| //===- MergeICmps.cpp - Optimize chains of integer comparisons ------------===// | |
| // | |
| // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. | |
| // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. | |
| // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception | |
| // | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| // | |
| // This pass turns chains of integer comparisons into memcmp (the memcmp is | |
| // later typically inlined as a chain of efficient hardware comparisons). This | |
| // typically benefits c++ member or nonmember operator==(). | |
| // | |
| // The basic idea is to replace a longer chain of integer comparisons loaded | |
| // from contiguous memory locations into a shorter chain of larger integer | |
| // comparisons. Benefits are double: | |
| // - There are less jumps, and therefore less opportunities for mispredictions | |
| // and I-cache misses. | |
| // - Code size is smaller, both because jumps are removed and because the | |
| // encoding of a 2*n byte compare is smaller than that of two n-byte | |
| // compares. | |
| // | |
| // Example: | |
| // | |
| // struct S { | |
| // int a; | |
| // char b; | |
| // char c; | |
| // uint16_t d; | |
| // bool operator==(const S& o) const { | |
| // return a == o.a && b == o.b && c == o.c && d == o.d; | |
| // } | |
| // }; | |
| // | |
| // Is optimized as : | |
| // | |
| // bool S::operator==(const S& o) const { | |
| // return memcmp(this, &o, 8) == 0; | |
| // } | |
| // | |
| // Which will later be expanded (ExpandMemCmp) as a single 8-bytes icmp. | |
| // | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| #include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar/MergeICmps.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/DomTreeUpdater.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/GlobalsModRef.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/Loads.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/TargetLibraryInfo.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Function.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h" | |
| #include "llvm/InitializePasses.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Pass.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BuildLibCalls.h" | |
| #include <algorithm> | |
| #include <numeric> | |
| #include <utility> | |
| #include <vector> | |
| using namespace llvm; | |
| namespace { | |
| #define DEBUG_TYPE "mergeicmps" | |
| // A BCE atom "Binary Compare Expression Atom" represents an integer load | |
| // that is a constant offset from a base value, e.g. `a` or `o.c` in the example | |
| // at the top. | |
| struct BCEAtom { | |
| BCEAtom() = default; | |
| BCEAtom(GetElementPtrInst *GEP, LoadInst *LoadI, int BaseId, APInt Offset) | |
| : GEP(GEP), LoadI(LoadI), BaseId(BaseId), Offset(Offset) {} | |
| BCEAtom(const BCEAtom &) = delete; | |
| BCEAtom &operator=(const BCEAtom &) = delete; | |
| BCEAtom(BCEAtom &&that) = default; | |
| BCEAtom &operator=(BCEAtom &&that) { | |
| if (this == &that) | |
| return *this; | |
| GEP = that.GEP; | |
| LoadI = that.LoadI; | |
| BaseId = that.BaseId; | |
| Offset = std::move(that.Offset); | |
| return *this; | |
| } | |
| // We want to order BCEAtoms by (Base, Offset). However we cannot use | |
| // the pointer values for Base because these are non-deterministic. | |
| // To make sure that the sort order is stable, we first assign to each atom | |
| // base value an index based on its order of appearance in the chain of | |
| // comparisons. We call this index `BaseOrdering`. For example, for: | |
| // b[3] == c[2] && a[1] == d[1] && b[4] == c[3] | |
| // | block 1 | | block 2 | | block 3 | | |
| // b gets assigned index 0 and a index 1, because b appears as LHS in block 1, | |
| // which is before block 2. | |
| // We then sort by (BaseOrdering[LHS.Base()], LHS.Offset), which is stable. | |
| bool operator<(const BCEAtom &O) const { | |
| return BaseId != O.BaseId ? BaseId < O.BaseId : Offset.slt(O.Offset); | |
| } | |
| GetElementPtrInst *GEP = nullptr; | |
| LoadInst *LoadI = nullptr; | |
| unsigned BaseId = 0; | |
| APInt Offset; | |
| }; | |
| // A class that assigns increasing ids to values in the order in which they are | |
| // seen. See comment in `BCEAtom::operator<()``. | |
| class BaseIdentifier { | |
| public: | |
| // Returns the id for value `Base`, after assigning one if `Base` has not been | |
| // seen before. | |
| int getBaseId(const Value *Base) { | |
| assert(Base && "invalid base"); | |
| const auto Insertion = BaseToIndex.try_emplace(Base, Order); | |
| if (Insertion.second) | |
| ++Order; | |
| return Insertion.first->second; | |
| } | |
| private: | |
| unsigned Order = 1; | |
| DenseMap<const Value*, int> BaseToIndex; | |
| }; | |
| // If this value is a load from a constant offset w.r.t. a base address, and | |
| // there are no other users of the load or address, returns the base address and | |
| // the offset. | |
| BCEAtom visitICmpLoadOperand(Value *const Val, BaseIdentifier &BaseId) { | |
| auto *const LoadI = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(Val); | |
| if (!LoadI) | |
| return {}; | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "load\n"); | |
| if (LoadI->isUsedOutsideOfBlock(LoadI->getParent())) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "used outside of block\n"); | |
| return {}; | |
| } | |
| // Do not optimize atomic loads to non-atomic memcmp | |
| if (!LoadI->isSimple()) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "volatile or atomic\n"); | |
| return {}; | |
| } | |
| Value *Addr = LoadI->getOperand(0); | |
| if (Addr->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace() != 0) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "from non-zero AddressSpace\n"); | |
| return {}; | |
| } | |
| const auto &DL = LoadI->getModule()->getDataLayout(); | |
| if (!isDereferenceablePointer(Addr, LoadI->getType(), DL)) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "not dereferenceable\n"); | |
| // We need to make sure that we can do comparison in any order, so we | |
| // require memory to be unconditionally dereferenceable. | |
| return {}; | |
| } | |
| APInt Offset = APInt(DL.getPointerTypeSizeInBits(Addr->getType()), 0); | |
| Value *Base = Addr; | |
| auto *GEP = dyn_cast<GetElementPtrInst>(Addr); | |
| if (GEP) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "GEP\n"); | |
| if (GEP->isUsedOutsideOfBlock(LoadI->getParent())) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "used outside of block\n"); | |
| return {}; | |
| } | |
| if (!GEP->accumulateConstantOffset(DL, Offset)) | |
| return {}; | |
| Base = GEP->getPointerOperand(); | |
| } | |
| return BCEAtom(GEP, LoadI, BaseId.getBaseId(Base), Offset); | |
| } | |
| // A comparison between two BCE atoms, e.g. `a == o.a` in the example at the | |
| // top. | |
| // Note: the terminology is misleading: the comparison is symmetric, so there | |
| // is no real {l/r}hs. What we want though is to have the same base on the | |
| // left (resp. right), so that we can detect consecutive loads. To ensure this | |
| // we put the smallest atom on the left. | |
| struct BCECmp { | |
| BCEAtom Lhs; | |
| BCEAtom Rhs; | |
| int SizeBits; | |
| const ICmpInst *CmpI; | |
| BCECmp(BCEAtom L, BCEAtom R, int SizeBits, const ICmpInst *CmpI) | |
| : Lhs(std::move(L)), Rhs(std::move(R)), SizeBits(SizeBits), CmpI(CmpI) { | |
| if (Rhs < Lhs) std::swap(Rhs, Lhs); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| // A basic block with a comparison between two BCE atoms. | |
| // The block might do extra work besides the atom comparison, in which case | |
| // doesOtherWork() returns true. Under some conditions, the block can be | |
| // split into the atom comparison part and the "other work" part | |
| // (see canSplit()). | |
| class BCECmpBlock { | |
| public: | |
| typedef SmallDenseSet<const Instruction *, 8> InstructionSet; | |
| BCECmpBlock(BCECmp Cmp, BasicBlock *BB, InstructionSet BlockInsts) | |
| : BB(BB), BlockInsts(std::move(BlockInsts)), Cmp(std::move(Cmp)) {} | |
| const BCEAtom &Lhs() const { return Cmp.Lhs; } | |
| const BCEAtom &Rhs() const { return Cmp.Rhs; } | |
| int SizeBits() const { return Cmp.SizeBits; } | |
| // Returns true if the block does other works besides comparison. | |
| bool doesOtherWork() const; | |
| // Returns true if the non-BCE-cmp instructions can be separated from BCE-cmp | |
| // instructions in the block. | |
| bool canSplit(AliasAnalysis &AA) const; | |
| // Return true if this all the relevant instructions in the BCE-cmp-block can | |
| // be sunk below this instruction. By doing this, we know we can separate the | |
| // BCE-cmp-block instructions from the non-BCE-cmp-block instructions in the | |
| // block. | |
| bool canSinkBCECmpInst(const Instruction *, AliasAnalysis &AA) const; | |
| // We can separate the BCE-cmp-block instructions and the non-BCE-cmp-block | |
| // instructions. Split the old block and move all non-BCE-cmp-insts into the | |
| // new parent block. | |
| void split(BasicBlock *NewParent, AliasAnalysis &AA) const; | |
| // The basic block where this comparison happens. | |
| BasicBlock *BB; | |
| // Instructions relating to the BCECmp and branch. | |
| InstructionSet BlockInsts; | |
| // The block requires splitting. | |
| bool RequireSplit = false; | |
| // Original order of this block in the chain. | |
| unsigned OrigOrder = 0; | |
| private: | |
| BCECmp Cmp; | |
| }; | |
| bool BCECmpBlock::canSinkBCECmpInst(const Instruction *Inst, | |
| AliasAnalysis &AA) const { | |
| // If this instruction may clobber the loads and is in middle of the BCE cmp | |
| // block instructions, then bail for now. | |
| if (Inst->mayWriteToMemory()) { | |
| auto MayClobber = [&](LoadInst *LI) { | |
| // If a potentially clobbering instruction comes before the load, | |
| // we can still safely sink the load. | |
| return (Inst->getParent() != LI->getParent() || !Inst->comesBefore(LI)) && | |
| isModSet(AA.getModRefInfo(Inst, MemoryLocation::get(LI))); | |
| }; | |
| if (MayClobber(Cmp.Lhs.LoadI) || MayClobber(Cmp.Rhs.LoadI)) | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| // Make sure this instruction does not use any of the BCE cmp block | |
| // instructions as operand. | |
| return llvm::none_of(Inst->operands(), [&](const Value *Op) { | |
| const Instruction *OpI = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Op); | |
| return OpI && BlockInsts.contains(OpI); | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| void BCECmpBlock::split(BasicBlock *NewParent, AliasAnalysis &AA) const { | |
| llvm::SmallVector<Instruction *, 4> OtherInsts; | |
| for (Instruction &Inst : *BB) { | |
| if (BlockInsts.count(&Inst)) | |
| continue; | |
| assert(canSinkBCECmpInst(&Inst, AA) && "Split unsplittable block"); | |
| // This is a non-BCE-cmp-block instruction. And it can be separated | |
| // from the BCE-cmp-block instruction. | |
| OtherInsts.push_back(&Inst); | |
| } | |
| // Do the actual spliting. | |
| for (Instruction *Inst : reverse(OtherInsts)) | |
| Inst->moveBefore(*NewParent, NewParent->begin()); | |
| } | |
| bool BCECmpBlock::canSplit(AliasAnalysis &AA) const { | |
| for (Instruction &Inst : *BB) { | |
| if (!BlockInsts.count(&Inst)) { | |
| if (!canSinkBCECmpInst(&Inst, AA)) | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| bool BCECmpBlock::doesOtherWork() const { | |
| // TODO(courbet): Can we allow some other things ? This is very conservative. | |
| // We might be able to get away with anything does not have any side | |
| // effects outside of the basic block. | |
| // Note: The GEPs and/or loads are not necessarily in the same block. | |
| for (const Instruction &Inst : *BB) { | |
| if (!BlockInsts.count(&Inst)) | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| // Visit the given comparison. If this is a comparison between two valid | |
| // BCE atoms, returns the comparison. | |
| std::optional<BCECmp> visitICmp(const ICmpInst *const CmpI, | |
| const ICmpInst::Predicate ExpectedPredicate, | |
| BaseIdentifier &BaseId) { | |
| // The comparison can only be used once: | |
| // - For intermediate blocks, as a branch condition. | |
| // - For the final block, as an incoming value for the Phi. | |
| // If there are any other uses of the comparison, we cannot merge it with | |
| // other comparisons as we would create an orphan use of the value. | |
| if (!CmpI->hasOneUse()) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "cmp has several uses\n"); | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| } | |
| if (CmpI->getPredicate() != ExpectedPredicate) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "cmp " | |
| << (ExpectedPredicate == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ ? "eq" : "ne") | |
| << "\n"); | |
| auto Lhs = visitICmpLoadOperand(CmpI->getOperand(0), BaseId); | |
| if (!Lhs.BaseId) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| auto Rhs = visitICmpLoadOperand(CmpI->getOperand(1), BaseId); | |
| if (!Rhs.BaseId) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| const auto &DL = CmpI->getModule()->getDataLayout(); | |
| return BCECmp(std::move(Lhs), std::move(Rhs), | |
| DL.getTypeSizeInBits(CmpI->getOperand(0)->getType()), CmpI); | |
| } | |
| // Visit the given comparison block. If this is a comparison between two valid | |
| // BCE atoms, returns the comparison. | |
| std::optional<BCECmpBlock> visitCmpBlock(Value *const Val, | |
| BasicBlock *const Block, | |
| const BasicBlock *const PhiBlock, | |
| BaseIdentifier &BaseId) { | |
| if (Block->empty()) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| auto *const BranchI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(Block->getTerminator()); | |
| if (!BranchI) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "branch\n"); | |
| Value *Cond; | |
| ICmpInst::Predicate ExpectedPredicate; | |
| if (BranchI->isUnconditional()) { | |
| // In this case, we expect an incoming value which is the result of the | |
| // comparison. This is the last link in the chain of comparisons (note | |
| // that this does not mean that this is the last incoming value, blocks | |
| // can be reordered). | |
| Cond = Val; | |
| ExpectedPredicate = ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ; | |
| } else { | |
| // In this case, we expect a constant incoming value (the comparison is | |
| // chained). | |
| const auto *const Const = cast<ConstantInt>(Val); | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "const\n"); | |
| if (!Const->isZero()) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "false\n"); | |
| assert(BranchI->getNumSuccessors() == 2 && "expecting a cond branch"); | |
| BasicBlock *const FalseBlock = BranchI->getSuccessor(1); | |
| Cond = BranchI->getCondition(); | |
| ExpectedPredicate = | |
| FalseBlock == PhiBlock ? ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ : ICmpInst::ICMP_NE; | |
| } | |
| auto *CmpI = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(Cond); | |
| if (!CmpI) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "icmp\n"); | |
| std::optional<BCECmp> Result = visitICmp(CmpI, ExpectedPredicate, BaseId); | |
| if (!Result) | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| BCECmpBlock::InstructionSet BlockInsts( | |
| {Result->Lhs.LoadI, Result->Rhs.LoadI, Result->CmpI, BranchI}); | |
| if (Result->Lhs.GEP) | |
| BlockInsts.insert(Result->Lhs.GEP); | |
| if (Result->Rhs.GEP) | |
| BlockInsts.insert(Result->Rhs.GEP); | |
| return BCECmpBlock(std::move(*Result), Block, BlockInsts); | |
| } | |
| static inline void enqueueBlock(std::vector<BCECmpBlock> &Comparisons, | |
| BCECmpBlock &&Comparison) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Block '" << Comparison.BB->getName() | |
| << "': Found cmp of " << Comparison.SizeBits() | |
| << " bits between " << Comparison.Lhs().BaseId << " + " | |
| << Comparison.Lhs().Offset << " and " | |
| << Comparison.Rhs().BaseId << " + " | |
| << Comparison.Rhs().Offset << "\n"); | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\n"); | |
| Comparison.OrigOrder = Comparisons.size(); | |
| Comparisons.push_back(std::move(Comparison)); | |
| } | |
| // A chain of comparisons. | |
| class BCECmpChain { | |
| public: | |
| using ContiguousBlocks = std::vector<BCECmpBlock>; | |
| BCECmpChain(const std::vector<BasicBlock *> &Blocks, PHINode &Phi, | |
| AliasAnalysis &AA); | |
| bool simplify(const TargetLibraryInfo &TLI, AliasAnalysis &AA, | |
| DomTreeUpdater &DTU); | |
| bool atLeastOneMerged() const { | |
| return any_of(MergedBlocks_, | |
| [](const auto &Blocks) { return Blocks.size() > 1; }); | |
| } | |
| private: | |
| PHINode &Phi_; | |
| // The list of all blocks in the chain, grouped by contiguity. | |
| std::vector<ContiguousBlocks> MergedBlocks_; | |
| // The original entry block (before sorting); | |
| BasicBlock *EntryBlock_; | |
| }; | |
| static bool areContiguous(const BCECmpBlock &First, const BCECmpBlock &Second) { | |
| return First.Lhs().BaseId == Second.Lhs().BaseId && | |
| First.Rhs().BaseId == Second.Rhs().BaseId && | |
| First.Lhs().Offset + First.SizeBits() / 8 == Second.Lhs().Offset && | |
| First.Rhs().Offset + First.SizeBits() / 8 == Second.Rhs().Offset; | |
| } | |
| static unsigned getMinOrigOrder(const BCECmpChain::ContiguousBlocks &Blocks) { | |
| unsigned MinOrigOrder = std::numeric_limits<unsigned>::max(); | |
| for (const BCECmpBlock &Block : Blocks) | |
| MinOrigOrder = std::min(MinOrigOrder, Block.OrigOrder); | |
| return MinOrigOrder; | |
| } | |
| /// Given a chain of comparison blocks, groups the blocks into contiguous | |
| /// ranges that can be merged together into a single comparison. | |
| static std::vector<BCECmpChain::ContiguousBlocks> | |
| mergeBlocks(std::vector<BCECmpBlock> &&Blocks) { | |
| std::vector<BCECmpChain::ContiguousBlocks> MergedBlocks; | |
| // Sort to detect continuous offsets. | |
| llvm::sort(Blocks, | |
| [](const BCECmpBlock &LhsBlock, const BCECmpBlock &RhsBlock) { | |
| return std::tie(LhsBlock.Lhs(), LhsBlock.Rhs()) < | |
| std::tie(RhsBlock.Lhs(), RhsBlock.Rhs()); | |
| }); | |
| BCECmpChain::ContiguousBlocks *LastMergedBlock = nullptr; | |
| for (BCECmpBlock &Block : Blocks) { | |
| if (!LastMergedBlock || !areContiguous(LastMergedBlock->back(), Block)) { | |
| MergedBlocks.emplace_back(); | |
| LastMergedBlock = &MergedBlocks.back(); | |
| } else { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Merging block " << Block.BB->getName() << " into " | |
| << LastMergedBlock->back().BB->getName() << "\n"); | |
| } | |
| LastMergedBlock->push_back(std::move(Block)); | |
| } | |
| // While we allow reordering for merging, do not reorder unmerged comparisons. | |
| // Doing so may introduce branch on poison. | |
| llvm::sort(MergedBlocks, [](const BCECmpChain::ContiguousBlocks &LhsBlocks, | |
| const BCECmpChain::ContiguousBlocks &RhsBlocks) { | |
| return getMinOrigOrder(LhsBlocks) < getMinOrigOrder(RhsBlocks); | |
| }); | |
| return MergedBlocks; | |
| } | |
| BCECmpChain::BCECmpChain(const std::vector<BasicBlock *> &Blocks, PHINode &Phi, | |
| AliasAnalysis &AA) | |
| : Phi_(Phi) { | |
| assert(!Blocks.empty() && "a chain should have at least one block"); | |
| // Now look inside blocks to check for BCE comparisons. | |
| std::vector<BCECmpBlock> Comparisons; | |
| BaseIdentifier BaseId; | |
| for (BasicBlock *const Block : Blocks) { | |
| assert(Block && "invalid block"); | |
| std::optional<BCECmpBlock> Comparison = visitCmpBlock( | |
| Phi.getIncomingValueForBlock(Block), Block, Phi.getParent(), BaseId); | |
| if (!Comparison) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "chain with invalid BCECmpBlock, no merge.\n"); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| if (Comparison->doesOtherWork()) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "block '" << Comparison->BB->getName() | |
| << "' does extra work besides compare\n"); | |
| if (Comparisons.empty()) { | |
| // This is the initial block in the chain, in case this block does other | |
| // work, we can try to split the block and move the irrelevant | |
| // instructions to the predecessor. | |
| // | |
| // If this is not the initial block in the chain, splitting it wont | |
| // work. | |
| // | |
| // As once split, there will still be instructions before the BCE cmp | |
| // instructions that do other work in program order, i.e. within the | |
| // chain before sorting. Unless we can abort the chain at this point | |
| // and start anew. | |
| // | |
| // NOTE: we only handle blocks a with single predecessor for now. | |
| if (Comparison->canSplit(AA)) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() | |
| << "Split initial block '" << Comparison->BB->getName() | |
| << "' that does extra work besides compare\n"); | |
| Comparison->RequireSplit = true; | |
| enqueueBlock(Comparisons, std::move(*Comparison)); | |
| } else { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() | |
| << "ignoring initial block '" << Comparison->BB->getName() | |
| << "' that does extra work besides compare\n"); | |
| } | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| // TODO(courbet): Right now we abort the whole chain. We could be | |
| // merging only the blocks that don't do other work and resume the | |
| // chain from there. For example: | |
| // if (a[0] == b[0]) { // bb1 | |
| // if (a[1] == b[1]) { // bb2 | |
| // some_value = 3; //bb3 | |
| // if (a[2] == b[2]) { //bb3 | |
| // do a ton of stuff //bb4 | |
| // } | |
| // } | |
| // } | |
| // | |
| // This is: | |
| // | |
| // bb1 --eq--> bb2 --eq--> bb3* -eq--> bb4 --+ | |
| // \ \ \ \ | |
| // ne ne ne \ | |
| // \ \ \ v | |
| // +------------+-----------+----------> bb_phi | |
| // | |
| // We can only merge the first two comparisons, because bb3* does | |
| // "other work" (setting some_value to 3). | |
| // We could still merge bb1 and bb2 though. | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| enqueueBlock(Comparisons, std::move(*Comparison)); | |
| } | |
| // It is possible we have no suitable comparison to merge. | |
| if (Comparisons.empty()) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "chain with no BCE basic blocks, no merge\n"); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| EntryBlock_ = Comparisons[0].BB; | |
| MergedBlocks_ = mergeBlocks(std::move(Comparisons)); | |
| } | |
| namespace { | |
| // A class to compute the name of a set of merged basic blocks. | |
| // This is optimized for the common case of no block names. | |
| class MergedBlockName { | |
| // Storage for the uncommon case of several named blocks. | |
| SmallString<16> Scratch; | |
| public: | |
| explicit MergedBlockName(ArrayRef<BCECmpBlock> Comparisons) | |
| : Name(makeName(Comparisons)) {} | |
| const StringRef Name; | |
| private: | |
| StringRef makeName(ArrayRef<BCECmpBlock> Comparisons) { | |
| assert(!Comparisons.empty() && "no basic block"); | |
| // Fast path: only one block, or no names at all. | |
| if (Comparisons.size() == 1) | |
| return Comparisons[0].BB->getName(); | |
| const int size = std::accumulate(Comparisons.begin(), Comparisons.end(), 0, | |
| [](int i, const BCECmpBlock &Cmp) { | |
| return i + Cmp.BB->getName().size(); | |
| }); | |
| if (size == 0) | |
| return StringRef("", 0); | |
| // Slow path: at least two blocks, at least one block with a name. | |
| Scratch.clear(); | |
| // We'll have `size` bytes for name and `Comparisons.size() - 1` bytes for | |
| // separators. | |
| Scratch.reserve(size + Comparisons.size() - 1); | |
| const auto append = [this](StringRef str) { | |
| Scratch.append(str.begin(), str.end()); | |
| }; | |
| append(Comparisons[0].BB->getName()); | |
| for (int I = 1, E = Comparisons.size(); I < E; ++I) { | |
| const BasicBlock *const BB = Comparisons[I].BB; | |
| if (!BB->getName().empty()) { | |
| append("+"); | |
| append(BB->getName()); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return Scratch.str(); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| } // namespace | |
| // Merges the given contiguous comparison blocks into one memcmp block. | |
| static BasicBlock *mergeComparisons(ArrayRef<BCECmpBlock> Comparisons, | |
| BasicBlock *const InsertBefore, | |
| BasicBlock *const NextCmpBlock, | |
| PHINode &Phi, const TargetLibraryInfo &TLI, | |
| AliasAnalysis &AA, DomTreeUpdater &DTU) { | |
| assert(!Comparisons.empty() && "merging zero comparisons"); | |
| LLVMContext &Context = NextCmpBlock->getContext(); | |
| const BCECmpBlock &FirstCmp = Comparisons[0]; | |
| // Create a new cmp block before next cmp block. | |
| BasicBlock *const BB = | |
| BasicBlock::Create(Context, MergedBlockName(Comparisons).Name, | |
| NextCmpBlock->getParent(), InsertBefore); | |
| IRBuilder<> Builder(BB); | |
| // Add the GEPs from the first BCECmpBlock. | |
| Value *Lhs, *Rhs; | |
| if (FirstCmp.Lhs().GEP) | |
| Lhs = Builder.Insert(FirstCmp.Lhs().GEP->clone()); | |
| else | |
| Lhs = FirstCmp.Lhs().LoadI->getPointerOperand(); | |
| if (FirstCmp.Rhs().GEP) | |
| Rhs = Builder.Insert(FirstCmp.Rhs().GEP->clone()); | |
| else | |
| Rhs = FirstCmp.Rhs().LoadI->getPointerOperand(); | |
| Value *IsEqual = nullptr; | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Merging " << Comparisons.size() << " comparisons -> " | |
| << BB->getName() << "\n"); | |
| // If there is one block that requires splitting, we do it now, i.e. | |
| // just before we know we will collapse the chain. The instructions | |
| // can be executed before any of the instructions in the chain. | |
| const auto ToSplit = llvm::find_if( | |
| Comparisons, [](const BCECmpBlock &B) { return B.RequireSplit; }); | |
| if (ToSplit != Comparisons.end()) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Splitting non_BCE work to header\n"); | |
| ToSplit->split(BB, AA); | |
| } | |
| if (Comparisons.size() == 1) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Only one comparison, updating branches\n"); | |
| Value *const LhsLoad = | |
| Builder.CreateLoad(FirstCmp.Lhs().LoadI->getType(), Lhs); | |
| Value *const RhsLoad = | |
| Builder.CreateLoad(FirstCmp.Rhs().LoadI->getType(), Rhs); | |
| // There are no blocks to merge, just do the comparison. | |
| IsEqual = Builder.CreateICmpEQ(LhsLoad, RhsLoad); | |
| } else { | |
| const unsigned TotalSizeBits = std::accumulate( | |
| Comparisons.begin(), Comparisons.end(), 0u, | |
| [](int Size, const BCECmpBlock &C) { return Size + C.SizeBits(); }); | |
| // memcmp expects a 'size_t' argument and returns 'int'. | |
| unsigned SizeTBits = TLI.getSizeTSize(*Phi.getModule()); | |
| unsigned IntBits = TLI.getIntSize(); | |
| // Create memcmp() == 0. | |
| const auto &DL = Phi.getModule()->getDataLayout(); | |
| Value *const MemCmpCall = emitMemCmp( | |
| Lhs, Rhs, | |
| ConstantInt::get(Builder.getIntNTy(SizeTBits), TotalSizeBits / 8), | |
| Builder, DL, &TLI); | |
| IsEqual = Builder.CreateICmpEQ( | |
| MemCmpCall, ConstantInt::get(Builder.getIntNTy(IntBits), 0)); | |
| } | |
| BasicBlock *const PhiBB = Phi.getParent(); | |
| // Add a branch to the next basic block in the chain. | |
| if (NextCmpBlock == PhiBB) { | |
| // Continue to phi, passing it the comparison result. | |
| Builder.CreateBr(PhiBB); | |
| Phi.addIncoming(IsEqual, BB); | |
| DTU.applyUpdates({{DominatorTree::Insert, BB, PhiBB}}); | |
| } else { | |
| // Continue to next block if equal, exit to phi else. | |
| Builder.CreateCondBr(IsEqual, NextCmpBlock, PhiBB); | |
| Phi.addIncoming(ConstantInt::getFalse(Context), BB); | |
| DTU.applyUpdates({{DominatorTree::Insert, BB, NextCmpBlock}, | |
| {DominatorTree::Insert, BB, PhiBB}}); | |
| } | |
| return BB; | |
| } | |
| bool BCECmpChain::simplify(const TargetLibraryInfo &TLI, AliasAnalysis &AA, | |
| DomTreeUpdater &DTU) { | |
| assert(atLeastOneMerged() && "simplifying trivial BCECmpChain"); | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Simplifying comparison chain starting at block " | |
| << EntryBlock_->getName() << "\n"); | |
| // Effectively merge blocks. We go in the reverse direction from the phi block | |
| // so that the next block is always available to branch to. | |
| BasicBlock *InsertBefore = EntryBlock_; | |
| BasicBlock *NextCmpBlock = Phi_.getParent(); | |
| for (const auto &Blocks : reverse(MergedBlocks_)) { | |
| InsertBefore = NextCmpBlock = mergeComparisons( | |
| Blocks, InsertBefore, NextCmpBlock, Phi_, TLI, AA, DTU); | |
| } | |
| // Replace the original cmp chain with the new cmp chain by pointing all | |
| // predecessors of EntryBlock_ to NextCmpBlock instead. This makes all cmp | |
| // blocks in the old chain unreachable. | |
| while (!pred_empty(EntryBlock_)) { | |
| BasicBlock* const Pred = *pred_begin(EntryBlock_); | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Updating jump into old chain from " << Pred->getName() | |
| << "\n"); | |
| Pred->getTerminator()->replaceUsesOfWith(EntryBlock_, NextCmpBlock); | |
| DTU.applyUpdates({{DominatorTree::Delete, Pred, EntryBlock_}, | |
| {DominatorTree::Insert, Pred, NextCmpBlock}}); | |
| } | |
| // If the old cmp chain was the function entry, we need to update the function | |
| // entry. | |
| const bool ChainEntryIsFnEntry = EntryBlock_->isEntryBlock(); | |
| if (ChainEntryIsFnEntry && DTU.hasDomTree()) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Changing function entry from " | |
| << EntryBlock_->getName() << " to " | |
| << NextCmpBlock->getName() << "\n"); | |
| DTU.getDomTree().setNewRoot(NextCmpBlock); | |
| DTU.applyUpdates({{DominatorTree::Delete, NextCmpBlock, EntryBlock_}}); | |
| } | |
| EntryBlock_ = nullptr; | |
| // Delete merged blocks. This also removes incoming values in phi. | |
| SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 16> DeadBlocks; | |
| for (const auto &Blocks : MergedBlocks_) { | |
| for (const BCECmpBlock &Block : Blocks) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Deleting merged block " << Block.BB->getName() | |
| << "\n"); | |
| DeadBlocks.push_back(Block.BB); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| DeleteDeadBlocks(DeadBlocks, &DTU); | |
| MergedBlocks_.clear(); | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| std::vector<BasicBlock *> getOrderedBlocks(PHINode &Phi, | |
| BasicBlock *const LastBlock, | |
| int NumBlocks) { | |
| // Walk up from the last block to find other blocks. | |
| std::vector<BasicBlock *> Blocks(NumBlocks); | |
| assert(LastBlock && "invalid last block"); | |
| BasicBlock *CurBlock = LastBlock; | |
| for (int BlockIndex = NumBlocks - 1; BlockIndex > 0; --BlockIndex) { | |
| if (CurBlock->hasAddressTaken()) { | |
| // Somebody is jumping to the block through an address, all bets are | |
| // off. | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "skip: block " << BlockIndex | |
| << " has its address taken\n"); | |
| return {}; | |
| } | |
| Blocks[BlockIndex] = CurBlock; | |
| auto *SinglePredecessor = CurBlock->getSinglePredecessor(); | |
| if (!SinglePredecessor) { | |
| // The block has two or more predecessors. | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "skip: block " << BlockIndex | |
| << " has two or more predecessors\n"); | |
| return {}; | |
| } | |
| if (Phi.getBasicBlockIndex(SinglePredecessor) < 0) { | |
| // The block does not link back to the phi. | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "skip: block " << BlockIndex | |
| << " does not link back to the phi\n"); | |
| return {}; | |
| } | |
| CurBlock = SinglePredecessor; | |
| } | |
| Blocks[0] = CurBlock; | |
| return Blocks; | |
| } | |
| bool processPhi(PHINode &Phi, const TargetLibraryInfo &TLI, AliasAnalysis &AA, | |
| DomTreeUpdater &DTU) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "processPhi()\n"); | |
| if (Phi.getNumIncomingValues() <= 1) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "skip: only one incoming value in phi\n"); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| // We are looking for something that has the following structure: | |
| // bb1 --eq--> bb2 --eq--> bb3 --eq--> bb4 --+ | |
| // \ \ \ \ | |
| // ne ne ne \ | |
| // \ \ \ v | |
| // +------------+-----------+----------> bb_phi | |
| // | |
| // - The last basic block (bb4 here) must branch unconditionally to bb_phi. | |
| // It's the only block that contributes a non-constant value to the Phi. | |
| // - All other blocks (b1, b2, b3) must have exactly two successors, one of | |
| // them being the phi block. | |
| // - All intermediate blocks (bb2, bb3) must have only one predecessor. | |
| // - Blocks cannot do other work besides the comparison, see doesOtherWork() | |
| // The blocks are not necessarily ordered in the phi, so we start from the | |
| // last block and reconstruct the order. | |
| BasicBlock *LastBlock = nullptr; | |
| for (unsigned I = 0; I < Phi.getNumIncomingValues(); ++I) { | |
| if (isa<ConstantInt>(Phi.getIncomingValue(I))) continue; | |
| if (LastBlock) { | |
| // There are several non-constant values. | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "skip: several non-constant values\n"); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| if (!isa<ICmpInst>(Phi.getIncomingValue(I)) || | |
| cast<ICmpInst>(Phi.getIncomingValue(I))->getParent() != | |
| Phi.getIncomingBlock(I)) { | |
| // Non-constant incoming value is not from a cmp instruction or not | |
| // produced by the last block. We could end up processing the value | |
| // producing block more than once. | |
| // | |
| // This is an uncommon case, so we bail. | |
| LLVM_DEBUG( | |
| dbgs() | |
| << "skip: non-constant value not from cmp or not from last block.\n"); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| LastBlock = Phi.getIncomingBlock(I); | |
| } | |
| if (!LastBlock) { | |
| // There is no non-constant block. | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "skip: no non-constant block\n"); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| if (LastBlock->getSingleSuccessor() != Phi.getParent()) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "skip: last block non-phi successor\n"); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| const auto Blocks = | |
| getOrderedBlocks(Phi, LastBlock, Phi.getNumIncomingValues()); | |
| if (Blocks.empty()) return false; | |
| BCECmpChain CmpChain(Blocks, Phi, AA); | |
| if (!CmpChain.atLeastOneMerged()) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "skip: nothing merged\n"); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| return CmpChain.simplify(TLI, AA, DTU); | |
| } | |
| static bool runImpl(Function &F, const TargetLibraryInfo &TLI, | |
| const TargetTransformInfo &TTI, AliasAnalysis &AA, | |
| DominatorTree *DT) { | |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "MergeICmpsLegacyPass: " << F.getName() << "\n"); | |
| // We only try merging comparisons if the target wants to expand memcmp later. | |
| // The rationale is to avoid turning small chains into memcmp calls. | |
| if (!TTI.enableMemCmpExpansion(F.hasOptSize(), true)) | |
| return false; | |
| // If we don't have memcmp avaiable we can't emit calls to it. | |
| if (!TLI.has(LibFunc_memcmp)) | |
| return false; | |
| DomTreeUpdater DTU(DT, /*PostDominatorTree*/ nullptr, | |
| DomTreeUpdater::UpdateStrategy::Eager); | |
| bool MadeChange = false; | |
| for (BasicBlock &BB : llvm::drop_begin(F)) { | |
| // A Phi operation is always first in a basic block. | |
| if (auto *const Phi = dyn_cast<PHINode>(&*BB.begin())) | |
| MadeChange |= processPhi(*Phi, TLI, AA, DTU); | |
| } | |
| return MadeChange; | |
| } | |
| class MergeICmpsLegacyPass : public FunctionPass { | |
| public: | |
| static char ID; | |
| MergeICmpsLegacyPass() : FunctionPass(ID) { | |
| initializeMergeICmpsLegacyPassPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry()); | |
| } | |
| bool runOnFunction(Function &F) override { | |
| if (skipFunction(F)) return false; | |
| const auto &TLI = getAnalysis<TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass>().getTLI(F); | |
| const auto &TTI = getAnalysis<TargetTransformInfoWrapperPass>().getTTI(F); | |
| // MergeICmps does not need the DominatorTree, but we update it if it's | |
| // already available. | |
| auto *DTWP = getAnalysisIfAvailable<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>(); | |
| auto &AA = getAnalysis<AAResultsWrapperPass>().getAAResults(); | |
| return runImpl(F, TLI, TTI, AA, DTWP ? &DTWP->getDomTree() : nullptr); | |
| } | |
| private: | |
| void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override { | |
| AU.addRequired<TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass>(); | |
| AU.addRequired<TargetTransformInfoWrapperPass>(); | |
| AU.addRequired<AAResultsWrapperPass>(); | |
| AU.addPreserved<GlobalsAAWrapperPass>(); | |
| AU.addPreserved<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>(); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| } // namespace | |
| char MergeICmpsLegacyPass::ID = 0; | |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(MergeICmpsLegacyPass, "mergeicmps", | |
| "Merge contiguous icmps into a memcmp", false, false) | |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass) | |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(TargetTransformInfoWrapperPass) | |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(AAResultsWrapperPass) | |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_END(MergeICmpsLegacyPass, "mergeicmps", | |
| "Merge contiguous icmps into a memcmp", false, false) | |
| Pass *llvm::createMergeICmpsLegacyPass() { return new MergeICmpsLegacyPass(); } | |
| PreservedAnalyses MergeICmpsPass::run(Function &F, | |
| FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) { | |
| auto &TLI = AM.getResult<TargetLibraryAnalysis>(F); | |
| auto &TTI = AM.getResult<TargetIRAnalysis>(F); | |
| auto &AA = AM.getResult<AAManager>(F); | |
| auto *DT = AM.getCachedResult<DominatorTreeAnalysis>(F); | |
| const bool MadeChanges = runImpl(F, TLI, TTI, AA, DT); | |
| if (!MadeChanges) | |
| return PreservedAnalyses::all(); | |
| PreservedAnalyses PA; | |
| PA.preserve<DominatorTreeAnalysis>(); | |
| return PA; | |
| } |