| //===- CodeMoverUtils.cpp - CodeMover Utilities ----------------------------==// | |
| // | |
| // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. | |
| // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. | |
| // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception | |
| // | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| // | |
| // This family of functions perform movements on basic blocks, and instructions | |
| // contained within a function. | |
| // | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/CodeMoverUtils.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/PostDominators.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h" | |
| using namespace llvm; | |
| #define DEBUG_TYPE "codemover-utils" | |
| STATISTIC(HasDependences, | |
| "Cannot move across instructions that has memory dependences"); | |
| STATISTIC(MayThrowException, "Cannot move across instructions that may throw"); | |
| STATISTIC(NotControlFlowEquivalent, | |
| "Instructions are not control flow equivalent"); | |
| STATISTIC(NotMovedPHINode, "Movement of PHINodes are not supported"); | |
| STATISTIC(NotMovedTerminator, "Movement of Terminator are not supported"); | |
| namespace { | |
| /// Represent a control condition. A control condition is a condition of a | |
| /// terminator to decide which successors to execute. The pointer field | |
| /// represents the address of the condition of the terminator. The integer field | |
| /// is a bool, it is true when the basic block is executed when V is true. For | |
| /// example, `br %cond, bb0, bb1` %cond is a control condition of bb0 with the | |
| /// integer field equals to true, while %cond is a control condition of bb1 with | |
| /// the integer field equals to false. | |
| using ControlCondition = PointerIntPair<Value *, 1, bool>; | |
| #ifndef NDEBUG | |
| raw_ostream &operator<<(raw_ostream &OS, const ControlCondition &C) { | |
| OS << "[" << *C.getPointer() << ", " << (C.getInt() ? "true" : "false") | |
| << "]"; | |
| return OS; | |
| } | |
| #endif | |
| /// Represent a set of control conditions required to execute ToBB from FromBB. | |
| class ControlConditions { | |
| using ConditionVectorTy = SmallVector<ControlCondition, 6>; | |
| /// A SmallVector of control conditions. | |
| ConditionVectorTy Conditions; | |
| public: | |
| /// Return a ControlConditions which stores all conditions required to execute | |
| /// \p BB from \p Dominator. If \p MaxLookup is non-zero, it limits the | |
| /// number of conditions to collect. Return std::nullopt if not all conditions | |
| /// are collected successfully, or we hit the limit. | |
| static const std::optional<ControlConditions> | |
| collectControlConditions(const BasicBlock &BB, const BasicBlock &Dominator, | |
| const DominatorTree &DT, | |
| const PostDominatorTree &PDT, | |
| unsigned MaxLookup = 6); | |
| /// Return true if there exists no control conditions required to execute ToBB | |
| /// from FromBB. | |
| bool isUnconditional() const { return Conditions.empty(); } | |
| /// Return a constant reference of Conditions. | |
| const ConditionVectorTy &getControlConditions() const { return Conditions; } | |
| /// Add \p V as one of the ControlCondition in Condition with IsTrueCondition | |
| /// equals to \p True. Return true if inserted successfully. | |
| bool addControlCondition(ControlCondition C); | |
| /// Return true if for all control conditions in Conditions, there exists an | |
| /// equivalent control condition in \p Other.Conditions. | |
| bool isEquivalent(const ControlConditions &Other) const; | |
| /// Return true if \p C1 and \p C2 are equivalent. | |
| static bool isEquivalent(const ControlCondition &C1, | |
| const ControlCondition &C2); | |
| private: | |
| ControlConditions() = default; | |
| static bool isEquivalent(const Value &V1, const Value &V2); | |
| static bool isInverse(const Value &V1, const Value &V2); | |
| }; | |
| } // namespace | |
| static bool domTreeLevelBefore(DominatorTree *DT, const Instruction *InstA, | |
| const Instruction *InstB) { | |
| // Use ordered basic block in case the 2 instructions are in the same | |
| // block. | |
| if (InstA->getParent() == InstB->getParent()) | |
| return InstA->comesBefore(InstB); | |
| DomTreeNode *DA = DT->getNode(InstA->getParent()); | |
| DomTreeNode *DB = DT->getNode(InstB->getParent()); | |
| return DA->getLevel() < DB->getLevel(); | |
| } | |
| const std::optional<ControlConditions> | |
| ControlConditions::collectControlConditions(const BasicBlock &BB, | |
| const BasicBlock &Dominator, | |
| const DominatorTree &DT, | |
| const PostDominatorTree &PDT, | |
| unsigned MaxLookup) { | |
| assert(DT.dominates(&Dominator, &BB) && "Expecting Dominator to dominate BB"); | |
| ControlConditions Conditions; | |
| unsigned NumConditions = 0; | |
| // BB is executed unconditional from itself. | |
| if (&Dominator == &BB) | |
| return Conditions; | |
| const BasicBlock *CurBlock = &BB; | |
| // Walk up the dominator tree from the associated DT node for BB to the | |
| // associated DT node for Dominator. | |
| do { | |
| assert(DT.getNode(CurBlock) && "Expecting a valid DT node for CurBlock"); | |
| BasicBlock *IDom = DT.getNode(CurBlock)->getIDom()->getBlock(); | |
| assert(DT.dominates(&Dominator, IDom) && | |
| "Expecting Dominator to dominate IDom"); | |
| // Limitation: can only handle branch instruction currently. | |
| const BranchInst *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(IDom->getTerminator()); | |
| if (!BI) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| bool Inserted = false; | |
| if (PDT.dominates(CurBlock, IDom)) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << CurBlock->getName() | |
| << " is executed unconditionally from " | |
| << IDom->getName() << "\n"); | |
| } else if (PDT.dominates(CurBlock, BI->getSuccessor(0))) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << CurBlock->getName() << " is executed when \"" | |
| << *BI->getCondition() << "\" is true from " | |
| << IDom->getName() << "\n"); | |
| Inserted = Conditions.addControlCondition( | |
| ControlCondition(BI->getCondition(), true)); | |
| } else if (PDT.dominates(CurBlock, BI->getSuccessor(1))) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << CurBlock->getName() << " is executed when \"" | |
| << *BI->getCondition() << "\" is false from " | |
| << IDom->getName() << "\n"); | |
| Inserted = Conditions.addControlCondition( | |
| ControlCondition(BI->getCondition(), false)); | |
| } else | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| if (Inserted) | |
| ++NumConditions; | |
| if (MaxLookup != 0 && NumConditions > MaxLookup) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| CurBlock = IDom; | |
| } while (CurBlock != &Dominator); | |
| return Conditions; | |
| } | |
| bool ControlConditions::addControlCondition(ControlCondition C) { | |
| bool Inserted = false; | |
| if (none_of(Conditions, [&](ControlCondition &Exists) { | |
| return ControlConditions::isEquivalent(C, Exists); | |
| })) { | |
| Conditions.push_back(C); | |
| Inserted = true; | |
| } | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << (Inserted ? "Inserted " : "Not inserted ") << C << "\n"); | |
| return Inserted; | |
| } | |
| bool ControlConditions::isEquivalent(const ControlConditions &Other) const { | |
| if (Conditions.empty() && Other.Conditions.empty()) | |
| return true; | |
| if (Conditions.size() != Other.Conditions.size()) | |
| return false; | |
| return all_of(Conditions, [&](const ControlCondition &C) { | |
| return any_of(Other.Conditions, [&](const ControlCondition &OtherC) { | |
| return ControlConditions::isEquivalent(C, OtherC); | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| bool ControlConditions::isEquivalent(const ControlCondition &C1, | |
| const ControlCondition &C2) { | |
| if (C1.getInt() == C2.getInt()) { | |
| if (isEquivalent(*C1.getPointer(), *C2.getPointer())) | |
| return true; | |
| } else if (isInverse(*C1.getPointer(), *C2.getPointer())) | |
| return true; | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| // FIXME: Use SCEV and reuse GVN/CSE logic to check for equivalence between | |
| // Values. | |
| // Currently, isEquivalent rely on other passes to ensure equivalent conditions | |
| // have the same value, e.g. GVN. | |
| bool ControlConditions::isEquivalent(const Value &V1, const Value &V2) { | |
| return &V1 == &V2; | |
| } | |
| bool ControlConditions::isInverse(const Value &V1, const Value &V2) { | |
| if (const CmpInst *Cmp1 = dyn_cast<CmpInst>(&V1)) | |
| if (const CmpInst *Cmp2 = dyn_cast<CmpInst>(&V2)) { | |
| if (Cmp1->getPredicate() == Cmp2->getInversePredicate() && | |
| Cmp1->getOperand(0) == Cmp2->getOperand(0) && | |
| Cmp1->getOperand(1) == Cmp2->getOperand(1)) | |
| return true; | |
| if (Cmp1->getPredicate() == | |
| CmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Cmp2->getInversePredicate()) && | |
| Cmp1->getOperand(0) == Cmp2->getOperand(1) && | |
| Cmp1->getOperand(1) == Cmp2->getOperand(0)) | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| bool llvm::isControlFlowEquivalent(const Instruction &I0, const Instruction &I1, | |
| const DominatorTree &DT, | |
| const PostDominatorTree &PDT) { | |
| return isControlFlowEquivalent(*I0.getParent(), *I1.getParent(), DT, PDT); | |
| } | |
| bool llvm::isControlFlowEquivalent(const BasicBlock &BB0, const BasicBlock &BB1, | |
| const DominatorTree &DT, | |
| const PostDominatorTree &PDT) { | |
| if (&BB0 == &BB1) | |
| return true; | |
| if ((DT.dominates(&BB0, &BB1) && PDT.dominates(&BB1, &BB0)) || | |
| (PDT.dominates(&BB0, &BB1) && DT.dominates(&BB1, &BB0))) | |
| return true; | |
| // If the set of conditions required to execute BB0 and BB1 from their common | |
| // dominator are the same, then BB0 and BB1 are control flow equivalent. | |
| const BasicBlock *CommonDominator = DT.findNearestCommonDominator(&BB0, &BB1); | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "The nearest common dominator of " << BB0.getName() | |
| << " and " << BB1.getName() << " is " | |
| << CommonDominator->getName() << "\n"); | |
| const std::optional<ControlConditions> BB0Conditions = | |
| ControlConditions::collectControlConditions(BB0, *CommonDominator, DT, | |
| PDT); | |
| if (BB0Conditions == std::nullopt) | |
| return false; | |
| const std::optional<ControlConditions> BB1Conditions = | |
| ControlConditions::collectControlConditions(BB1, *CommonDominator, DT, | |
| PDT); | |
| if (BB1Conditions == std::nullopt) | |
| return false; | |
| return BB0Conditions->isEquivalent(*BB1Conditions); | |
| } | |
| static bool reportInvalidCandidate(const Instruction &I, | |
| llvm::Statistic &Stat) { | |
| ++Stat; | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Unable to move instruction: " << I << ". " | |
| << Stat.getDesc()); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| /// Collect all instructions in between \p StartInst and \p EndInst, and store | |
| /// them in \p InBetweenInsts. | |
| static void | |
| collectInstructionsInBetween(Instruction &StartInst, const Instruction &EndInst, | |
| SmallPtrSetImpl<Instruction *> &InBetweenInsts) { | |
| assert(InBetweenInsts.empty() && "Expecting InBetweenInsts to be empty"); | |
| /// Get the next instructions of \p I, and push them to \p WorkList. | |
| auto getNextInsts = [](Instruction &I, | |
| SmallPtrSetImpl<Instruction *> &WorkList) { | |
| if (Instruction *NextInst = I.getNextNode()) | |
| WorkList.insert(NextInst); | |
| else { | |
| assert(I.isTerminator() && "Expecting a terminator instruction"); | |
| for (BasicBlock *Succ : successors(&I)) | |
| WorkList.insert(&Succ->front()); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| SmallPtrSet<Instruction *, 10> WorkList; | |
| getNextInsts(StartInst, WorkList); | |
| while (!WorkList.empty()) { | |
| Instruction *CurInst = *WorkList.begin(); | |
| WorkList.erase(CurInst); | |
| if (CurInst == &EndInst) | |
| continue; | |
| if (!InBetweenInsts.insert(CurInst).second) | |
| continue; | |
| getNextInsts(*CurInst, WorkList); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| bool llvm::isSafeToMoveBefore(Instruction &I, Instruction &InsertPoint, | |
| DominatorTree &DT, const PostDominatorTree *PDT, | |
| DependenceInfo *DI, bool CheckForEntireBlock) { | |
| // Skip tests when we don't have PDT or DI | |
| if (!PDT || !DI) | |
| return false; | |
| // Cannot move itself before itself. | |
| if (&I == &InsertPoint) | |
| return false; | |
| // Not moved. | |
| if (I.getNextNode() == &InsertPoint) | |
| return true; | |
| if (isa<PHINode>(I) || isa<PHINode>(InsertPoint)) | |
| return reportInvalidCandidate(I, NotMovedPHINode); | |
| if (I.isTerminator()) | |
| return reportInvalidCandidate(I, NotMovedTerminator); | |
| // TODO remove this limitation. | |
| if (!isControlFlowEquivalent(I, InsertPoint, DT, *PDT)) | |
| return reportInvalidCandidate(I, NotControlFlowEquivalent); | |
| if (isReachedBefore(&I, &InsertPoint, &DT, PDT)) | |
| for (const Use &U : I.uses()) | |
| if (auto *UserInst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(U.getUser())) | |
| if (UserInst != &InsertPoint && !DT.dominates(&InsertPoint, U)) | |
| return false; | |
| if (isReachedBefore(&InsertPoint, &I, &DT, PDT)) | |
| for (const Value *Op : I.operands()) | |
| if (auto *OpInst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Op)) { | |
| if (&InsertPoint == OpInst) | |
| return false; | |
| // If OpInst is an instruction that appears earlier in the same BB as | |
| // I, then it is okay to move since OpInst will still be available. | |
| if (CheckForEntireBlock && I.getParent() == OpInst->getParent() && | |
| DT.dominates(OpInst, &I)) | |
| continue; | |
| if (!DT.dominates(OpInst, &InsertPoint)) | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| DT.updateDFSNumbers(); | |
| const bool MoveForward = domTreeLevelBefore(&DT, &I, &InsertPoint); | |
| Instruction &StartInst = (MoveForward ? I : InsertPoint); | |
| Instruction &EndInst = (MoveForward ? InsertPoint : I); | |
| SmallPtrSet<Instruction *, 10> InstsToCheck; | |
| collectInstructionsInBetween(StartInst, EndInst, InstsToCheck); | |
| if (!MoveForward) | |
| InstsToCheck.insert(&InsertPoint); | |
| // Check if there exists instructions which may throw, may synchonize, or may | |
| // never return, from I to InsertPoint. | |
| if (!isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute(&I)) | |
| if (llvm::any_of(InstsToCheck, [](Instruction *I) { | |
| if (I->mayThrow()) | |
| return true; | |
| const CallBase *CB = dyn_cast<CallBase>(I); | |
| if (!CB) | |
| return false; | |
| if (!CB->hasFnAttr(Attribute::WillReturn)) | |
| return true; | |
| if (!CB->hasFnAttr(Attribute::NoSync)) | |
| return true; | |
| return false; | |
| })) { | |
| return reportInvalidCandidate(I, MayThrowException); | |
| } | |
| // Check if I has any output/flow/anti dependences with instructions from \p | |
| // StartInst to \p EndInst. | |
| if (llvm::any_of(InstsToCheck, [&DI, &I](Instruction *CurInst) { | |
| auto DepResult = DI->depends(&I, CurInst, true); | |
| if (DepResult && (DepResult->isOutput() || DepResult->isFlow() || | |
| DepResult->isAnti())) | |
| return true; | |
| return false; | |
| })) | |
| return reportInvalidCandidate(I, HasDependences); | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| bool llvm::isSafeToMoveBefore(BasicBlock &BB, Instruction &InsertPoint, | |
| DominatorTree &DT, const PostDominatorTree *PDT, | |
| DependenceInfo *DI) { | |
| return llvm::all_of(BB, [&](Instruction &I) { | |
| if (BB.getTerminator() == &I) | |
| return true; | |
| return isSafeToMoveBefore(I, InsertPoint, DT, PDT, DI, | |
| /*CheckForEntireBlock=*/true); | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| void llvm::moveInstructionsToTheBeginning(BasicBlock &FromBB, BasicBlock &ToBB, | |
| DominatorTree &DT, | |
| const PostDominatorTree &PDT, | |
| DependenceInfo &DI) { | |
| for (Instruction &I : | |
| llvm::make_early_inc_range(llvm::drop_begin(llvm::reverse(FromBB)))) { | |
| Instruction *MovePos = ToBB.getFirstNonPHIOrDbg(); | |
| if (isSafeToMoveBefore(I, *MovePos, DT, &PDT, &DI)) | |
| I.moveBefore(MovePos); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| void llvm::moveInstructionsToTheEnd(BasicBlock &FromBB, BasicBlock &ToBB, | |
| DominatorTree &DT, | |
| const PostDominatorTree &PDT, | |
| DependenceInfo &DI) { | |
| Instruction *MovePos = ToBB.getTerminator(); | |
| while (FromBB.size() > 1) { | |
| Instruction &I = FromBB.front(); | |
| if (isSafeToMoveBefore(I, *MovePos, DT, &PDT, &DI)) | |
| I.moveBefore(MovePos); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| bool llvm::nonStrictlyPostDominate(const BasicBlock *ThisBlock, | |
| const BasicBlock *OtherBlock, | |
| const DominatorTree *DT, | |
| const PostDominatorTree *PDT) { | |
| assert(isControlFlowEquivalent(*ThisBlock, *OtherBlock, *DT, *PDT) && | |
| "ThisBlock and OtherBlock must be CFG equivalent!"); | |
| const BasicBlock *CommonDominator = | |
| DT->findNearestCommonDominator(ThisBlock, OtherBlock); | |
| if (CommonDominator == nullptr) | |
| return false; | |
| /// Recursively check the predecessors of \p ThisBlock up to | |
| /// their common dominator, and see if any of them post-dominates | |
| /// \p OtherBlock. | |
| SmallVector<const BasicBlock *, 8> WorkList; | |
| SmallPtrSet<const BasicBlock *, 8> Visited; | |
| WorkList.push_back(ThisBlock); | |
| while (!WorkList.empty()) { | |
| const BasicBlock *CurBlock = WorkList.back(); | |
| WorkList.pop_back(); | |
| Visited.insert(CurBlock); | |
| if (PDT->dominates(CurBlock, OtherBlock)) | |
| return true; | |
| for (const auto *Pred : predecessors(CurBlock)) { | |
| if (Pred == CommonDominator || Visited.count(Pred)) | |
| continue; | |
| WorkList.push_back(Pred); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| bool llvm::isReachedBefore(const Instruction *I0, const Instruction *I1, | |
| const DominatorTree *DT, | |
| const PostDominatorTree *PDT) { | |
| const BasicBlock *BB0 = I0->getParent(); | |
| const BasicBlock *BB1 = I1->getParent(); | |
| if (BB0 == BB1) | |
| return DT->dominates(I0, I1); | |
| return nonStrictlyPostDominate(BB1, BB0, DT, PDT); | |
| } |