_c_Xor(m_And(m_Value(A), m_Value(B)), |
| m_c_Or(m_Deferred(A), m_Deferred(B))))) { |
| I.setOperand(0, A); |
| I.setOperand(1, B); |
| return &I; |
| } |
| |
| // (A | ~B) ^ (~A | B) -> A ^ B |
| // (~B | A) ^ (~A | B) -> A ^ B |
| // (~A | B) ^ (A | ~B) -> A ^ B |
| // (B | ~A) ^ (A | ~B) -> A ^ B |
| if (match(&I, m_Xor(m_c_Or(m_Value(A), m_Not(m_Value(B))), |
| m_c_Or(m_Not(m_Deferred(A)), m_Deferred(B))))) { |
| I.setOperand(0, A); |
| I.setOperand(1, B); |
| return &I; |
| } |
| |
| // (A & ~B) ^ (~A & B) -> A ^ B |
| // (~B & A) ^ (~A & B) -> A ^ B |
| // (~A & B) ^ (A & ~B) -> A ^ B |
| // (B & ~A) ^ (A & ~B) -> A ^ B |
| if (match(&I, m_Xor(m_c_And(m_Value(A), m_Not(m_Value(B))), |
| m_c_And(m_Not(m_Deferred(A)), m_Deferred(B))))) { |
| I.setOperand(0, A); |
| I.setOperand(1, B); |
| return &I; |
| } |
| |
| // For the remaining cases we need to get rid of one of the operands. |
| if (!Op0->hasOneUse() && !Op1->hasOneUse()) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // (A | B) ^ ~(A & B) -> ~(A ^ B) |
| // (A | B) ^ ~(B & A) -> ~(A ^ B) |
| // (A & B) ^ ~(A | B) -> ~(A ^ B) |
| // (A & B) ^ ~(B | A) -> ~(A ^ B) |
| // Complexity sorting ensures the not will be on the right side. |
| if ((match(Op0, m_Or(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) && |
| match(Op1, m_Not(m_c_And(m_Specific(A), m_Specific(B))))) || |
| (match(Op0, m_And(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) && |
| match(Op1, m_Not(m_c_Or(m_Specific(A), m_Specific(B)))))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateNot(Builder.CreateXor(A, B)); |
| |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| Value *InstCombiner::foldXorOfICmps(ICmpInst *LHS, ICmpInst *RHS, |
| BinaryOperator &I) { |
| assert(I.getOpcode() == Instruction::Xor && I.getOperand(0) == LHS && |
| I.getOperand(1) == RHS && "Should be 'xor' with these operands"); |
| |
| if (predicatesFoldable(LHS->getPredicate(), RHS->getPredicate())) { |
| if (LHS->getOperand(0) == RHS->getOperand(1) && |
| LHS->getOperand(1) == RHS->getOperand(0)) |
| LHS->swapOperands(); |
| if (LHS->getOperand(0) == RHS->getOperand(0) && |
| LHS->getOperand(1) == RHS->getOperand(1)) { |
| // (icmp1 A, B) ^ (icmp2 A, B) --> (icmp3 A, B) |
| Value *Op0 = LHS->getOperand(0), *Op1 = LHS->getOperand(1); |
| unsigned Code = getICmpCode(LHS) ^ getICmpCode(RHS); |
| bool IsSigned = LHS->isSigned() || RHS->isSigned(); |
| return getNewICmpValue(Code, IsSigned, Op0, Op1, Builder); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // TODO: This can be generalized to compares of non-signbits using |
| // decomposeBitTestICmp(). It could be enhanced more by using (something like) |
| // foldLogOpOfMaskedICmps(). |
| ICmpInst::Predicate PredL = LHS->getPredicate(), PredR = RHS->getPredicate(); |
| Value *LHS0 = LHS->getOperand(0), *LHS1 = LHS->getOperand(1); |
| Value *RHS0 = RHS->getOperand(0), *RHS1 = RHS->getOperand(1); |
| if ((LHS->hasOneUse() || RHS->hasOneUse()) && |
| LHS0->getType() == RHS0->getType() && |
| LHS0->getType()->isIntOrIntVectorTy()) { |
| // (X > -1) ^ (Y > -1) --> (X ^ Y) < 0 |
| // (X < 0) ^ (Y < 0) --> (X ^ Y) < 0 |
| if ((PredL == CmpInst::ICMP_SGT && match(LHS1, m_AllOnes()) && |
| PredR == CmpInst::ICMP_SGT && match(RHS1, m_AllOnes())) || |
| (PredL == CmpInst::ICMP_SLT && match(LHS1, m_Zero()) && |
| PredR == CmpInst::ICMP_SLT && match(RHS1, m_Zero()))) { |
| Value *Zero = ConstantInt::getNullValue(LHS0->getType()); |
| return Builder.CreateICmpSLT(Builder.CreateXor(LHS0, RHS0), Zero); |
| } |
| // (X > -1) ^ (Y < 0) --> (X ^ Y) > -1 |
| // (X < 0) ^ (Y > -1) --> (X ^ Y) > -1 |
| if ((PredL == CmpInst::ICMP_SGT && match(LHS1, m_AllOnes()) && |
| PredR == CmpInst::ICMP_SLT && match(RHS1, m_Zero())) || |
| (PredL == CmpInst::ICMP_SLT && match(LHS1, m_Zero()) && |
| PredR == CmpInst::ICMP_SGT && match(RHS1, m_AllOnes()))) { |
| Value *MinusOne = ConstantInt::getAllOnesValue(LHS0->getType()); |
| return Builder.CreateICmpSGT(Builder.CreateXor(LHS0, RHS0), MinusOne); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // Instead of trying to imitate the folds for and/or, decompose this 'xor' |
| // into those logic ops. That is, try to turn this into an and-of-icmps |
| // because we have many folds for that pattern. |
| // |
| // This is based on a truth table definition of xor: |
| // X ^ Y --> (X | Y) & !(X & Y) |
| if (Value *OrICmp = SimplifyBinOp(Instruction::Or, LHS, RHS, SQ)) { |
| // TODO: If OrICmp is true, then the definition of xor simplifies to !(X&Y). |
| // TODO: If OrICmp is false, the whole thing is false (InstSimplify?). |
| if (Value *AndICmp = SimplifyBinOp(Instruction::And, LHS, RHS, SQ)) { |
| // TODO: Independently handle cases where the 'and' side is a constant. |
| ICmpInst *X = nullptr, *Y = nullptr; |
| if (OrICmp == LHS && AndICmp == RHS) { |
| // (LHS | RHS) & !(LHS & RHS) --> LHS & !RHS --> X & !Y |
| X = LHS; |
| Y = RHS; |
| } |
| if (OrICmp == RHS && AndICmp == LHS) { |
| // !(LHS & RHS) & (LHS | RHS) --> !LHS & RHS --> !Y & X |
| X = RHS; |
| Y = LHS; |
| } |
| if (X && Y && (Y->hasOneUse() || canFreelyInvertAllUsersOf(Y, &I))) { |
| // Invert the predicate of 'Y', thus inverting its output. |
| Y->setPredicate(Y->getInversePredicate()); |
| // So, are there other uses of Y? |
| if (!Y->hasOneUse()) { |
| // We need to adapt other uses of Y though. Get a value that matches |
| // the original value of Y before inversion. While this increases |
| // immediate instruction count, we have just ensured that all the |
| // users are freely-invertible, so that 'not' *will* get folded away. |
| BuilderTy::InsertPointGuard Guard(Builder); |
| // Set insertion point to right after the Y. |
| Builder.SetInsertPoint(Y->getParent(), ++(Y->getIterator())); |
| Value *NotY = Builder.CreateNot(Y, Y->getName() + ".not"); |
| // Replace all uses of Y (excluding the one in NotY!) with NotY. |
| Y->replaceUsesWithIf(NotY, |
| [NotY](Use &U) { return U.getUser() != NotY; }); |
| } |
| // All done. |
| return Builder.CreateAnd(LHS, RHS); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| /// If we have a masked merge, in the canonical form of: |
| /// (assuming that A only has one use.) |
| /// | A | |B| |
| /// ((x ^ y) & M) ^ y |
| /// | D | |
| /// * If M is inverted: |
| /// | D | |
| /// ((x ^ y) & ~M) ^ y |
| /// We can canonicalize by swapping the final xor operand |
| /// to eliminate the 'not' of the mask. |
| /// ((x ^ y) & M) ^ x |
| /// * If M is a constant, and D has one use, we transform to 'and' / 'or' ops |
| /// because that shortens the dependency chain and improves analysis: |
| /// (x & M) | (y & ~M) |
| static Instruction *visitMaskedMerge(BinaryOperator &I, |
| InstCombiner::BuilderTy &Builder) { |
| Value *B, *X, *D; |
| Value *M; |
| if (!match(&I, m_c_Xor(m_Value(B), |
| m_OneUse(m_c_And( |
| m_CombineAnd(m_c_Xor(m_Deferred(B), m_Value(X)), |
| m_Value(D)), |
| m_Value(M)))))) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| Value *NotM; |
| if (match(M, m_Not(m_Value(NotM)))) { |
| // De-invert the mask and swap the value in B part. |
| Value *NewA = Builder.CreateAnd(D, NotM); |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateXor(NewA, X); |
| } |
| |
| Constant *C; |
| if (D->hasOneUse() && match(M, m_Constant(C))) { |
| // Unfold. |
| Value *LHS = Builder.CreateAnd(X, C); |
| Value *NotC = Builder.CreateNot(C); |
| Value *RHS = Builder.CreateAnd(B, NotC); |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateOr(LHS, RHS); |
| } |
| |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| // Transform |
| // ~(x ^ y) |
| // into: |
| // (~x) ^ y |
| // or into |
| // x ^ (~y) |
| static Instruction *sinkNotIntoXor(BinaryOperator &I, |
| InstCombiner::BuilderTy &Builder) { |
| Value *X, *Y; |
| // FIXME: one-use check is not needed in general, but currently we are unable |
| // to fold 'not' into 'icmp', if that 'icmp' has multiple uses. (D35182) |
| if (!match(&I, m_Not(m_OneUse(m_Xor(m_Value(X), m_Value(Y)))))) |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| // We only want to do the transform if it is free to do. |
| if (isFreeToInvert(X, X->hasOneUse())) { |
| // Ok, good. |
| } else if (isFreeToInvert(Y, Y->hasOneUse())) { |
| std::swap(X, Y); |
| } else |
| return nullptr; |
| |
| Value *NotX = Builder.CreateNot(X, X->getName() + ".not"); |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateXor(NotX, Y, I.getName() + ".demorgan"); |
| } |
| |
| // FIXME: We use commutative matchers (m_c_*) for some, but not all, matches |
| // here. We should standardize that construct where it is needed or choose some |
| // other way to ensure that commutated variants of patterns are not missed. |
| Instruction *InstCombiner::visitXor(BinaryOperator &I) { |
| if (Value *V = SimplifyXorInst(I.getOperand(0), I.getOperand(1), |
| SQ.getWithInstruction(&I))) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); |
| |
| if (SimplifyAssociativeOrCommutative(I)) |
| return &I; |
| |
| if (Instruction *X = foldVectorBinop(I)) |
| return X; |
| |
| if (Instruction *NewXor = foldXorToXor(I, Builder)) |
| return NewXor; |
| |
| // (A&B)^(A&C) -> A&(B^C) etc |
| if (Value *V = SimplifyUsingDistributiveLaws(I)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); |
| |
| // See if we can simplify any instructions used by the instruction whose sole |
| // purpose is to compute bits we don't care about. |
| if (SimplifyDemandedInstructionBits(I)) |
| return &I; |
| |
| if (Value *V = SimplifyBSwap(I, Builder)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); |
| |
| Value *Op0 = I.getOperand(0), *Op1 = I.getOperand(1); |
| |
| // Fold (X & M) ^ (Y & ~M) -> (X & M) | (Y & ~M) |
| // This it a special case in haveNoCommonBitsSet, but the computeKnownBits |
| // calls in there are unnecessary as SimplifyDemandedInstructionBits should |
| // have already taken care of those cases. |
| Value *M; |
| if (match(&I, m_c_Xor(m_c_And(m_Not(m_Value(M)), m_Value()), |
| m_c_And(m_Deferred(M), m_Value())))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateOr(Op0, Op1); |
| |
| // Apply DeMorgan's Law for 'nand' / 'nor' logic with an inverted operand. |
| Value *X, *Y; |
| |
| // We must eliminate the and/or (one-use) for these transforms to not increase |
| // the instruction count. |
| // ~(~X & Y) --> (X | ~Y) |
| // ~(Y & ~X) --> (X | ~Y) |
| if (match(&I, m_Not(m_OneUse(m_c_And(m_Not(m_Value(X)), m_Value(Y)))))) { |
| Value *NotY = Builder.CreateNot(Y, Y->getName() + ".not"); |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateOr(X, NotY); |
| } |
| // ~(~X | Y) --> (X & ~Y) |
| // ~(Y | ~X) --> (X & ~Y) |
| if (match(&I, m_Not(m_OneUse(m_c_Or(m_Not(m_Value(X)), m_Value(Y)))))) { |
| Value *NotY = Builder.CreateNot(Y, Y->getName() + ".not"); |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(X, NotY); |
| } |
| |
| if (Instruction *Xor = visitMaskedMerge(I, Builder)) |
| return Xor; |
| |
| // Is this a 'not' (~) fed by a binary operator? |
| BinaryOperator *NotVal; |
| if (match(&I, m_Not(m_BinOp(NotVal)))) { |
| if (NotVal->getOpcode() == Instruction::And || |
| NotVal->getOpcode() == Instruction::Or) { |
| // Apply DeMorgan's Law when inverts are free: |
| // ~(X & Y) --> (~X | ~Y) |
| // ~(X | Y) --> (~X & ~Y) |
| if (isFreeToInvert(NotVal->getOperand(0), |
| NotVal->getOperand(0)->hasOneUse()) && |
| isFreeToInvert(NotVal->getOperand(1), |
| NotVal->getOperand(1)->hasOneUse())) { |
| Value *NotX = Builder.CreateNot(NotVal->getOperand(0), "notlhs"); |
| Value *NotY = Builder.CreateNot(NotVal->getOperand(1), "notrhs"); |
| if (NotVal->getOpcode() == Instruction::And) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateOr(NotX, NotY); |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(NotX, NotY); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // ~(X - Y) --> ~X + Y |
| if (match(NotVal, m_Sub(m_Value(X), m_Value(Y)))) |
| if (isa<Constant>(X) || NotVal->hasOneUse()) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateAdd(Builder.CreateNot(X), Y); |
| |
| // ~(~X >>s Y) --> (X >>s Y) |
| if (match(NotVal, m_AShr(m_Not(m_Value(X)), m_Value(Y)))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateAShr(X, Y); |
| |
| // If we are inverting a right-shifted constant, we may be able to eliminate |
| // the 'not' by inverting the constant and using the opposite shift type. |
| // Canonicalization rules ensure that only a negative constant uses 'ashr', |
| // but we must check that in case that transform has not fired yet. |
| |
| // ~(C >>s Y) --> ~C >>u Y (when inverting the replicated sign bits) |
| Constant *C; |
| if (match(NotVal, m_AShr(m_Constant(C), m_Value(Y))) && |
| match(C, m_Negative())) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateLShr(ConstantExpr::getNot(C), Y); |
| |
| // ~(C >>u Y) --> ~C >>s Y (when inverting the replicated sign bits) |
| if (match(NotVal, m_LShr(m_Constant(C), m_Value(Y))) && |
| match(C, m_NonNegative())) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateAShr(ConstantExpr::getNot(C), Y); |
| |
| // ~(X + C) --> -(C + 1) - X |
| if (match(Op0, m_Add(m_Value(X), m_Constant(C)))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateSub(ConstantExpr::getNeg(AddOne(C)), X); |
| } |
| |
| // Use DeMorgan and reassociation to eliminate a 'not' op. |
| Constant *C1; |
| if (match(Op1, m_Constant(C1))) { |
| Constant *C2; |
| if (match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_Or(m_Not(m_Value(X)), m_Constant(C2))))) { |
| // (~X | C2) ^ C1 --> ((X & ~C2) ^ -1) ^ C1 --> (X & ~C2) ^ ~C1 |
| Value *And = Builder.CreateAnd(X, ConstantExpr::getNot(C2)); |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateXor(And, ConstantExpr::getNot(C1)); |
| } |
| if (match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_And(m_Not(m_Value(X)), m_Constant(C2))))) { |
| // (~X & C2) ^ C1 --> ((X | ~C2) ^ -1) ^ C1 --> (X | ~C2) ^ ~C1 |
| Value *Or = Builder.CreateOr(X, ConstantExpr::getNot(C2)); |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateXor(Or, ConstantExpr::getNot(C1)); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // not (cmp A, B) = !cmp A, B |
| CmpInst::Predicate Pred; |
| if (match(&I, m_Not(m_OneUse(m_Cmp(Pred, m_Value(), m_Value()))))) { |
| cast<CmpInst>(Op0)->setPredicate(CmpInst::getInversePredicate(Pred)); |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, Op0); |
| } |
| |
| { |
| const APInt *RHSC; |
| if (match(Op1, m_APInt(RHSC))) { |
| Value *X; |
| const APInt *C; |
| if (RHSC->isSignMask() && match(Op0, m_Sub(m_APInt(C), m_Value(X)))) { |
| // (C - X) ^ signmask -> (C + signmask - X) |
| Constant *NewC = ConstantInt::get(I.getType(), *C + *RHSC); |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateSub(NewC, X); |
| } |
| if (RHSC->isSignMask() && match(Op0, m_Add(m_Value(X), m_APInt(C)))) { |
| // (X + C) ^ signmask -> (X + C + signmask) |
| Constant *NewC = ConstantInt::get(I.getType(), *C + *RHSC); |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateAdd(X, NewC); |
| } |
| |
| // (X|C1)^C2 -> X^(C1^C2) iff X&~C1 == 0 |
| if (match(Op0, m_Or(m_Value(X), m_APInt(C))) && |
| MaskedValueIsZero(X, *C, 0, &I)) { |
| Constant *NewC = ConstantInt::get(I.getType(), *C ^ *RHSC); |
| Worklist.Add(cast<Instruction>(Op0)); |
| I.setOperand(0, X); |
| I.setOperand(1, NewC); |
| return &I; |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| if (ConstantInt *RHSC = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Op1)) { |
| if (BinaryOperator *Op0I = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(Op0)) { |
| if (ConstantInt *Op0CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Op0I->getOperand(1))) { |
| if (Op0I->getOpcode() == Instruction::LShr) { |
| // ((X^C1) >> C2) ^ C3 -> (X>>C2) ^ ((C1>>C2)^C3) |
| // E1 = "X ^ C1" |
| BinaryOperator *E1; |
| ConstantInt *C1; |
| if (Op0I->hasOneUse() && |
| (E1 = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(Op0I->getOperand(0))) && |
| E1->getOpcode() == Instruction::Xor && |
| (C1 = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(E1->getOperand(1)))) { |
| // fold (C1 >> C2) ^ C3 |
| ConstantInt *C2 = Op0CI, *C3 = RHSC; |
| APInt FoldConst = C1->getValue().lshr(C2->getValue()); |
| FoldConst ^= C3->getValue(); |
| // Prepare the two operands. |
| Value *Opnd0 = Builder.CreateLShr(E1->getOperand(0), C2); |
| Opnd0->takeName(Op0I); |
| cast<Instruction>(Opnd0)->setDebugLoc(I.getDebugLoc()); |
| Value *FoldVal = ConstantInt::get(Opnd0->getType(), FoldConst); |
| |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateXor(Opnd0, FoldVal); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| if (Instruction *FoldedLogic = foldBinOpIntoSelectOrPhi(I)) |
| return FoldedLogic; |
| |
| // Y ^ (X | Y) --> X & ~Y |
| // Y ^ (Y | X) --> X & ~Y |
| if (match(Op1, m_OneUse(m_c_Or(m_Value(X), m_Specific(Op0))))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(X, Builder.CreateNot(Op0)); |
| // (X | Y) ^ Y --> X & ~Y |
| // (Y | X) ^ Y --> X & ~Y |
| if (match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_c_Or(m_Value(X), m_Specific(Op1))))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(X, Builder.CreateNot(Op1)); |
| |
| // Y ^ (X & Y) --> ~X & Y |
| // Y ^ (Y & X) --> ~X & Y |
| if (match(Op1, m_OneUse(m_c_And(m_Value(X), m_Specific(Op0))))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(Op0, Builder.CreateNot(X)); |
| // (X & Y) ^ Y --> ~X & Y |
| // (Y & X) ^ Y --> ~X & Y |
| // Canonical form is (X & C) ^ C; don't touch that. |
| // TODO: A 'not' op is better for analysis and codegen, but demanded bits must |
| // be fixed to prefer that (otherwise we get infinite looping). |
| if (!match(Op1, m_Constant()) && |
| match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_c_And(m_Value(X), m_Specific(Op1))))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(Op1, Builder.CreateNot(X)); |
| |
| Value *A, *B, *C; |
| // (A ^ B) ^ (A | C) --> (~A & C) ^ B -- There are 4 commuted variants. |
| if (match(&I, m_c_Xor(m_OneUse(m_Xor(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))), |
| m_OneUse(m_c_Or(m_Deferred(A), m_Value(C)))))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateXor( |
| Builder.CreateAnd(Builder.CreateNot(A), C), B); |
| |
| // (A ^ B) ^ (B | C) --> (~B & C) ^ A -- There are 4 commuted variants. |
| if (match(&I, m_c_Xor(m_OneUse(m_Xor(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))), |
| m_OneUse(m_c_Or(m_Deferred(B), m_Value(C)))))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateXor( |
| Builder.CreateAnd(Builder.CreateNot(B), C), A); |
| |
| // (A & B) ^ (A ^ B) -> (A | B) |
| if (match(Op0, m_And(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) && |
| match(Op1, m_c_Xor(m_Specific(A), m_Specific(B)))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateOr(A, B); |
| // (A ^ B) ^ (A & B) -> (A | B) |
| if (match(Op0, m_Xor(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) && |
| match(Op1, m_c_And(m_Specific(A), m_Specific(B)))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateOr(A, B); |
| |
| // (A & ~B) ^ ~A -> ~(A & B) |
| // (~B & A) ^ ~A -> ~(A & B) |
| if (match(Op0, m_c_And(m_Value(A), m_Not(m_Value(B)))) && |
| match(Op1, m_Not(m_Specific(A)))) |
| return BinaryOperator::CreateNot(Builder.CreateAnd(A, B)); |
| |
| if (auto *LHS = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(I.getOperand(0))) |
| if (auto *RHS = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(I.getOperand(1))) |
| if (Value *V = foldXorOfICmps(LHS, RHS, I)) |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, V); |
| |
| if (Instruction *CastedXor = foldCastedBitwiseLogic(I)) |
| return CastedXor; |
| |
| // Canonicalize a shifty way to code absolute value to the common pattern. |
| // There are 4 potential commuted variants. Move the 'ashr' candidate to Op1. |
| // We're relying on the fact that we only do this transform when the shift has |
| // exactly 2 uses and the add has exactly 1 use (otherwise, we might increase |
| // instructions). |
| if (Op0->hasNUses(2)) |
| std::swap(Op0, Op1); |
| |
| const APInt *ShAmt; |
| Type *Ty = I.getType(); |
| if (match(Op1, m_AShr(m_Value(A), m_APInt(ShAmt))) && |
| Op1->hasNUses(2) && *ShAmt == Ty->getScalarSizeInBits() - 1 && |
| match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_c_Add(m_Specific(A), m_Specific(Op1))))) { |
| // B = ashr i32 A, 31 ; smear the sign bit |
| // xor (add A, B), B ; add -1 and flip bits if negative |
| // --> (A < 0) ? -A : A |
| Value *Cmp = Builder.CreateICmpSLT(A, ConstantInt::getNullValue(Ty)); |
| // Copy the nuw/nsw flags from the add to the negate. |
| auto *Add = cast<BinaryOperator>(Op0); |
| Value *Neg = Builder.CreateNeg(A, "", Add->hasNoUnsignedWrap(), |
| Add->hasNoSignedWrap()); |
| return SelectInst::Create(Cmp, Neg, A); |
| } |
| |
| // Eliminate a bitwise 'not' op of 'not' min/max by inverting the min/max: |
| // |
| // %notx = xor i32 %x, -1 |
| // %cmp1 = icmp sgt i32 %notx, %y |
| // %smax = select i1 %cmp1, i32 %notx, i32 %y |
| // %res = xor i32 %smax, -1 |
| // => |
| // %noty = xor i32 %y, -1 |
| // %cmp2 = icmp slt %x, %noty |
| // %res = select i1 %cmp2, i32 %x, i32 %noty |
| // |
| // Same is applicable for smin/umax/umin. |
| if (match(Op1, m_AllOnes()) && Op0->hasOneUse()) { |
| Value *LHS, *RHS; |
| SelectPatternFlavor SPF = matchSelectPattern(Op0, LHS, RHS).Flavor; |
| if (SelectPatternResult::isMinOrMax(SPF)) { |
| // It's possible we get here before the not has been simplified, so make |
| // sure the input to the not isn't freely invertible. |
| if (match(LHS, m_Not(m_Value(X))) && !isFreeToInvert(X, X->hasOneUse())) { |
| Value *NotY = Builder.CreateNot(RHS); |
| return SelectInst::Create( |
| Builder.CreateICmp(getInverseMinMaxPred(SPF), X, NotY), X, NotY); |
| } |
| |
| // It's possible we get here before the not has been simplified, so make |
| // sure the input to the not isn't freely invertible. |
| if (match(RHS, m_Not(m_Value(Y))) && !isFreeToInvert(Y, Y->hasOneUse())) { |
| Value *NotX = Builder.CreateNot(LHS); |
| return SelectInst::Create( |
| Builder.CreateICmp(getInverseMinMaxPred(SPF), NotX, Y), NotX, Y); |
| } |
| |
| // If both sides are freely invertible, then we can get rid of the xor |
| // completely. |
| if (isFreeToInvert(LHS, !LHS->hasNUsesOrMore(3)) && |
| isFreeToInvert(RHS, !RHS->hasNUsesOrMore(3))) { |
| Value *NotLHS = Builder.CreateNot(LHS); |
| Value *NotRHS = Builder.CreateNot(RHS); |
| return SelectInst::Create( |
| Builder.CreateICmp(getInverseMinMaxPred(SPF), NotLHS, NotRHS), |
| NotLHS, NotRHS); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // Pull 'not' into operands of select if both operands are one-use compares. |
| // Inverting the predicates eliminates the 'not' operation. |
| // Example: |
| // not (select ?, (cmp TPred, ?, ?), (cmp FPred, ?, ?) --> |
| // select ?, (cmp InvTPred, ?, ?), (cmp InvFPred, ?, ?) |
| // TODO: Canonicalize by hoisting 'not' into an arm of the select if only |
| // 1 select operand is a cmp? |
| if (auto *Sel = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(Op0)) { |
| auto *CmpT = dyn_cast<CmpInst>(Sel->getTrueValue()); |
| auto *CmpF = dyn_cast<CmpInst>(Sel->getFalseValue()); |
| if (CmpT && CmpF && CmpT->hasOneUse() && CmpF->hasOneUse()) { |
| CmpT->setPredicate(CmpT->getInversePredicate()); |
| CmpF->setPredicate(CmpF->getInversePredicate()); |
| return replaceInstUsesWith(I, Sel); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| if (Instruction *NewXor = sinkNotIntoXor(I, Builder)) |
| return NewXor; |
| |
| return nullptr; |
| } |