| # Tracking SPIRV-Tools work with GitHub projects |
| |
| We are experimenting with using the [GitHub Project |
| feature](https://help.github.com/articles/tracking-the-progress-of-your-work-with-projects/) |
| to track progress toward large goals. |
| |
| For more on GitHub Projects in general, see: |
| * [Introductory blog post](https://github.com/blog/2256-a-whole-new-github-universe-announcing-new-tools-forums-and-features) |
| * [Introductory video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6MGKHkNtxU) |
| |
| The current SPIRV-Tools project list can be found at |
| [https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Tools/projects](https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Tools/projects) |
| |
| ## How we use a Project |
| |
| A GitHub Project is a set of work with an overall purpose, and |
| consists of a collection of *Cards*. |
| Each card is either a *Note* or a regular GitHub *Issue.* |
| A Note can be converted to an Issue. |
| |
| In our projects, a card represents work, i.e. a change that can |
| be applied to the repository. |
| The work could be a feature, a bug to be fixed, documentation to be |
| updated, etc. |
| |
| A project and its cards are used as a [Kanban |
| board](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanban_board), where cards progress |
| through a workflow starting with ideas through to implementation and completion. |
| |
| In our usage, a *project manager* is someone who organizes the work. |
| They manage the creation and movement of cards |
| through the project workflow: |
| * They create cards to capture ideas, or to decompose large ideas into smaller |
| ones. |
| * They determine if the work for a card has been completed. |
| * Normally they are the person (or persons) who can approve and merge a pull |
| request into the `master` branch. |
| |
| Our projects organize cards into the following columns: |
| * `Ideas`: Work which could be done, captured either as Cards or Notes. |
| * A card in this column could be marked as a [PLACEHOLDER](#placeholders). |
| * `Ready to start`: Issues which represent work we'd like to do, and which |
| are not blocked by other work. |
| * The issue should be narrow enough that it can usually be addressed by a |
| single pull request. |
| * We want these to be Issues (not Notes) so that someone can claim the work |
| by updating the Issue with their intent to do the work. |
| Once an Issue is claimed, the project manager moves the corresponding card |
| from `Ready to start` to `In progress`. |
| * `In progress`: Issues which were in `Ready to start` but which have been |
| claimed by someone. |
| * `Done`: Issues which have been resolved, by completing their work. |
| * The changes have been applied to the repository, typically by being pushed |
| into the `master` branch. |
| * Other kinds of work could update repository settings, for example. |
| * `Rejected ideas`: Work which has been considered, but which we don't want |
| implemented. |
| * We keep rejected ideas so they are not proposed again. This serves |
| as a form of institutional memory. |
| * We should record why an idea is rejected. For this reason, a rejected |
| idea is likely to be an Issue which has been closed. |
| |
| ## Prioritization |
| |
| We are considering prioritizing cards in the `Ideas` and `Ready to start` |
| columns so that things that should be considered first float up to the top. |
| |
| Experience will tell us if we stick to that rule, and if it proves helpful. |
| |
| ## Placeholders |
| |
| A *placeholder* is a Note or Issue that represents a possibly large amount |
| of work that can be broadly defined but which may not have been broken down |
| into small implementable pieces of work. |
| |
| Use a placeholder to capture a big idea, but without doing the upfront work |
| to consider all the details of how it should be implemented. |
| Over time, break off pieces of the placeholder into implementable Issues. |
| Move those Issues into the `Ready to start` column when they become unblocked. |
| |
| We delete the placeholder when all its work has been decomposed into |
| implementable cards. |