| //===- Dominators.cpp - Dominator Calculation -----------------------------===// | |
| // | |
| // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. | |
| // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. | |
| // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception | |
| // | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| // | |
| // This file implements simple dominator construction algorithms for finding | |
| // forward dominators. Postdominators are available in libanalysis, but are not | |
| // included in libvmcore, because it's not needed. Forward dominators are | |
| // needed to support the Verifier pass. | |
| // | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h" | |
| #include "llvm/ADT/StringRef.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Config/llvm-config.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/CFG.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Function.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Instruction.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h" | |
| #include "llvm/IR/PassManager.h" | |
| #include "llvm/InitializePasses.h" | |
| #include "llvm/PassRegistry.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Support/Casting.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h" | |
| #include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h" | |
| #include <cassert> | |
| namespace llvm { | |
| class Argument; | |
| class Constant; | |
| class Value; | |
| } // namespace llvm | |
| using namespace llvm; | |
| bool llvm::VerifyDomInfo = false; | |
| static cl::opt<bool, true> | |
| VerifyDomInfoX("verify-dom-info", cl::location(VerifyDomInfo), cl::Hidden, | |
| cl::desc("Verify dominator info (time consuming)")); | |
| #ifdef EXPENSIVE_CHECKS | |
| static constexpr bool ExpensiveChecksEnabled = true; | |
| #else | |
| static constexpr bool ExpensiveChecksEnabled = false; | |
| #endif | |
| bool BasicBlockEdge::isSingleEdge() const { | |
| const Instruction *TI = Start->getTerminator(); | |
| unsigned NumEdgesToEnd = 0; | |
| for (unsigned int i = 0, n = TI->getNumSuccessors(); i < n; ++i) { | |
| if (TI->getSuccessor(i) == End) | |
| ++NumEdgesToEnd; | |
| if (NumEdgesToEnd >= 2) | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| assert(NumEdgesToEnd == 1); | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| // DominatorTree Implementation | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| // | |
| // Provide public access to DominatorTree information. Implementation details | |
| // can be found in Dominators.h, GenericDomTree.h, and | |
| // GenericDomTreeConstruction.h. | |
| // | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| template class llvm::DomTreeNodeBase<BasicBlock>; | |
| template class llvm::DominatorTreeBase<BasicBlock, false>; // DomTreeBase | |
| template class llvm::DominatorTreeBase<BasicBlock, true>; // PostDomTreeBase | |
| template class llvm::cfg::Update<BasicBlock *>; | |
| template void llvm::DomTreeBuilder::Calculate<DomTreeBuilder::BBDomTree>( | |
| DomTreeBuilder::BBDomTree &DT); | |
| template void | |
| llvm::DomTreeBuilder::CalculateWithUpdates<DomTreeBuilder::BBDomTree>( | |
| DomTreeBuilder::BBDomTree &DT, BBUpdates U); | |
| template void llvm::DomTreeBuilder::Calculate<DomTreeBuilder::BBPostDomTree>( | |
| DomTreeBuilder::BBPostDomTree &DT); | |
| // No CalculateWithUpdates<PostDomTree> instantiation, unless a usecase arises. | |
| template void llvm::DomTreeBuilder::InsertEdge<DomTreeBuilder::BBDomTree>( | |
| DomTreeBuilder::BBDomTree &DT, BasicBlock *From, BasicBlock *To); | |
| template void llvm::DomTreeBuilder::InsertEdge<DomTreeBuilder::BBPostDomTree>( | |
| DomTreeBuilder::BBPostDomTree &DT, BasicBlock *From, BasicBlock *To); | |
| template void llvm::DomTreeBuilder::DeleteEdge<DomTreeBuilder::BBDomTree>( | |
| DomTreeBuilder::BBDomTree &DT, BasicBlock *From, BasicBlock *To); | |
| template void llvm::DomTreeBuilder::DeleteEdge<DomTreeBuilder::BBPostDomTree>( | |
| DomTreeBuilder::BBPostDomTree &DT, BasicBlock *From, BasicBlock *To); | |
| template void llvm::DomTreeBuilder::ApplyUpdates<DomTreeBuilder::BBDomTree>( | |
| DomTreeBuilder::BBDomTree &DT, DomTreeBuilder::BBDomTreeGraphDiff &, | |
| DomTreeBuilder::BBDomTreeGraphDiff *); | |
| template void llvm::DomTreeBuilder::ApplyUpdates<DomTreeBuilder::BBPostDomTree>( | |
| DomTreeBuilder::BBPostDomTree &DT, DomTreeBuilder::BBPostDomTreeGraphDiff &, | |
| DomTreeBuilder::BBPostDomTreeGraphDiff *); | |
| template bool llvm::DomTreeBuilder::Verify<DomTreeBuilder::BBDomTree>( | |
| const DomTreeBuilder::BBDomTree &DT, | |
| DomTreeBuilder::BBDomTree::VerificationLevel VL); | |
| template bool llvm::DomTreeBuilder::Verify<DomTreeBuilder::BBPostDomTree>( | |
| const DomTreeBuilder::BBPostDomTree &DT, | |
| DomTreeBuilder::BBPostDomTree::VerificationLevel VL); | |
| bool DominatorTree::invalidate(Function &F, const PreservedAnalyses &PA, | |
| FunctionAnalysisManager::Invalidator &) { | |
| // Check whether the analysis, all analyses on functions, or the function's | |
| // CFG have been preserved. | |
| auto PAC = PA.getChecker<DominatorTreeAnalysis>(); | |
| return !(PAC.preserved() || PAC.preservedSet<AllAnalysesOn<Function>>() || | |
| PAC.preservedSet<CFGAnalyses>()); | |
| } | |
| bool DominatorTree::dominates(const BasicBlock *BB, const Use &U) const { | |
| Instruction *UserInst = cast<Instruction>(U.getUser()); | |
| if (auto *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(UserInst)) | |
| // A phi use using a value from a block is dominated by the end of that | |
| // block. Note that the phi's parent block may not be. | |
| return dominates(BB, PN->getIncomingBlock(U)); | |
| else | |
| return properlyDominates(BB, UserInst->getParent()); | |
| } | |
| // dominates - Return true if Def dominates a use in User. This performs | |
| // the special checks necessary if Def and User are in the same basic block. | |
| // Note that Def doesn't dominate a use in Def itself! | |
| bool DominatorTree::dominates(const Value *DefV, | |
| const Instruction *User) const { | |
| const Instruction *Def = dyn_cast<Instruction>(DefV); | |
| if (!Def) { | |
| assert((isa<Argument>(DefV) || isa<Constant>(DefV)) && | |
| "Should be called with an instruction, argument or constant"); | |
| return true; // Arguments and constants dominate everything. | |
| } | |
| const BasicBlock *UseBB = User->getParent(); | |
| const BasicBlock *DefBB = Def->getParent(); | |
| // Any unreachable use is dominated, even if Def == User. | |
| if (!isReachableFromEntry(UseBB)) | |
| return true; | |
| // Unreachable definitions don't dominate anything. | |
| if (!isReachableFromEntry(DefBB)) | |
| return false; | |
| // An instruction doesn't dominate a use in itself. | |
| if (Def == User) | |
| return false; | |
| // The value defined by an invoke dominates an instruction only if it | |
| // dominates every instruction in UseBB. | |
| // A PHI is dominated only if the instruction dominates every possible use in | |
| // the UseBB. | |
| if (isa<InvokeInst>(Def) || isa<CallBrInst>(Def) || isa<PHINode>(User)) | |
| return dominates(Def, UseBB); | |
| if (DefBB != UseBB) | |
| return dominates(DefBB, UseBB); | |
| return Def->comesBefore(User); | |
| } | |
| // true if Def would dominate a use in any instruction in UseBB. | |
| // note that dominates(Def, Def->getParent()) is false. | |
| bool DominatorTree::dominates(const Instruction *Def, | |
| const BasicBlock *UseBB) const { | |
| const BasicBlock *DefBB = Def->getParent(); | |
| // Any unreachable use is dominated, even if DefBB == UseBB. | |
| if (!isReachableFromEntry(UseBB)) | |
| return true; | |
| // Unreachable definitions don't dominate anything. | |
| if (!isReachableFromEntry(DefBB)) | |
| return false; | |
| if (DefBB == UseBB) | |
| return false; | |
| // Invoke results are only usable in the normal destination, not in the | |
| // exceptional destination. | |
| if (const auto *II = dyn_cast<InvokeInst>(Def)) { | |
| BasicBlock *NormalDest = II->getNormalDest(); | |
| BasicBlockEdge E(DefBB, NormalDest); | |
| return dominates(E, UseBB); | |
| } | |
| // Callbr results are similarly only usable in the default destination. | |
| if (const auto *CBI = dyn_cast<CallBrInst>(Def)) { | |
| BasicBlock *NormalDest = CBI->getDefaultDest(); | |
| BasicBlockEdge E(DefBB, NormalDest); | |
| return dominates(E, UseBB); | |
| } | |
| return dominates(DefBB, UseBB); | |
| } | |
| bool DominatorTree::dominates(const BasicBlockEdge &BBE, | |
| const BasicBlock *UseBB) const { | |
| // If the BB the edge ends in doesn't dominate the use BB, then the | |
| // edge also doesn't. | |
| const BasicBlock *Start = BBE.getStart(); | |
| const BasicBlock *End = BBE.getEnd(); | |
| if (!dominates(End, UseBB)) | |
| return false; | |
| // Simple case: if the end BB has a single predecessor, the fact that it | |
| // dominates the use block implies that the edge also does. | |
| if (End->getSinglePredecessor()) | |
| return true; | |
| // The normal edge from the invoke is critical. Conceptually, what we would | |
| // like to do is split it and check if the new block dominates the use. | |
| // With X being the new block, the graph would look like: | |
| // | |
| // DefBB | |
| // /\ . . | |
| // / \ . . | |
| // / \ . . | |
| // / \ | | | |
| // A X B C | |
| // | \ | / | |
| // . \|/ | |
| // . NormalDest | |
| // . | |
| // | |
| // Given the definition of dominance, NormalDest is dominated by X iff X | |
| // dominates all of NormalDest's predecessors (X, B, C in the example). X | |
| // trivially dominates itself, so we only have to find if it dominates the | |
| // other predecessors. Since the only way out of X is via NormalDest, X can | |
| // only properly dominate a node if NormalDest dominates that node too. | |
| int IsDuplicateEdge = 0; | |
| for (const BasicBlock *BB : predecessors(End)) { | |
| if (BB == Start) { | |
| // If there are multiple edges between Start and End, by definition they | |
| // can't dominate anything. | |
| if (IsDuplicateEdge++) | |
| return false; | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| if (!dominates(End, BB)) | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| bool DominatorTree::dominates(const BasicBlockEdge &BBE, const Use &U) const { | |
| Instruction *UserInst = cast<Instruction>(U.getUser()); | |
| // A PHI in the end of the edge is dominated by it. | |
| PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(UserInst); | |
| if (PN && PN->getParent() == BBE.getEnd() && | |
| PN->getIncomingBlock(U) == BBE.getStart()) | |
| return true; | |
| // Otherwise use the edge-dominates-block query, which | |
| // handles the crazy critical edge cases properly. | |
| const BasicBlock *UseBB; | |
| if (PN) | |
| UseBB = PN->getIncomingBlock(U); | |
| else | |
| UseBB = UserInst->getParent(); | |
| return dominates(BBE, UseBB); | |
| } | |
| bool DominatorTree::dominates(const Value *DefV, const Use &U) const { | |
| const Instruction *Def = dyn_cast<Instruction>(DefV); | |
| if (!Def) { | |
| assert((isa<Argument>(DefV) || isa<Constant>(DefV)) && | |
| "Should be called with an instruction, argument or constant"); | |
| return true; // Arguments and constants dominate everything. | |
| } | |
| Instruction *UserInst = cast<Instruction>(U.getUser()); | |
| const BasicBlock *DefBB = Def->getParent(); | |
| // Determine the block in which the use happens. PHI nodes use | |
| // their operands on edges; simulate this by thinking of the use | |
| // happening at the end of the predecessor block. | |
| const BasicBlock *UseBB; | |
| if (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(UserInst)) | |
| UseBB = PN->getIncomingBlock(U); | |
| else | |
| UseBB = UserInst->getParent(); | |
| // Any unreachable use is dominated, even if Def == User. | |
| if (!isReachableFromEntry(UseBB)) | |
| return true; | |
| // Unreachable definitions don't dominate anything. | |
| if (!isReachableFromEntry(DefBB)) | |
| return false; | |
| // Invoke instructions define their return values on the edges to their normal | |
| // successors, so we have to handle them specially. | |
| // Among other things, this means they don't dominate anything in | |
| // their own block, except possibly a phi, so we don't need to | |
| // walk the block in any case. | |
| if (const InvokeInst *II = dyn_cast<InvokeInst>(Def)) { | |
| BasicBlock *NormalDest = II->getNormalDest(); | |
| BasicBlockEdge E(DefBB, NormalDest); | |
| return dominates(E, U); | |
| } | |
| // Callbr results are similarly only usable in the default destination. | |
| if (const auto *CBI = dyn_cast<CallBrInst>(Def)) { | |
| BasicBlock *NormalDest = CBI->getDefaultDest(); | |
| BasicBlockEdge E(DefBB, NormalDest); | |
| return dominates(E, U); | |
| } | |
| // If the def and use are in different blocks, do a simple CFG dominator | |
| // tree query. | |
| if (DefBB != UseBB) | |
| return dominates(DefBB, UseBB); | |
| // Ok, def and use are in the same block. If the def is an invoke, it | |
| // doesn't dominate anything in the block. If it's a PHI, it dominates | |
| // everything in the block. | |
| if (isa<PHINode>(UserInst)) | |
| return true; | |
| return Def->comesBefore(UserInst); | |
| } | |
| bool DominatorTree::isReachableFromEntry(const Use &U) const { | |
| Instruction *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(U.getUser()); | |
| // ConstantExprs aren't really reachable from the entry block, but they | |
| // don't need to be treated like unreachable code either. | |
| if (!I) return true; | |
| // PHI nodes use their operands on their incoming edges. | |
| if (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(I)) | |
| return isReachableFromEntry(PN->getIncomingBlock(U)); | |
| // Everything else uses their operands in their own block. | |
| return isReachableFromEntry(I->getParent()); | |
| } | |
| // Edge BBE1 dominates edge BBE2 if they match or BBE1 dominates start of BBE2. | |
| bool DominatorTree::dominates(const BasicBlockEdge &BBE1, | |
| const BasicBlockEdge &BBE2) const { | |
| if (BBE1.getStart() == BBE2.getStart() && BBE1.getEnd() == BBE2.getEnd()) | |
| return true; | |
| return dominates(BBE1, BBE2.getStart()); | |
| } | |
| Instruction *DominatorTree::findNearestCommonDominator(Instruction *I1, | |
| Instruction *I2) const { | |
| BasicBlock *BB1 = I1->getParent(); | |
| BasicBlock *BB2 = I2->getParent(); | |
| if (BB1 == BB2) | |
| return I1->comesBefore(I2) ? I1 : I2; | |
| if (!isReachableFromEntry(BB2)) | |
| return I1; | |
| if (!isReachableFromEntry(BB1)) | |
| return I2; | |
| BasicBlock *DomBB = findNearestCommonDominator(BB1, BB2); | |
| if (BB1 == DomBB) | |
| return I1; | |
| if (BB2 == DomBB) | |
| return I2; | |
| return DomBB->getTerminator(); | |
| } | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| // DominatorTreeAnalysis and related pass implementations | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| // | |
| // This implements the DominatorTreeAnalysis which is used with the new pass | |
| // manager. It also implements some methods from utility passes. | |
| // | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| DominatorTree DominatorTreeAnalysis::run(Function &F, | |
| FunctionAnalysisManager &) { | |
| DominatorTree DT; | |
| DT.recalculate(F); | |
| return DT; | |
| } | |
| AnalysisKey DominatorTreeAnalysis::Key; | |
| DominatorTreePrinterPass::DominatorTreePrinterPass(raw_ostream &OS) : OS(OS) {} | |
| PreservedAnalyses DominatorTreePrinterPass::run(Function &F, | |
| FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) { | |
| OS << "DominatorTree for function: " << F.getName() << "\n"; | |
| AM.getResult<DominatorTreeAnalysis>(F).print(OS); | |
| return PreservedAnalyses::all(); | |
| } | |
| PreservedAnalyses DominatorTreeVerifierPass::run(Function &F, | |
| FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) { | |
| auto &DT = AM.getResult<DominatorTreeAnalysis>(F); | |
| assert(DT.verify()); | |
| (void)DT; | |
| return PreservedAnalyses::all(); | |
| } | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| // DominatorTreeWrapperPass Implementation | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| // | |
| // The implementation details of the wrapper pass that holds a DominatorTree | |
| // suitable for use with the legacy pass manager. | |
| // | |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
| char DominatorTreeWrapperPass::ID = 0; | |
| DominatorTreeWrapperPass::DominatorTreeWrapperPass() : FunctionPass(ID) { | |
| initializeDominatorTreeWrapperPassPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry()); | |
| } | |
| INITIALIZE_PASS(DominatorTreeWrapperPass, "domtree", | |
| "Dominator Tree Construction", true, true) | |
| bool DominatorTreeWrapperPass::runOnFunction(Function &F) { | |
| DT.recalculate(F); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| void DominatorTreeWrapperPass::verifyAnalysis() const { | |
| if (VerifyDomInfo) | |
| assert(DT.verify(DominatorTree::VerificationLevel::Full)); | |
| else if (ExpensiveChecksEnabled) | |
| assert(DT.verify(DominatorTree::VerificationLevel::Basic)); | |
| } | |
| void DominatorTreeWrapperPass::print(raw_ostream &OS, const Module *) const { | |
| DT.print(OS); | |
| } |