| //===- GuardWidening.cpp - ---- Guard widening ----------------------------===// |
| // |
| // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. |
| // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. |
| // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception |
| // |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
| // |
| // This file implements the guard widening pass. The semantics of the |
| // @llvm.experimental.guard intrinsic lets LLVM transform it so that it fails |
| // more often that it did before the transform. This optimization is called |
| // "widening" and can be used hoist and common runtime checks in situations like |
| // these: |
| // |
| // %cmp0 = 7 u< Length |
| // call @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp0) [ "deopt"(...) ] |
| // call @unknown_side_effects() |
| // %cmp1 = 9 u< Length |
| // call @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp1) [ "deopt"(...) ] |
| // ... |
| // |
| // => |
| // |
| // %cmp0 = 9 u< Length |
| // call @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp0) [ "deopt"(...) ] |
| // call @unknown_side_effects() |
| // ... |
| // |
| // If %cmp0 is false, @llvm.experimental.guard will "deoptimize" back to a |
| // generic implementation of the same function, which will have the correct |
| // semantics from that point onward. It is always _legal_ to deoptimize (so |
| // replacing %cmp0 with false is "correct"), though it may not always be |
| // profitable to do so. |
| // |
| // NB! This pass is a work in progress. It hasn't been tuned to be "production |
| // ready" yet. It is known to have quadriatic running time and will not scale |
| // to large numbers of guards |
| // |
| //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
| |
| #include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar/GuardWidening.h" |
| #include "llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h" |
| #include "llvm/ADT/DepthFirstIterator.h" |
| #include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h" |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/BranchProbabilityInfo.h" |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/GuardUtils.h" |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h" |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/LoopPass.h" |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/PostDominators.h" |
| #include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h" |
| #include "llvm/IR/ConstantRange.h" |
| #include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h" |
| #include "llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h" |
| #include "llvm/IR/PatternMatch.h" |
| #include "llvm/InitializePasses.h" |
| #include "llvm/Pass.h" |
| #include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h" |
| #include "llvm/Support/Debug.h" |
| #include "llvm/Support/KnownBits.h" |
| #include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h" |
| #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/GuardUtils.h" |
| #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.h" |
| #include <functional> |
| |
| using namespace llvm; |
| |
| #define DEBUG_TYPE "guard-widening" |
| |
| STATISTIC(GuardsEliminated, "Number of eliminated guards"); |
| STATISTIC(CondBranchEliminated, "Number of eliminated conditional branches"); |
| |
| static cl::opt<bool> |
| WidenBranchGuards("guard-widening-widen-branch-guards", cl::Hidden, |
| cl::desc("Whether or not we should widen guards " |
| "expressed as branches by widenable conditions"), |
| cl::init(true)); |
| |
| namespace { |
| |
| // Get the condition of \p I. It can either be a guard or a conditional branch. |
| static Value *getCondition(Instruction *I) { |
| if (IntrinsicInst *GI = dyn_cast<IntrinsicInst>(I)) { |
| assert(GI->getIntrinsicID() == Intrinsic::experimental_guard && |
| "Bad guard intrinsic?"); |
| return GI->getArgOperand(0); |
| } |
| Value *Cond, *WC; |
| BasicBlock *IfTrueBB, *IfFalseBB; |
| if (parseWidenableBranch(I, Cond, WC, IfTrueBB, IfFalseBB)) |
| return Cond; |
| |
| return cast<BranchInst>(I)->getCondition(); |
| } |
| |
| // Set the condition for \p I to \p NewCond. \p I can either be a guard or a |
| // conditional branch. |
| static void setCondition(Instruction *I, Value *NewCond) { |
| if (IntrinsicInst *GI = dyn_cast<IntrinsicInst>(I)) { |
| assert(GI->getIntrinsicID() == Intrinsic::experimental_guard && |
| "Bad guard intrinsic?"); |
| GI->setArgOperand(0, NewCond); |
| return; |
| } |
| cast<BranchInst>(I)->setCondition(NewCond); |
| } |
| |
| // Eliminates the guard instruction properly. |
| static void eliminateGuard(Instruction *GuardInst) { |
| GuardInst->eraseFromParent(); |
| ++GuardsEliminated; |
| } |
| |
| class GuardWideningImpl { |
| DominatorTree &DT; |
| PostDominatorTree *PDT; |
| LoopInfo &LI; |
| |
| /// Together, these describe the region of interest. This might be all of |
| /// the blocks within a function, or only a given loop's blocks and preheader. |
| DomTreeNode *Root; |
| std::function<bool(BasicBlock*)> BlockFilter; |
| |
| /// The set of guards and conditional branches whose conditions have been |
| /// widened into dominating guards. |
| SmallVector<Instruction *, 16> EliminatedGuardsAndBranches; |
| |
| /// The set of guards which have been widened to include conditions to other |
| /// guards. |
| DenseSet<Instruction *> WidenedGuards; |
| |
| /// Try to eliminate instruction \p Instr by widening it into an earlier |
| /// dominating guard. \p DFSI is the DFS iterator on the dominator tree that |
| /// is currently visiting the block containing \p Guard, and \p GuardsPerBlock |
| /// maps BasicBlocks to the set of guards seen in that block. |
| bool eliminateInstrViaWidening( |
| Instruction *Instr, const df_iterator<DomTreeNode *> &DFSI, |
| const DenseMap<BasicBlock *, SmallVector<Instruction *, 8>> & |
| GuardsPerBlock, bool InvertCondition = false); |
| |
| /// Used to keep track of which widening potential is more effective. |
| enum WideningScore { |
| /// Don't widen. |
| WS_IllegalOrNegative, |
| |
| /// Widening is performance neutral as far as the cycles spent in check |
| /// conditions goes (but can still help, e.g., code layout, having less |
| /// deopt state). |
| WS_Neutral, |
| |
| /// Widening is profitable. |
| WS_Positive, |
| |
| /// Widening is very profitable. Not significantly different from \c |
| /// WS_Positive, except by the order. |
| WS_VeryPositive |
| }; |
| |
| static StringRef scoreTypeToString(WideningScore WS); |
| |
| /// Compute the score for widening the condition in \p DominatedInstr |
| /// into \p DominatingGuard. If \p InvertCond is set, then we widen the |
| /// inverted condition of the dominating guard. |
| WideningScore computeWideningScore(Instruction *DominatedInstr, |
| Instruction *DominatingGuard, |
| bool InvertCond); |
| |
| /// Helper to check if \p V can be hoisted to \p InsertPos. |
| bool isAvailableAt(const Value *V, const Instruction *InsertPos) const { |
| SmallPtrSet<const Instruction *, 8> Visited; |
| return isAvailableAt(V, InsertPos, Visited); |
| } |
| |
| bool isAvailableAt(const Value *V, const Instruction *InsertPos, |
| SmallPtrSetImpl<const Instruction *> &Visited) const; |
| |
| /// Helper to hoist \p V to \p InsertPos. Guaranteed to succeed if \c |
| /// isAvailableAt returned true. |
| void makeAvailableAt(Value *V, Instruction *InsertPos) const; |
| |
| /// Common helper used by \c widenGuard and \c isWideningCondProfitable. Try |
| /// to generate an expression computing the logical AND of \p Cond0 and (\p |
| /// Cond1 XOR \p InvertCondition). |
| /// Return true if the expression computing the AND is only as |
| /// expensive as computing one of the two. If \p InsertPt is true then |
| /// actually generate the resulting expression, make it available at \p |
| /// InsertPt and return it in \p Result (else no change to the IR is made). |
| bool widenCondCommon(Value *Cond0, Value *Cond1, Instruction *InsertPt, |
| Value *&Result, bool InvertCondition); |
| |
| /// Represents a range check of the form \c Base + \c Offset u< \c Length, |
| /// with the constraint that \c Length is not negative. \c CheckInst is the |
| /// pre-existing instruction in the IR that computes the result of this range |
| /// check. |
| class RangeCheck { |
| const Value *Base; |
| const ConstantInt *Offset; |
| const Value *Length; |
| ICmpInst *CheckInst; |
| |
| public: |
| explicit RangeCheck(const Value *Base, const ConstantInt *Offset, |
| const Value *Length, ICmpInst *CheckInst) |
| : Base(Base), Offset(Offset), Length(Length), CheckInst(CheckInst) {} |
| |
| void setBase(const Value *NewBase) { Base = NewBase; } |
| void setOffset(const ConstantInt *NewOffset) { Offset = NewOffset; } |
| |
| const Value *getBase() const { return Base; } |
| const ConstantInt *getOffset() const { return Offset; } |
| const APInt &getOffsetValue() const { return getOffset()->getValue(); } |
| const Value *getLength() const { return Length; }; |
| ICmpInst *getCheckInst() const { return CheckInst; } |
| |
| void print(raw_ostream &OS, bool PrintTypes = false) { |
| OS << "Base: "; |
| Base->printAsOperand(OS, PrintTypes); |
| OS << " Offset: "; |
| Offset->printAsOperand(OS, PrintTypes); |
| OS << " Length: "; |
| Length->printAsOperand(OS, PrintTypes); |
| } |
| |
| LLVM_DUMP_METHOD void dump() { |
| print(dbgs()); |
| dbgs() << "\n"; |
| } |
| }; |
| |
| /// Parse \p CheckCond into a conjunction (logical-and) of range checks; and |
| /// append them to \p Checks. Returns true on success, may clobber \c Checks |
| /// on failure. |
| bool parseRangeChecks(Value *CheckCond, SmallVectorImpl<RangeCheck> &Checks) { |
| SmallPtrSet<const Value *, 8> Visited; |
| return parseRangeChecks(CheckCond, Checks, Visited); |
| } |
| |
| bool parseRangeChecks(Value *CheckCond, SmallVectorImpl<RangeCheck> &Checks, |
| SmallPtrSetImpl<const Value *> &Visited); |
| |
| /// Combine the checks in \p Checks into a smaller set of checks and append |
| /// them into \p CombinedChecks. Return true on success (i.e. all of checks |
| /// in \p Checks were combined into \p CombinedChecks). Clobbers \p Checks |
| /// and \p CombinedChecks on success and on failure. |
| bool combineRangeChecks(SmallVectorImpl<RangeCheck> &Checks, |
| SmallVectorImpl<RangeCheck> &CombinedChecks) const; |
| |
| /// Can we compute the logical AND of \p Cond0 and \p Cond1 for the price of |
| /// computing only one of the two expressions? |
| bool isWideningCondProfitable(Value *Cond0, Value *Cond1, bool InvertCond) { |
| Value *ResultUnused; |
| return widenCondCommon(Cond0, Cond1, /*InsertPt=*/nullptr, ResultUnused, |
| InvertCond); |
| } |
| |
| /// If \p InvertCondition is false, Widen \p ToWiden to fail if |
| /// \p NewCondition is false, otherwise make it fail if \p NewCondition is |
| /// true (in addition to whatever it is already checking). |
| void widenGuard(Instruction *ToWiden, Value *NewCondition, |
| bool InvertCondition) { |
| Value *Result; |
| |
| widenCondCommon(getCondition(ToWiden), NewCondition, ToWiden, Result, |
| InvertCondition); |
| if (isGuardAsWidenableBranch(ToWiden)) { |
| setWidenableBranchCond(cast<BranchInst>(ToWiden), Result); |
| return; |
| } |
| setCondition(ToWiden, Result); |
| } |
| |
| public: |
| |
| explicit GuardWideningImpl(DominatorTree &DT, PostDominatorTree *PDT, |
| LoopInfo &LI, DomTreeNode *Root, |
| std::function<bool(BasicBlock*)> BlockFilter) |
| : DT(DT), PDT(PDT), LI(LI), Root(Root), BlockFilter(BlockFilter) |
| {} |
| |
| /// The entry point for this pass. |
| bool run(); |
| }; |
| } |
| |
| static bool isSupportedGuardInstruction(const Instruction *Insn) { |
| if (isGuard(Insn)) |
| return true; |
| if (WidenBranchGuards && isGuardAsWidenableBranch(Insn)) |
| return true; |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| bool GuardWideningImpl::run() { |
| DenseMap<BasicBlock *, SmallVector<Instruction *, 8>> GuardsInBlock; |
| bool Changed = false; |
| for (auto DFI = df_begin(Root), DFE = df_end(Root); |
| DFI != DFE; ++DFI) { |
| auto *BB = (*DFI)->getBlock(); |
| if (!BlockFilter(BB)) |
| continue; |
| |
| auto &CurrentList = GuardsInBlock[BB]; |
| |
| for (auto &I : *BB) |
| if (isSupportedGuardInstruction(&I)) |
| CurrentList.push_back(cast<Instruction>(&I)); |
| |
| for (auto *II : CurrentList) |
| Changed |= eliminateInstrViaWidening(II, DFI, GuardsInBlock); |
| } |
| |
| assert(EliminatedGuardsAndBranches.empty() || Changed); |
| for (auto *I : EliminatedGuardsAndBranches) |
| if (!WidenedGuards.count(I)) { |
| assert(isa<ConstantInt>(getCondition(I)) && "Should be!"); |
| if (isSupportedGuardInstruction(I)) |
| eliminateGuard(I); |
| else { |
| assert(isa<BranchInst>(I) && |
| "Eliminated something other than guard or branch?"); |
| ++CondBranchEliminated; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| return Changed; |
| } |
| |
| bool GuardWideningImpl::eliminateInstrViaWidening( |
| Instruction *Instr, const df_iterator<DomTreeNode *> &DFSI, |
| const DenseMap<BasicBlock *, SmallVector<Instruction *, 8>> & |
| GuardsInBlock, bool InvertCondition) { |
| // Ignore trivial true or false conditions. These instructions will be |
| // trivially eliminated by any cleanup pass. Do not erase them because other |
| // guards can possibly be widened into them. |
| if (isa<ConstantInt>(getCondition(Instr))) |
| return false; |
| |
| Instruction *BestSoFar = nullptr; |
| auto BestScoreSoFar = WS_IllegalOrNegative; |
| |
| // In the set of dominating guards, find the one we can merge GuardInst with |
| // for the most profit. |
| for (unsigned i = 0, e = DFSI.getPathLength(); i != e; ++i) { |
| auto *CurBB = DFSI.getPath(i)->getBlock(); |
| if (!BlockFilter(CurBB)) |
| break; |
| assert(GuardsInBlock.count(CurBB) && "Must have been populated by now!"); |
| const auto &GuardsInCurBB = GuardsInBlock.find(CurBB)->second; |
| |
| auto I = GuardsInCurBB.begin(); |
| auto E = Instr->getParent() == CurBB |
| ? std::find(GuardsInCurBB.begin(), GuardsInCurBB.end(), Instr) |
| : GuardsInCurBB.end(); |
| |
| #ifndef NDEBUG |
| { |
| unsigned Index = 0; |
| for (auto &I : *CurBB) { |
| if (Index == GuardsInCurBB.size()) |
| break; |
| if (GuardsInCurBB[Index] == &I) |
| Index++; |
| } |
| assert(Index == GuardsInCurBB.size() && |
| "Guards expected to be in order!"); |
| } |
| #endif |
| |
| assert((i == (e - 1)) == (Instr->getParent() == CurBB) && "Bad DFS?"); |
| |
| for (auto *Candidate : make_range(I, E)) { |
| auto Score = computeWideningScore(Instr, Candidate, InvertCondition); |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Score between " << *getCondition(Instr) |
| << " and " << *getCondition(Candidate) << " is " |
| << scoreTypeToString(Score) << "\n"); |
| if (Score > BestScoreSoFar) { |
| BestScoreSoFar = Score; |
| BestSoFar = Candidate; |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| if (BestScoreSoFar == WS_IllegalOrNegative) { |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Did not eliminate guard " << *Instr << "\n"); |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| assert(BestSoFar != Instr && "Should have never visited same guard!"); |
| assert(DT.dominates(BestSoFar, Instr) && "Should be!"); |
| |
| LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Widening " << *Instr << " into " << *BestSoFar |
| << " with score " << scoreTypeToString(BestScoreSoFar) |
| << "\n"); |
| widenGuard(BestSoFar, getCondition(Instr), InvertCondition); |
| auto NewGuardCondition = InvertCondition |
| ? ConstantInt::getFalse(Instr->getContext()) |
| : ConstantInt::getTrue(Instr->getContext()); |
| setCondition(Instr, NewGuardCondition); |
| EliminatedGuardsAndBranches.push_back(Instr); |
| WidenedGuards.insert(BestSoFar); |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| GuardWideningImpl::WideningScore |
| GuardWideningImpl::computeWideningScore(Instruction *DominatedInstr, |
| Instruction *DominatingGuard, |
| bool InvertCond) { |
| Loop *DominatedInstrLoop = LI.getLoopFor(DominatedInstr->getParent()); |
| Loop *DominatingGuardLoop = LI.getLoopFor(DominatingGuard->getParent()); |
| bool HoistingOutOfLoop = false; |
| |
| if (DominatingGuardLoop != DominatedInstrLoop) { |
| // Be conservative and don't widen into a sibling loop. TODO: If the |
| // sibling is colder, we should consider allowing this. |
| if (DominatingGuardLoop && |
| !DominatingGuardLoop->contains(DominatedInstrLoop)) |
| return WS_IllegalOrNegative; |
| |
| HoistingOutOfLoop = true; |
| } |
| |
| if (!isAvailableAt(getCondition(DominatedInstr), DominatingGuard)) |
| return WS_IllegalOrNegative; |
| |
| // If the guard was conditional executed, it may never be reached |
| // dynamically. There are two potential downsides to hoisting it out of the |
| // conditionally executed region: 1) we may spuriously deopt without need and |
| // 2) we have the extra cost of computing the guard condition in the common |
| // case. At the moment, we really only consider the second in our heuristic |
| // here. TODO: evaluate cost model for spurious deopt |
| // NOTE: As written, this also lets us hoist right over another guard which |
| // is essentially just another spelling for control flow. |
| if (isWideningCondProfitable(getCondition(DominatedInstr), |
| getCondition(DominatingGuard), InvertCond)) |
| return HoistingOutOfLoop ? WS_VeryPositive : WS_Positive; |
| |
| if (HoistingOutOfLoop) |
| return WS_Positive; |
| |
| // Returns true if we might be hoisting above explicit control flow. Note |
| // that this completely ignores implicit control flow (guards, calls which |
| // throw, etc...). That choice appears arbitrary. |
| auto MaybeHoistingOutOfIf = [&]() { |
| auto *DominatingBlock = DominatingGuard->getParent(); |
| auto *DominatedBlock = DominatedInstr->getParent(); |
| if (isGuardAsWidenableBranch(DominatingGuard)) |
| DominatingBlock = cast<BranchInst>(DominatingGuard)->getSuccessor(0); |
| |
| // Same Block? |
| if (DominatedBlock == DominatingBlock) |
| return false; |
| // Obvious successor (common loop header/preheader case) |
| if (DominatedBlock == DominatingBlock->getUniqueSuccessor()) |
| return false; |
| // TODO: diamond, triangle cases |
| if (!PDT) return true; |
| return !PDT->dominates(DominatedBlock, DominatingBlock); |
| }; |
| |
| return MaybeHoistingOutOfIf() ? WS_IllegalOrNegative : WS_Neutral; |
| } |
| |
| bool GuardWideningImpl::isAvailableAt( |
| const Value *V, const Instruction *Loc, |
| SmallPtrSetImpl<const Instruction *> &Visited) const { |
| auto *Inst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V); |
| if (!Inst || DT.dominates(Inst, Loc) || Visited.count(Inst)) |
| return true; |
| |
| if (!isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute(Inst, Loc, &DT) || |
| Inst->mayReadFromMemory()) |
| return false; |
| |
| Visited.insert(Inst); |
| |
| // We only want to go _up_ the dominance chain when recursing. |
| assert(!isa<PHINode>(Loc) && |
| "PHIs should return false for isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute"); |
| assert(DT.isReachableFromEntry(Inst->getParent()) && |
| "We did a DFS from the block entry!"); |
| return all_of(Inst->operands(), |
| [&](Value *Op) { return isAvailableAt(Op, Loc, Visited); }); |
| } |
| |
| void GuardWideningImpl::makeAvailableAt(Value *V, Instruction *Loc) const { |
| auto *Inst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V); |
| if (!Inst || DT.dominates(Inst, Loc)) |
| return; |
| |
| assert(isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute(Inst, Loc, &DT) && |
| !Inst->mayReadFromMemory() && "Should've checked with isAvailableAt!"); |
| |
| for (Value *Op : Inst->operands()) |
| makeAvailableAt(Op, Loc); |
| |
| Inst->moveBefore(Loc); |
| } |
| |
| bool GuardWideningImpl::widenCondCommon(Value *Cond0, Value *Cond1, |
| Instruction *InsertPt, Value *&Result, |
| bool InvertCondition) { |
| using namespace llvm::PatternMatch; |
| |
| { |
| // L >u C0 && L >u C1 -> L >u max(C0, C1) |
| ConstantInt *RHS0, *RHS1; |
| Value *LHS; |
| ICmpInst::Predicate Pred0, Pred1; |
| if (match(Cond0, m_ICmp(Pred0, m_Value(LHS), m_ConstantInt(RHS0))) && |
| match(Cond1, m_ICmp(Pred1, m_Specific(LHS), m_ConstantInt(RHS1)))) { |
| if (InvertCondition) |
| Pred1 = ICmpInst::getInversePredicate(Pred1); |
| |
| ConstantRange CR0 = |
| ConstantRange::makeExactICmpRegion(Pred0, RHS0->getValue()); |
| ConstantRange CR1 = |
| ConstantRange::makeExactICmpRegion(Pred1, RHS1->getValue()); |
| |
| // SubsetIntersect is a subset of the actual mathematical intersection of |
| // CR0 and CR1, while SupersetIntersect is a superset of the actual |
| // mathematical intersection. If these two ConstantRanges are equal, then |
| // we know we were able to represent the actual mathematical intersection |
| // of CR0 and CR1, and can use the same to generate an icmp instruction. |
| // |
| // Given what we're doing here and the semantics of guards, it would |
| // actually be correct to just use SubsetIntersect, but that may be too |
| // aggressive in cases we care about. |
| auto SubsetIntersect = CR0.inverse().unionWith(CR1.inverse()).inverse(); |
| auto SupersetIntersect = CR0.intersectWith(CR1); |
| |
| APInt NewRHSAP; |
| CmpInst::Predicate Pred; |
| if (SubsetIntersect == SupersetIntersect && |
| SubsetIntersect.getEquivalentICmp(Pred, NewRHSAP)) { |
| if (InsertPt) { |
| ConstantInt *NewRHS = ConstantInt::get(Cond0->getContext(), NewRHSAP); |
| Result = new ICmpInst(InsertPt, Pred, LHS, NewRHS, "wide.chk"); |
| } |
| return true; |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| { |
| SmallVector<GuardWideningImpl::RangeCheck, 4> Checks, CombinedChecks; |
| // TODO: Support InvertCondition case? |
| if (!InvertCondition && |
| parseRangeChecks(Cond0, Checks) && parseRangeChecks(Cond1, Checks) && |
| combineRangeChecks(Checks, CombinedChecks)) { |
| if (InsertPt) { |
| Result = nullptr; |
| for (auto &RC : CombinedChecks) { |
| makeAvailableAt(RC.getCheckInst(), InsertPt); |
| if (Result) |
| Result = BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(RC.getCheckInst(), Result, "", |
| InsertPt); |
| else |
| Result = RC.getCheckInst(); |
| } |
| assert(Result && "Failed to find result value"); |
| Result->setName("wide.chk"); |
| } |
| return true; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // Base case -- just logical-and the two conditions together. |
| |
| if (InsertPt) { |
| makeAvailableAt(Cond0, InsertPt); |
| makeAvailableAt(Cond1, InsertPt); |
| if (InvertCondition) |
| Cond1 = BinaryOperator::CreateNot(Cond1, "inverted", InsertPt); |
| Result = BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(Cond0, Cond1, "wide.chk", InsertPt); |
| } |
| |
| // We were not able to compute Cond0 AND Cond1 for the price of one. |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| bool GuardWideningImpl::parseRangeChecks( |
| Value *CheckCond, SmallVectorImpl<GuardWideningImpl::RangeCheck> &Checks, |
| SmallPtrSetImpl<const Value *> &Visited) { |
| if (!Visited.insert(CheckCond).second) |
| return true; |
| |
| using namespace llvm::PatternMatch; |
| |
| { |
| Value *AndLHS, *AndRHS; |
| if (match(CheckCond, m_And(m_Value(AndLHS), m_Value(AndRHS)))) |
| return parseRangeChecks(AndLHS, Checks) && |
| parseRangeChecks(AndRHS, Checks); |
| } |
| |
| auto *IC = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(CheckCond); |
| if (!IC || !IC->getOperand(0)->getType()->isIntegerTy() || |
| (IC->getPredicate() != ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT && |
| IC->getPredicate() != ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT)) |
| return false; |
| |
| const Value *CmpLHS = IC->getOperand(0), *CmpRHS = IC->getOperand(1); |
| if (IC->getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT) |
| std::swap(CmpLHS, CmpRHS); |
| |
| auto &DL = IC->getModule()->getDataLayout(); |
| |
| GuardWideningImpl::RangeCheck Check( |
| CmpLHS, cast<ConstantInt>(ConstantInt::getNullValue(CmpRHS->getType())), |
| CmpRHS, IC); |
| |
| if (!isKnownNonNegative(Check.getLength(), DL)) |
| return false; |
| |
| // What we have in \c Check now is a correct interpretation of \p CheckCond. |
| // Try to see if we can move some constant offsets into the \c Offset field. |
| |
| bool Changed; |
| auto &Ctx = CheckCond->getContext(); |
| |
| do { |
| Value *OpLHS; |
| ConstantInt *OpRHS; |
| Changed = false; |
| |
| #ifndef NDEBUG |
| auto *BaseInst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Check.getBase()); |
| assert((!BaseInst || DT.isReachableFromEntry(BaseInst->getParent())) && |
| "Unreachable instruction?"); |
| #endif |
| |
| if (match(Check.getBase(), m_Add(m_Value(OpLHS), m_ConstantInt(OpRHS)))) { |
| Check.setBase(OpLHS); |
| APInt NewOffset = Check.getOffsetValue() + OpRHS->getValue(); |
| Check.setOffset(ConstantInt::get(Ctx, NewOffset)); |
| Changed = true; |
| } else if (match(Check.getBase(), |
| m_Or(m_Value(OpLHS), m_ConstantInt(OpRHS)))) { |
| KnownBits Known = computeKnownBits(OpLHS, DL); |
| if ((OpRHS->getValue() & Known.Zero) == OpRHS->getValue()) { |
| Check.setBase(OpLHS); |
| APInt NewOffset = Check.getOffsetValue() + OpRHS->getValue(); |
| Check.setOffset(ConstantInt::get(Ctx, NewOffset)); |
| Changed = true; |
| } |
| } |
| } while (Changed); |
| |
| Checks.push_back(Check); |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| bool GuardWideningImpl::combineRangeChecks( |
| SmallVectorImpl<GuardWideningImpl::RangeCheck> &Checks, |
| SmallVectorImpl<GuardWideningImpl::RangeCheck> &RangeChecksOut) const { |
| unsigned OldCount = Checks.size(); |
| while (!Checks.empty()) { |
| // Pick all of the range checks with a specific base and length, and try to |
| // merge them. |
| const Value *CurrentBase = Checks.front().getBase(); |
| const Value *CurrentLength = Checks.front().getLength(); |
| |
| SmallVector<GuardWideningImpl::RangeCheck, 3> CurrentChecks; |
| |
| auto IsCurrentCheck = [&](GuardWideningImpl::RangeCheck &RC) { |
| return RC.getBase() == CurrentBase && RC.getLength() == CurrentLength; |
| }; |
| |
| copy_if(Checks, std::back_inserter(CurrentChecks), IsCurrentCheck); |
| Checks.erase(remove_if(Checks, IsCurrentCheck), Checks.end()); |
| |
| assert(CurrentChecks.size() != 0 && "We know we have at least one!"); |
| |
| if (CurrentChecks.size() < 3) { |
| RangeChecksOut.insert(RangeChecksOut.end(), CurrentChecks.begin(), |
| CurrentChecks.end()); |
| continue; |
| } |
| |
| // CurrentChecks.size() will typically be 3 here, but so far there has been |
| // no need to hard-code that fact. |
| |
| llvm::sort(CurrentChecks, [&](const GuardWideningImpl::RangeCheck &LHS, |
| const GuardWideningImpl::RangeCheck &RHS) { |
| return LHS.getOffsetValue().slt(RHS.getOffsetValue()); |
| }); |
| |
| // Note: std::sort should not invalidate the ChecksStart iterator. |
| |
| const ConstantInt *MinOffset = CurrentChecks.front().getOffset(); |
| const ConstantInt *MaxOffset = CurrentChecks.back().getOffset(); |
| |
| unsigned BitWidth = MaxOffset->getValue().getBitWidth(); |
| if ((MaxOffset->getValue() - MinOffset->getValue()) |
| .ugt(APInt::getSignedMinValue(BitWidth))) |
| return false; |
| |
| APInt MaxDiff = MaxOffset->getValue() - MinOffset->getValue(); |
| const APInt &HighOffset = MaxOffset->getValue(); |
| auto OffsetOK = [&](const GuardWideningImpl::RangeCheck &RC) { |
| return (HighOffset - RC.getOffsetValue()).ult(MaxDiff); |
| }; |
| |
| if (MaxDiff.isMinValue() || |
| !std::all_of(std::next(CurrentChecks.begin()), CurrentChecks.end(), |
| OffsetOK)) |
| return false; |
| |
| // We have a series of f+1 checks as: |
| // |
| // I+k_0 u< L ... Chk_0 |
| // I+k_1 u< L ... Chk_1 |
| // ... |
| // I+k_f u< L ... Chk_f |
| // |
| // with forall i in [0,f]: k_f-k_i u< k_f-k_0 ... Precond_0 |
| // k_f-k_0 u< INT_MIN+k_f ... Precond_1 |
| // k_f != k_0 ... Precond_2 |
| // |
| // Claim: |
| // Chk_0 AND Chk_f implies all the other checks |
| // |
| // Informal proof sketch: |
| // |
| // We will show that the integer range [I+k_0,I+k_f] does not unsigned-wrap |
| // (i.e. going from I+k_0 to I+k_f does not cross the -1,0 boundary) and |
| // thus I+k_f is the greatest unsigned value in that range. |
| // |
| // This combined with Ckh_(f+1) shows that everything in that range is u< L. |
| // Via Precond_0 we know that all of the indices in Chk_0 through Chk_(f+1) |
| // lie in [I+k_0,I+k_f], this proving our claim. |
| // |
| // To see that [I+k_0,I+k_f] is not a wrapping range, note that there are |
| // two possibilities: I+k_0 u< I+k_f or I+k_0 >u I+k_f (they can't be equal |
| // since k_0 != k_f). In the former case, [I+k_0,I+k_f] is not a wrapping |
| // range by definition, and the latter case is impossible: |
| // |
| // 0-----I+k_f---I+k_0----L---INT_MAX,INT_MIN------------------(-1) |
| // xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| // |
| // For Chk_0 to succeed, we'd have to have k_f-k_0 (the range highlighted |
| // with 'x' above) to be at least >u INT_MIN. |
| |
| RangeChecksOut.emplace_back(CurrentChecks.front()); |
| RangeChecksOut.emplace_back(CurrentChecks.back()); |
| } |
| |
| assert(RangeChecksOut.size() <= OldCount && "We pessimized!"); |
| return RangeChecksOut.size() != OldCount; |
| } |
| |
| #ifndef NDEBUG |
| StringRef GuardWideningImpl::scoreTypeToString(WideningScore WS) { |
| switch (WS) { |
| case WS_IllegalOrNegative: |
| return "IllegalOrNegative"; |
| case WS_Neutral: |
| return "Neutral"; |
| case WS_Positive: |
| return "Positive"; |
| case WS_VeryPositive: |
| return "VeryPositive"; |
| } |
| |
| llvm_unreachable("Fully covered switch above!"); |
| } |
| #endif |
| |
| PreservedAnalyses GuardWideningPass::run(Function &F, |
| FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) { |
| auto &DT = AM.getResult<DominatorTreeAnalysis>(F); |
| auto &LI = AM.getResult<LoopAnalysis>(F); |
| auto &PDT = AM.getResult<PostDominatorTreeAnalysis>(F); |
| if (!GuardWideningImpl(DT, &PDT, LI, DT.getRootNode(), |
| [](BasicBlock*) { return true; } ).run()) |
| return PreservedAnalyses::all(); |
| |
| PreservedAnalyses PA; |
| PA.preserveSet<CFGAnalyses>(); |
| return PA; |
| } |
| |
| PreservedAnalyses GuardWideningPass::run(Loop &L, LoopAnalysisManager &AM, |
| LoopStandardAnalysisResults &AR, |
| LPMUpdater &U) { |
| BasicBlock *RootBB = L.getLoopPredecessor(); |
| if (!RootBB) |
| RootBB = L.getHeader(); |
| auto BlockFilter = [&](BasicBlock *BB) { |
| return BB == RootBB || L.contains(BB); |
| }; |
| if (!GuardWideningImpl(AR.DT, nullptr, AR.LI, AR.DT.getNode(RootBB), |
| BlockFilter).run()) |
| return PreservedAnalyses::all(); |
| |
| return getLoopPassPreservedAnalyses(); |
| } |
| |
| namespace { |
| struct GuardWideningLegacyPass : public FunctionPass { |
| static char ID; |
| |
| GuardWideningLegacyPass() : FunctionPass(ID) { |
| initializeGuardWideningLegacyPassPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry()); |
| } |
| |
| bool runOnFunction(Function &F) override { |
| if (skipFunction(F)) |
| return false; |
| auto &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree(); |
| auto &LI = getAnalysis<LoopInfoWrapperPass>().getLoopInfo(); |
| auto &PDT = getAnalysis<PostDominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getPostDomTree(); |
| return GuardWideningImpl(DT, &PDT, LI, DT.getRootNode(), |
| [](BasicBlock*) { return true; } ).run(); |
| } |
| |
| void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override { |
| AU.setPreservesCFG(); |
| AU.addRequired<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>(); |
| AU.addRequired<PostDominatorTreeWrapperPass>(); |
| AU.addRequired<LoopInfoWrapperPass>(); |
| } |
| }; |
| |
| /// Same as above, but restricted to a single loop at a time. Can be |
| /// scheduled with other loop passes w/o breaking out of LPM |
| struct LoopGuardWideningLegacyPass : public LoopPass { |
| static char ID; |
| |
| LoopGuardWideningLegacyPass() : LoopPass(ID) { |
| initializeLoopGuardWideningLegacyPassPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry()); |
| } |
| |
| bool runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM) override { |
| if (skipLoop(L)) |
| return false; |
| auto &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree(); |
| auto &LI = getAnalysis<LoopInfoWrapperPass>().getLoopInfo(); |
| auto *PDTWP = getAnalysisIfAvailable<PostDominatorTreeWrapperPass>(); |
| auto *PDT = PDTWP ? &PDTWP->getPostDomTree() : nullptr; |
| BasicBlock *RootBB = L->getLoopPredecessor(); |
| if (!RootBB) |
| RootBB = L->getHeader(); |
| auto BlockFilter = [&](BasicBlock *BB) { |
| return BB == RootBB || L->contains(BB); |
| }; |
| return GuardWideningImpl(DT, PDT, LI, |
| DT.getNode(RootBB), BlockFilter).run(); |
| } |
| |
| void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override { |
| AU.setPreservesCFG(); |
| getLoopAnalysisUsage(AU); |
| AU.addPreserved<PostDominatorTreeWrapperPass>(); |
| } |
| }; |
| } |
| |
| char GuardWideningLegacyPass::ID = 0; |
| char LoopGuardWideningLegacyPass::ID = 0; |
| |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(GuardWideningLegacyPass, "guard-widening", "Widen guards", |
| false, false) |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(DominatorTreeWrapperPass) |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(PostDominatorTreeWrapperPass) |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LoopInfoWrapperPass) |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_END(GuardWideningLegacyPass, "guard-widening", "Widen guards", |
| false, false) |
| |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(LoopGuardWideningLegacyPass, "loop-guard-widening", |
| "Widen guards (within a single loop, as a loop pass)", |
| false, false) |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(DominatorTreeWrapperPass) |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(PostDominatorTreeWrapperPass) |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LoopInfoWrapperPass) |
| INITIALIZE_PASS_END(LoopGuardWideningLegacyPass, "loop-guard-widening", |
| "Widen guards (within a single loop, as a loop pass)", |
| false, false) |
| |
| FunctionPass *llvm::createGuardWideningPass() { |
| return new GuardWideningLegacyPass(); |
| } |
| |
| Pass *llvm::createLoopGuardWideningPass() { |
| return new LoopGuardWideningLegacyPass(); |
| } |
