| //===- BranchProbabilityInfoTest.cpp - BranchProbabilityInfo unit tests ---===// |
| // |
| // The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure |
| // |
| // This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source |
| // License. See LICENSE.TXT for details. |
| // |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
| |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfo.h" |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h" |
| #include "llvm/AsmParser/Parser.h" |
| #include "llvm/IR/BasicBlock.h" |
| #include "llvm/IR/Constants.h" |
| #include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h" |
| #include "llvm/IR/Function.h" |
| #include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h" |
| #include "llvm/IR/LLVMContext.h" |
| #include "llvm/IR/Module.h" |
| #include "llvm/Support/DataTypes.h" |
| #include "llvm/Support/SourceMgr.h" |
| #include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h" |
| #include "gtest/gtest.h" |
| |
| namespace llvm { |
| namespace { |
| |
| struct BranchProbabilityInfoTest : public testing::Test { |
| std::unique_ptr<BranchProbabilityInfo> BPI; |
| std::unique_ptr<DominatorTree> DT; |
| std::unique_ptr<LoopInfo> LI; |
| LLVMContext C; |
| |
| BranchProbabilityInfo &buildBPI(Function &F) { |
| DT.reset(new DominatorTree(F)); |
| LI.reset(new LoopInfo(*DT)); |
| BPI.reset(new BranchProbabilityInfo(F, *LI)); |
| return *BPI; |
| } |
| |
| std::unique_ptr<Module> makeLLVMModule() { |
| const char *ModuleString = "define void @f() { exit: ret void }\n"; |
| SMDiagnostic Err; |
| return parseAssemblyString(ModuleString, Err, C); |
| } |
| }; |
| |
| TEST_F(BranchProbabilityInfoTest, StressUnreachableHeuristic) { |
| auto M = makeLLVMModule(); |
| Function *F = M->getFunction("f"); |
| |
| // define void @f() { |
| // entry: |
| // switch i32 undef, label %exit, [ |
| // i32 0, label %preexit |
| // ... ;;< Add lots of cases to stress the heuristic. |
| // ] |
| // preexit: |
| // unreachable |
| // exit: |
| // ret void |
| // } |
| |
| auto *ExitBB = &F->back(); |
| auto *EntryBB = BasicBlock::Create(C, "entry", F, /*insertBefore=*/ExitBB); |
| |
| auto *PreExitBB = |
| BasicBlock::Create(C, "preexit", F, /*insertBefore=*/ExitBB); |
| new UnreachableInst(C, PreExitBB); |
| |
| unsigned NumCases = 4096; |
| auto *I32 = IntegerType::get(C, 32); |
| auto *Undef = UndefValue::get(I32); |
| auto *Switch = SwitchInst::Create(Undef, ExitBB, NumCases, EntryBB); |
| for (unsigned I = 0; I < NumCases; ++I) |
| Switch->addCase(ConstantInt::get(I32, I), PreExitBB); |
| |
| BranchProbabilityInfo &BPI = buildBPI(*F); |
| |
| // FIXME: This doesn't seem optimal. Since all of the cases handled by the |
| // switch have the *same* destination block ("preexit"), shouldn't it be the |
| // hot one? I'd expect the results to be reversed here... |
| EXPECT_FALSE(BPI.isEdgeHot(EntryBB, PreExitBB)); |
| EXPECT_TRUE(BPI.isEdgeHot(EntryBB, ExitBB)); |
| } |
| |
| } // end anonymous namespace |
| } // end namespace llvm |