| ============================= | |
| How To Validate a New Release | |
| ============================= | |
| .. contents:: | |
| :local: | |
| :depth: 1 | |
| Introduction | |
| ============ | |
| This document contains information about testing the release candidates that | |
| will ultimately be the next LLVM release. For more information on how to | |
| manage the actual release, please refer to :doc:`HowToReleaseLLVM`. | |
| Overview of the Release Process | |
| ------------------------------- | |
| Once the release process starts, the Release Manager will ask for volunteers, | |
| and it'll be the role of each volunteer to: | |
| * Test and benchmark the previous release | |
| * Test and benchmark each release candidate, comparing to the previous release | |
| and candidates | |
| * Identify, reduce and report every regression found during tests and benchmarks | |
| * Make sure the critical bugs get fixed and merged to the next release candidate | |
| Not all bugs or regressions are show-stoppers and it's a bit of a grey area what | |
| should be fixed before the next candidate and what can wait until the next | |
| release. | |
| It'll depend on: | |
| * The severity of the bug, how many people it affects and if it's a regression | |
| or a known bug. Known bugs are "unsupported features" and some bugs can be | |
| disabled if they have been implemented recently. | |
| * The stage in the release. Less critical bugs should be considered to be | |
| fixed between RC1 and RC2, but not so much at the end of it. | |
| * If it's a correctness or a performance regression. Performance regression | |
| tends to be taken more lightly than correctness. | |
| .. _scripts: | |
| Scripts | |
| ======= | |
| The scripts are in the ``utils/release`` directory. | |
| test-release.sh | |
| --------------- | |
| This script will check-out, configure and compile LLVM+Clang (+ most add-ons, | |
| like ``compiler-rt``, ``libcxx``, ``libomp`` and ``clang-extra-tools``) in | |
| three stages, and will test the final stage. | |
| It'll have installed the final binaries on the Phase3/Releasei(+Asserts) | |
| directory, and that's the one you should use for the test-suite and other | |
| external tests. | |
| To run the script on a specific release candidate run:: | |
| ./test-release.sh \ | |
| -release 3.3 \ | |
| -rc 1 \ | |
| -no-64bit \ | |
| -test-asserts \ | |
| -no-compare-files | |
| Each system will require different options. For instance, x86_64 will | |
| obviously not need ``-no-64bit`` while 32-bit systems will, or the script will | |
| fail. | |
| The important flags to get right are: | |
| * On the pre-release, you should change ``-rc 1`` to ``-final``. On RC2, | |
| change it to ``-rc 2`` and so on. | |
| * On non-release testing, you can use ``-final`` in conjunction with | |
| ``-no-checkout``, but you'll have to create the ``final`` directory by hand | |
| and link the correct source dir to ``final/llvm.src``. | |
| * For release candidates, you need ``-test-asserts``, or it won't create a | |
| "Release+Asserts" directory, which is needed for release testing and | |
| benchmarking. This will take twice as long. | |
| * On the final candidate you just need Release builds, and that's the binary | |
| directory you'll have to pack. | |
| This script builds three phases of Clang+LLVM twice each (Release and | |
| Release+Asserts), so use screen or nohup to avoid headaches, since it'll take | |
| a long time. | |
| Use the ``--help`` option to see all the options and chose it according to | |
| your needs. | |
| findRegressions-nightly.py | |
| -------------------------- | |
| TODO | |
| .. _test-suite: | |
| Test Suite | |
| ========== | |
| .. contents:: | |
| :local: | |
| Follow the `LNT Quick Start Guide | |
| <http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html>`__ link on how to set-up the | |
| test-suite | |
| The binary location you'll have to use for testing is inside the | |
| ``rcN/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-REL-RC.install``. | |
| Link that directory to an easier location and run the test-suite. | |
| An example on the run command line, assuming you created a link from the correct | |
| install directory to ``~/devel/llvm/install``:: | |
| ./sandbox/bin/python sandbox/bin/lnt runtest \ | |
| nt \ | |
| -j4 \ | |
| --sandbox sandbox \ | |
| --test-suite ~/devel/llvm/test/test-suite \ | |
| --cc ~/devel/llvm/install/bin/clang \ | |
| --cxx ~/devel/llvm/install/bin/clang++ | |
| It should have no new regressions, compared to the previous release or release | |
| candidate. You don't need to fix all the bugs in the test-suite, since they're | |
| not necessarily meant to pass on all architectures all the time. This is | |
| due to the nature of the result checking, which relies on direct comparison, | |
| and most of the time, the failures are related to bad output checking, rather | |
| than bad code generation. | |
| If the errors are in LLVM itself, please report every single regression found | |
| as blocker, and all the other bugs as important, but not necessarily blocking | |
| the release to proceed. They can be set as "known failures" and to be | |
| fix on a future date. | |
| .. _pre-release-process: | |
| Pre-Release Process | |
| =================== | |
| .. contents:: | |
| :local: | |
| When the release process is announced on the mailing list, you should prepare | |
| for the testing, by applying the same testing you'll do on the release | |
| candidates, on the previous release. | |
| You should: | |
| * Download the previous release sources from | |
| http://llvm.org/releases/download.html. | |
| * Run the test-release.sh script on ``final`` mode (change ``-rc 1`` to | |
| ``-final``). | |
| * Once all three stages are done, it'll test the final stage. | |
| * Using the ``Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-MAJ.MIN-final.install`` base, | |
| run the test-suite. | |
| If the final phase's ``make check-all`` failed, it's a good idea to also test | |
| the intermediate stages by going on the obj directory and running | |
| ``make check-all`` to find if there's at least one stage that passes (helps | |
| when reducing the error for bug report purposes). | |
| .. _release-process: | |
| Release Process | |
| =============== | |
| .. contents:: | |
| :local: | |
| When the Release Manager sends you the release candidate, download all sources, | |
| unzip on the same directory (there will be sym-links from the appropriate places | |
| to them), and run the release test as above. | |
| You should: | |
| * Download the current candidate sources from where the release manager points | |
| you (ex. http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.3/rc1/). | |
| * Repeat the steps above with ``-rc 1``, ``-rc 2`` etc modes and run the | |
| test-suite the same way. | |
| * Compare the results, report all errors on Bugzilla and publish the binary blob | |
| where the release manager can grab it. | |
| Once the release manages announces that the latest candidate is the good one, | |
| you have to pack the ``Release`` (no Asserts) install directory on ``Phase3`` | |
| and that will be the official binary. | |
| * Rename (or link) ``clang+llvm-REL-ARCH-ENV`` to the .install directory | |
| * Tar that into the same name with ``.tar.gz`` extensioan from outside the | |
| directory | |
| * Make it available for the release manager to download | |
| .. _bug-reporting: | |
| Bug Reporting Process | |
| ===================== | |
| .. contents:: | |
| :local: | |
| If you found regressions or failures when comparing a release candidate with the | |
| previous release, follow the rules below: | |
| * Critical bugs on compilation should be fixed as soon as possible, possibly | |
| before releasing the binary blobs. | |
| * Check-all tests should be fixed before the next release candidate, but can | |
| wait until the test-suite run is finished. | |
| * Bugs in the test suite or unimportant check-all tests can be fixed in between | |
| release candidates. | |
| * New features or recent big changes, when close to the release, should have | |
| done in a way that it's easy to disable. If they misbehave, prefer disabling | |
| them than releasing an unstable (but untested) binary package. |